RE: Fair value, cheap or what?22 Jan 2026 11:09
Morning John/Pharmall,
Echo your points there Pharmall (although I would argue that historically it's more like 2 items of news a year, AGM statement last year was a debut one!). Having said that I, bought 1k shares yesterday for a tad under 12 quid (having sold 2k at 16 quid). I will wait and see about having another 1 or 2k, bringing my holding up to 14/15k. Ultimately, I'm prepared to pay 12 quid a share with a long-term view, but I may well be able to get in much cheaper.
I agree, I don't expect to hear any M&A stuff soon, although maybe some of the financial buyers might up their bid if there's some prelimniary trade interest.
I've said before here, after attending the AGM last year I'm more or less convinced they intend to sell the defence division as well once the non-defence assests are disposed of. Michael Bell (80 yrs old) has a thrid of the the share issuance (along with his wife), Michael O'Connell (79) has 6.52%, ex life-long employee and previous executive board memeber and non-exec member David Pyle (79) has 9.4%.
Nicholas Bell, Michael Bell's son, (1%) early 50s, said one sentence (I'm not joking) in the entirety of a 2 hour AGM. He is a complete spare part and put out to graze heading the forks division. There is zero chance of him being groomed to take over the chairmanship. The promotions to the board of Shelley Ashcroft and John Meldrum are internal window dressing (they couldn't carry on as they were without a FO given the growth of the company). The two non-execs are both 80. If they were serious about 'leading the company in to the future', they would be getting younger, experienced defence industry experts in externally as non-execs etc. They have no such intentions.
It was comical looking at the board, like an HM Bateman cartoon from Punch magazine. Roger Lane Smith (a very successful lawyer, but no experience of defence) has been awarded 100k phantom shares. The reference to 'incentivising' him is preposterous, but more informative is the clause about vesting on change of control:
Company has granted a phantom award in respect of 100,000 notional shares, exercisable at nil
value, to Roger Lane-Smith to reflect his significant contribution to the Board, and the Company’s
progess and international development, and in order to retain and incentivise future service to the
Company (the “Phantom Award”). The Phantom Award will be cash-settled in reference to the share
price on the date of exercise. The vesting of the phantom award is subject to continued service and
will only vest in the event of a future change of control of the Company. The Phantom Awards will
lapse if they have not vested within 10 years of grant.
How long it might take is anyone's guess, but I think the clues as to the BoD's intended outcome are staring us in the face.