Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Just my interpretation:
https://www.investegate.co.uk/reabold-resources--rbd-/rns/partial-sale-of-convertible-loan-notes/202103030700079332Q/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ2-CQMmwIA&t=1s
I think it's absolutely hilarious Manwell.
Not sure that worked?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ2-CQMmwIA&t=86s
I posted this this morning, but thought there may be some who haven't seen it, who may appreciate me reposting it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ2-CQMmwIA&t=86s
IF, and it's a big IF, there has been a leak, I think it's pretty obvious the route it will have taken. However, I think the potential originator should have already smelt the coffee from previous experiences, so personally, I think it's BS. Especially knowing the history of the one making it public.
If the companies involved would give some sort of update, market abusers would have no environment in which to operate.
It seems odd to me that what is being called 'independent thought' is being lauded. What that of course really means is that statements that are being delivered as 'FACT' that have not come via an RNS or interview of the CEOs, and quite possibly come from people intent on damaging the share price, are being given inflated recognition, probably by those also involved.
'you won't see all 118 metres in any individual well. It certainly can't all be in the B-1Z well that is currently testing.'
'rectify the issues.'
'No oil has been encountered and as of this morning, no oil or gas has flowed.'
'method for 1 zone'
'no oil tankers have been seen or reported by any of the eyes watching.'
'not yet on 24 hour working'
Since testing hasn't yet concluded, and the information coming from site is from a stinking swampy who would want all shareholders to lose their investment, how can anyone say these statements as 'FACTS' knowing they will lead, in some cases, to panic selling - unless that is their intention of course.
I think it's best to stick to 'cut and paste' jobs from RNSs. You can stuff 'independent thinking' market manipulation.
You're the one with multiple personalities, Pete.
As it happens, I wasn't going to say anything one way or the other about GP's post. An interesting perspective, but a view I don't entirely agree with. Watts gave his view. I don't know what Heid would think. But other people are entitled to have thoughts, even though you seem to think we shouldn't.