Member Info for Rubey

It's not, actually persimmon.

By the way, have you ever participated in taking placing shares? Do you know what percentage fee the brokers charge? Didn't think so.

Just my interpretation:

https://www.investegate.co.uk/reabold-resources--rbd-/rns/partial-sale-of-convertible-loan-notes/202103030700079332Q/

I'd have thought there's a clue in an earlier RNS regarding Corallian.

Indeed deemule. He reminds me of a bloke I used to work with. Going on the beer with him was a bloody good night out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ2-CQMmwIA&t=1s

I think it's absolutely hilarious Manwell.

Not sure that worked?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ2-CQMmwIA&t=86s

I posted this this morning, but thought there may be some who haven't seen it, who may appreciate me reposting it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ2-CQMmwIA&t=86s

https://twitter.com/alans27/status/1413018315283476482

I hope it was a little necklace Heid ; )

Just an attempt at levity, Brixton. I feel we could do with it today.

**** off Mirasol. I am full on, 100% male heterosexual. I would not call myself Heidi (although I used to be called Stephanie, but that was a long time ago).

IF, and it's a big IF, there has been a leak, I think it's pretty obvious the route it will have taken. However, I think the potential originator should have already smelt the coffee from previous experiences, so personally, I think it's BS. Especially knowing the history of the one making it public.
If the companies involved would give some sort of update, market abusers would have no environment in which to operate.

I'm still here Heidi. The market abusers will have their pound of flesh, won't they. But not a drop of blood from me!

Agreed deemule. All sorts going on today.
Is baits a UKOG shareholder trying to kick another company in frustration at his own companies performance, rather than kick who he should be.

I'd be quite interested in a reply too, RNST. You have backed up a fake 'FACT'. You should prove it's not fake.

It seems odd to me that what is being called 'independent thought' is being lauded. What that of course really means is that statements that are being delivered as 'FACT' that have not come via an RNS or interview of the CEOs, and quite possibly come from people intent on damaging the share price, are being given inflated recognition, probably by those also involved.

'you won't see all 118 metres in any individual well. It certainly can't all be in the B-1Z well that is currently testing.'
'rectify the issues.'
'No oil has been encountered and as of this morning, no oil or gas has flowed.'
'method for 1 zone'
'no oil tankers have been seen or reported by any of the eyes watching.'
'not yet on 24 hour working'

Since testing hasn't yet concluded, and the information coming from site is from a stinking swampy who would want all shareholders to lose their investment, how can anyone say these statements as 'FACTS' knowing they will lead, in some cases, to panic selling - unless that is their intention of course.

I think it's best to stick to 'cut and paste' jobs from RNSs. You can stuff 'independent thinking' market manipulation.

You're bringing them all out today Pete. It's like watching Sybil.

You're the one with multiple personalities, Pete.
As it happens, I wasn't going to say anything one way or the other about GP's post. An interesting perspective, but a view I don't entirely agree with. Watts gave his view. I don't know what Heid would think. But other people are entitled to have thoughts, even though you seem to think we shouldn't.

Indeed Ninetails. We should always remember the people doing the job at the 'coal face' are doing a potentially very dangerous job.

In my opinion, Brixton, no news is good news.