RE: Next news16 Apr 2023 16:22
Right or wrong since when has anybodies plans ran like clockwork?
However to rely on the word of one person who spoke with Jay that evening, either individually or in a group discussion; is to rely on just one interpretation of what was being said. Was it a private conversation for the benefit of one investor? Hmmm, I would think anything official said would be unlikely, so assuming it wasn't private, did everybody present agree with Crusty, or was it just people on here that prefer to believe his interpretation? If it was a private if the record conversation, should we be accepting it without question, because it may or nay not suit our own plans?
I'm not questioning his interpretation, but so many bashers on here hypocritically claim things on these bbs carry no influence on investor decisions, yet when it suits their stance seem ready to rely on the words of one ID.
Tbh with or without being told, if we had gone it alone NT3 (CH1) would have been the way we had to fund ffd. Jay did actually say openly at the AGM when recommending the farm out, that to achieve ffd without the farm in would be a drill raise scenario over many many years.
Those familiar with O&G I would assume to have understood that without needing to be told.
Anyway, I have a funny feeling this week is going to be a good one, RNS or not. GLA
Imagine going into this drill that we would have to wait seven years between each drill. Thats does bate thinking about for lth even if good for the day traders