Member Info for Rollthediceagain

I made a loss on this transaction but I've made far more money on STGR in previous tax years so hardly 'bitter'. Nothing I post on a bb is going to 'take us & the company down with you' . I post my opinion that's it. I don't tell you or another else what to do. I think PIs are being sold a pup not just by previous BoD but this one too. I don't need to talk STGR down as their (in)actions speak for themselves if they weren't being drowned by certain posters continual ramping. BBs should be about balance ~ you express your view, I'll express mine and everyone can then take a decision that they are ultimately responsible for.

This was my last trade on STGR: Order Detail Order Status - Executed Order Reference - JF5XJZ Date - 14/09/16 Time - 09:57 Stock Name - STRATMIN GLOBAL Action - Sell Order Type - Market Symbol - STGR Quantity - 100,000.00 Limit Price - Price £0.0255 Consideration - £2,550.00 Commission - £8.95 Stamp Duty - £0.00 Levy - £0.00 Total - £2,541.05 Accrued Interest - £0.00 Expiry Date - n/a Settlement Date - 16/09/16 Settlement Period - T + 2 Market Currency - GBP Settlement Currency - GBP Indicative FX Rate - n/a Of course as a 'shorter' (in jimbo-world) I shouldn't have had any shares to sell but in real life these were the last of my shares.

I've previously posted that. I sold at a loss which I'll use to offset CGT gains elsewhere.

I got rid of the last of mine on the 14th spike but my wife still has a small number in her iSA. Why is this important?

Now I'm the one yawning. If anyone was shorting and today's news was perceived to be positive then there would be a mad scramble to buy shares pushing sp up. I can't see much evidence of that which leads to me to the conclusion that a) no-one is shorting this and b) todays news isn't that hot. I said that I expected a placing withing 60days if you're bothered with telling the truth for once.

I don't own any shares now bjornagain but if STGR made a compelling case to reinvestment I would. I live in hope, still follow STGR news but haven't read anything yet that makes me regret bailing.

Not trying to scare anyone just outlining the rules. Existing shareholders can make their own judgement. For the record, yet again, I have never shorted STGR.. you keep repeating the same nonsense but that doesn't make it true. You can lead a horse to water....

Jimbo AIM rules seem pretty clear to me so rather than yawning perhaps you should take note and ask yourself how will STGR meet the criteria. NOMAD's chase fees like every other city bloodsucker.

Should have added that these rules came into effect July 2016 before STGR's divestment took effect so these would apply to STGR.

Unless I'm reading AIM rules wrong STGR need to both publish its investing policy and have cash/investments worth at least £6m by end of 6month window. Todays news goes part way towards that, existing cash & tranche 2 should also fall within it but still a funding gap IMHO. Rule 15 - Fundamental changes of business ----------------------------------------- /..Within six months of becoming an AIM Rule 15 cash shell, the AIM company must make an acquisition or acquisitions which constitutes a reverse takeover under rule 14. For the purposes of this rule only, becoming an investing company pursuant to rule 8 (including the associated raising of funds as specified in rule 8) will be treated as a reverse takeover and the provisions of rule 14 will apply including the requirement to publish an admission document../ Rule 8 - Investing Companies ---------------------------- Where the applicant is an investing company, a condition of its admission is that it raises a minimum of £6 million in cash via an equity fundraising on, or immediately before, admission. An investing company must state and follow an investing policy../

$1.5m not £1.5m jimbo. Staged drawdown a third of which is only available after 6mths AIM deadline has expired. Amount ~ c £1m ~ is pretty inconsequential but as I've already acknowledged it's a positive first step.

lol I'm not paid or a deramper but am negative on STGR. Amount raised is inconsequential, placing will follow, my view on that hasn't changed. It is positive that first step has been to raise funds in this manner though. I suggest that we need details of JV & other ventures to qualify STGR as an investment vehicle before champagne corks are prematurely popped.

Limited upside if STGR intends to sell to (part) fund new asset/JV. Tranche 2 & 3 shares issued at the prevailing rate. STGR need cash within next 6months so Tranche 2 & 3 may well be immaterial to question of whether STGR can maintain AIM listing. Personally I'd prefer they kept the Tranche 1 shares and raised the cash by other means so that STGR does benefit from Graphmada asset being successfully managed.

Limited upside if STGR intends to sell to (part) fund new asset/JV. Tranche 2 & 3 shares issued at the prevailing rate. STGR need cash within next 6months so Tranche 2 & 3 may well be immaterial to question of whether STGR can maintain AIM listing. Personally I'd prefer they kept the Tranche 1 shares and raised the cash by other means so that STGR does benefit from Graphmada asset being successfully managed.

Because the same people who are here today kicking stratmin whilst it's down, to close their shorts, are the very same people who were posting relentlessly last year that the mine was not good, pulling the share price down to make it impossible for STGR to raise money off its own mcap to patch up the mine. --- Nonsense. STGR failed to deliver on any of their production targets that is the reason why individuals *****ed and the wider didn't want to back them (STGR).

The answer to that is in your first sentence "whenever this share looks even weaker"... it's the fall that prompts me to look at STGR again, just as a rise would. The fall precedes any posts I may make so my views can't be the cause of it can they?

I've often wondered whether Arminius or Jimbo or both are in some way connected to STGR. They're always claiming to be 'in the know' and remain ramptastic regardless of the news, sp movement or reality. What we've got at the moment is a shell with not a lot of money who intend to sell the BASS shares (bang goes the upside on those) to seek new opportunities which will require significant new investment. This is to be done against a background of a ticking clock and in the case of tranche 2 & 3 monies uncertain delivery. What's not to like eh?!

I don't own many that's for sure and I confirmed only a few days ago that I had sold more at 2.55p (at a loss). When the future is clearer I'll buy more if the proposition stacks up.

More evidence if it was needed that STGR needs to raise money. Sp will continue to drift down until future & funding are clearer. I may have been ramping by predicting a placing at 1-1.2p yesterday :)

I'm deeply hurt by that comment :) As night follows day, so a placing follows the change or appointment of a new broker. If no placing follows within 60 days of this news I'll pack my bags and never haunt this thread again.