Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Iron
You might be right but signing could be Monday and confirmation could be Tuesday.
Spot on Bladder, about the number of shares in issue at PREM.
Well, even if it was the latter rather than later, ;o) , lower the expectations because people and circumstances often disappoint. All part of the woven tapestry of investing and as long as the optimum goal is at least neared, if not reached, then your investment will increase in value. Nothing is guaranteed but that's the risk you take with any stock, including Ftse100 stocks, when you press 'buy'. The other option, which everyone can choose to do, is keep your cash in the bank.
Here's the deal.
There are a whole host of examples of stocks that have performed badly for years, some through misjudgement of leadership and some through just bad luck, or both, and then an opportunity presents itself, combined with a set of positive external factors that completely change the fortunes and progress of it.
That's how I see COPL at the moment. If it turns out I got it wrong ? So what ! I'll move on and invest elsewhere.
I won't remain here wallowing in sorrow, trying to bring misery to other investors and their own investing journey because of my own decisions and bad timing, and then expect everyone to respect me for it !
It's just a financial transaction for everyone who invests, II's and PI's alike, nothing more.
Think it was a Government grant, Houston.
Agree Bladder.
Enjoy the journey.
Wrong, CawCaw
It makes me somebody who challenges your made up claims, which you detest.
That was to Island. :o)
Haha !
Don't say you weren't warned 'Lord Haw-Haw'.
Just reciprocating the gesture.
Apart from that, and this really does make me laugh, you're still invested and you have a choice not to be.
Actions speak far louder than words.
I'll leave that to you 'Lord Haw-Haw'.
You seem to have a penchant for it.
As an aside, it's all very well you and I criticising each other as anonymous individuals with no redress on reputation but you're sailing very close to the wind repeatedly publicly ****ging off someone who is known, also publicly, and some of the claims you're making about them are putting yourself at far more financial risk than your investment.
Only takes one comment too far to trigger a reaction.
How's that for a fairy tale ?
'Lord Haw-Haw' would have been better fitting than 'CawCaw'.
CawCaw
Re: Monday
'No RNS during market hours = no Atomic. No kidding.'
Utter BS based on a myriad of imaginary assumptions with nothing factual whatsoever to back it up.
Anyway, they could already have buggered off, given the delays in TR1's.
It would only have taken a volume like todays, assuming half of the volume are sells, over four days, and there's been plenty of volume days like todays or far higher recently, to ditch them completely.
Me too Base.
There's thirteen million reasons apparently. ยง:-D
Correct Iron
They'd be around 6% without dilution.
Just proves you can't count and you can't see a price chart.
Not so sure CD on the insolvent equation.
The cash will be coming in to COPL. If another party is insolvent and no longer exist, more cash for COPL, surely.
When they say 'you'll feel a small prick' .... tell them to stop being so personal !
:o)
Haha !
Already home, Hoping.
I'll go bigger on the expected share price increase.
:o)