Member Info for roses

Pad, no it’s still down 3.2%

Just been thinking back about when I first ‘invested’ in valirx in January 2011 (before the last 125 to 1 consolidation) and the the price subsequently went up to 3.2p ( equivalent to £4 no that’s not a misprint it’s equivalent to 400p in today’s money (3.2 x 125) )

What a shambles, and a master class in ‘how many ways can we find death spiral funding’

Sl100, what would you class as a ‘ relatively modest upswing ‘

Is it 1%
10%
100%
1000% (bear in mind that the majority of holders would still be down by 95% if it did rise 1000% from here.

Or is it 10,000% (quite a few holders still well out of pocket ! )

Sl100, umm, yes you did. Here is your post from 2 days ago:

”SL100
Posted in: VAL
Posts: 591
Price: 0.078
No Opinion
RE: RE:RE:SL10010 Feb 2020 20:23
Dracula- you’re wrong. As usual you think Mickey Mouse research = facts.

Why anybody would go to post this long winded message says more about you than me.

I’m still in relatively positive territory as soon as we get rid of you Fred and the other loonies.

I hope your vote is defeated and I am VOTING WITH THE BOD!!”

Dracula, on that note, did we ever find out if we lost Val101 in that deal, ?

I’m usually up to date, but can’t recall any update after it was transferred as part of the deal ?

Happy to be corrected ?

As a percentage of their initial investment.

Rightback, it’s all relative. Anyone who bought recently or is a trader has much much more to lose than the majority.

I have nothing against traders as I’m a trader myself and never pretended otherwise.

But it does pizz me off when people resort to underhand tactics to try to sucker others in.

SL100, there are numerous examples and a simple google search should aid your education.

On a seperate note, I agree with bb. Your maths simply don’t add up ?

You posted yesterday that you were in a positive position with valirx, yet in other posts you have claimed that you have been a long term holder and at a time 90% down from a much higher average and have been averaging down.

Now you don’t need to be a math professor to work out that it would be impossible for you to be in a positive position while the share price sits at a historical low whilst also claiming to be a long term holder.

The only way that could be true is if you had been heavily trading the stock, whilst claiming to be a long term holder ?

SL, you just posted

”Those who criticise the BOD for various insensitivity ultimately display Greg sane to others. That’s why thus action must and will fail. It’s a form of private investor bullying!”

Please tell me you are joking.

Whilst I think you and anyone else could have valid reasons for disagreeing with a no vote, you are now actively defending The BOD of THE worst performing company on AIM.

How in all honesty can you defend such mismanagement and misinformation.

It is one thing to want to persuade people to vote yes to delay the inevitable but don’t even try to say that the BOD are not at fault for the mess they now find themselves in.

The rns states to go directly to the new venue.

All attendees are will be given a complimentary glass of Kool aid on arrival.

Looks like they need a bigger venue !

No, warrants would be consolidated as well.

Probably, but they would be at a much much higher price than here.

We would need some seriously good news to get back up to those prices

The cheapest warrants are price at 0.1p from the last placing, so can’t be cashed in unless the price rises back above that.

Freddy, what’s the point of phoning them, they have shown in the past that they are happy to promise the world on the phone, but use entirely different language in an RNS

Valju, yes everything issued ad yet to be issued will be consolidated including warrants etc.

Sl100, I can tell.
You are polite and it’s obvious that you have a very decent education and understanding of the second and third degree implications of the less than ideal outcomes of the upcoming meeting.

However there s a strong argument to be had that to carry on in the same vein is just delaying the inevitable ?

I didn’t mean you, I meant in general, sorry for the confusion.

Sorry for sounding so down, but for once I really had hoped that the management would address at least a few of the shareholders concerns.