Member Info for Rubey

Quite frankly, these comments on Corallian are made by people who are completely out of the loop. And if UJO is valued at £100m, RBD will be valued at £400m.

RNST. You need to keep up, you thick ****.
https://www.investegate.co.uk/reabold-resources--rbd-/rns/exercise-of-warrants-in-corallian/202012010700040156H/
'On 21 November 2019, Warrants were issued to all Corallian shareholders on the register at that date'

RNST:
'the last raise was at £2.20.'

That figure was set on 21st November 2019 - before Corallian were awarded the Victory gas licence.

Where did I state that you could 'maneuver' this share? Firstly, I wouldn't spell it like that. Secondly, I said you encourage private investors (unlike you) to sell.

If you are insinuating I am 'balls deep', once again you're wrong. My break even is 0.34, and only 8% of my portfolio is currently in RBD, not that it's any of your business.
I don't 'ramp' this company. I put up an argument to counter your incessant lies. But you'll be gone soon, and the mugs who sold because they believed you and sold at a loss, will be kicking themselves for trusting scum like you.

Mr I, you clearly believe the primary school maths that was promoted by some of the idiots on here. The value was set at 0.675p, which had been the average share price over the period leading up to the offer. Corallian shares were valued at £3.20.

You do it every month persimmon! And last time there was one the share price went up 10%, so I was right, wasn't I! You just feed the old market manipulator/lying tree hugger catchline that fund raises lower the share price.

Anyway, what about an answer. Did you sell all of your 'shareholding'?

https://twitter.com/Heid_oil/status/1409414608478167041

So in view of all your extraordinary speculation persimmon, I assume you would have to be a half wit if you haven't sold your entire shareholding?

Bridgedogg, I believe it was an agreement that it would be a maximum of 500 bopd with planners, but it may be reviewed in time if Egdon prove to be responsible operators! Perhaps it will come down to increased community payments? Maybe CCF would know the reasoning behind it?

There are clearly more annoying tree huggers that use this bulletin board than shareholders realize. Why can't they stick to posting on drill or drop? Maybe because the sensible posters on there make them look stupid.

Proved my point nicely ; )

get a wash ffs.

That bloke is a grubby individual. Not unlike some posters on here.

The effect of the proppant squeeze at Crosby Warren - 45 bopd to 700 bopd.

https://mem.lyellcollection.org/content/52/1/55

He's a pretty unpleasant dick, isn't he. Is he the environmental protestor who dumped a load of junk beside the road which cost the council over £1k to clean up?

Haha, your post appeared when I posted mine. Sorry.

Feelinlucky, that should be a shade under 50%.

I couldn't vote, but I agree that without Heid on the list, a vote was pointless.

Indeed Manwell, but the point is they're not going to go through with the application unless what they've found at WNB is in line with their expectations. They'd have to completely rethink the project.

GP. He said that so they knew the result would be known before the next meeting (end of July). If you look at the minutes, you'll see it's under the section for 'date of next meeting'. SINCE that meeting, Mark Abbott (as you rightly say, he should know) has stated it would be concluded in June.

It was to ask if they needed an Environmental Impact Assessment. It wasn't a planning application.

No Manwell, that was the screening opinion request:

https://newplanningaccess.eastriding.gov.uk/newplanningaccess/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=QLJI6TBJ0R500&activeTab=summary