Member Info for Romeike

Tullow's responsibility ends at offtake in Ghana anyway, but for completeness the ships travel up the West coast of Africa, so no.

It's a pity that Capricorn spaffed it's spare cash on nothing.

Non prejudicial settlement is just that, you are paying them to simply end the case. You are taking this to mean some admission of guilt, but inversely it is an admission that there is no case to answer. You have no idea what if anything GSK has provided as a settlement amount, it may be only just enough to cover legal costs to date for the litigant. Regardless it is not evidence to be considered by a jury, only evidence within the scope of that before them can be considered. Jury trials to date on this matter went against the plaintiffs. The fact is the only true evidence available is focussed on 16 reliable studies all of which found zero connection between ranitidine and cancer.

Unfortunately the scheme appears to go deeper than that to share price manipulation.

Https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1056009/gsk-clouds-blowing-over-suggests-berenberg-1056009.html

What is disgraceful is the actions of lawyers exploiting vulnerable people, having them endure the stress of an entirely baseless law suit when they should be focussing on staying healthy, and hopefully remission. Promising them fortunes when in reality the lawyers pocket almost all of any settlement. The science is clear, there is no link between Zantac cancer.

NDMA formation in Ranitidine would at a minimum require the medicine to be stored at 40°C (104°F) (!) with 75% relative humidity for up to 8 weeks. Not only is this totally contrary to the CLEAR instruction on the packaging to keep medications in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight and heat, to prevent degradation and ensure safety, it is also absurd to think any of the plaintiffs have stored medicine like this - and if they have it is hardly the fault of the manufacturer that they ignored the instructions on the packaging. Personal responsibility matters.

"This debt is high as Mount Everest. But everyone forgets the fact"

Again, this is now not the case - look at analysts comments on progress tackling debt, look at the huge improvement in the bonds

Hardly - that certainly used to be true, but the picture is very different now - don't take my word for it - look at the analyst comments, look at the bond prices

You say that and yet so far at least it seems to be following capitulation followed by reversal. If this does play out like that then it could be the beginning of the long awaited growth phase for the stock. The bonds suggest increasing confidence about the 26 refinancing.

It is typically better to sell tops rather than bottoms.

Drop today appears to be because a number of stop losses have been hit.

Net Zero is a scam but everyone has to play along because no one is going to tell the Emperor they are naked.

Just a reminder once again that the legalities and physical transfer of this required funding is not under the control of the board so all we can do is wait

Given that transfer of subscriber funds is not remotely under Emma and team's control it's rather unfair to be throwing blame. Personally I am thankful for the hard work they've done to keep the company viable and a week delay in re-listing is nothing when we were facing the prospect of possible failure of the company and loss of all value.

Q1 is usually the lower figure I guess, I hope that full year avg. production on Jubilee will be at the 100+ bopd run rate indicated.

"Shareholder returns" which I see as a hint at share by-backs look likely from second half 2025 in my opinion. Totally depends on debt reduction staying on plan. Dhir is correct to stay the course on debt because it is the root cause of negative sentiment against the stock.

Should have merged with Tullow. What a joke.

Another tranche bought by same director

I don't get it...if API is so toxic (see impact on CREI, and now Urban SP) why are they getting buy out offers? Is this basically a gamble on interest rates falling making the API portfolio viable again?