Member Info for RKBeekeeper

If you did do proper research you would be aware of 10%

RKB

Good Morning LtdAxis

I was talking to Timmit this morning and said “I was thinking last night when I was trying to complete the Post that I would list various films, ones with lots of twists and turns but then I decided to leave that to the experts but some names came to mind instantly.

Colzitz
The Great Escape
The Italian Job (Timmit’s)

And obviously yours does deserve to be a contender. It does look like it is 50:50 so we shall see.

RKB

BAFTA Awards

British Academy of Film and Television Arts due on 2nd February.

As we await news from FG on:

Mediapolis Land Money €1,938,469.98 which we know from Court documents dated no later than 4th December 2019 that the auctioneer has to transfer THE MONEY to the Receiver who then SHOULD transfer the money to Clear Leisure 2017.

Sipiem Court Hearing which was scheduled for 6th November 2019 has been “held back” till early February 2020. This claim is for €10.8 million and a credit of €238,000 which, if it goes our way, we will receive 70% less a small contingency fee to the Lawyers.

Sosushi Legal Claim is for €1,030,000 potentially worth €900,000 to us.

So why is the Heading of this Post called BAFTA Awards?

BAFTA

B ecause
A nything
F actually accurate but not to the liking of someone will be removed.
T enacious Posters do not give up, they fight the system.
A stonishment that we are at nominal value for the past 15 days.

Awards

A ssuming we are different from other AIM Companies,
W hatever news we are awaiting, why are we ignored?
A nnounce the proper
R elationship with all our shareholders and investee companies.
D issatisfaction with perceived shenanigans
S culduggery? Never that is not his style is it?

RKB

PS will Netflix make a series on Clear Leisure? If so would it win an award?

Shauny91

LSE South East, when they changed the system last year were supposed to check the IP Address of numpties like you and prevent multiple accounts, obviously they (LSE) do not adhere to their own rules.

I have emailed Martin Lampshire at 11:36pm this evening and said that I think he should have a chat with Lucy Williams and also have a look at LSE South East.

RKB 2 Peterhouse 0

RKB

Is it sloppy? Was it intentional?

Either way it is RKB 1 Peterhouse O

RKB

Good afternoon Stavros23

You may want to purchase the Sunday Times today and have a look at the Business Section Page 8.

I would ignore most of the article (no disrespect to the author John Collingridge) but focus on the second last paragraph.

Copyright Sunday Times 19 January 2020 quote “His third venture is Ptarmigan which owns ‘half a Swiss valley’. The intention is to build a medical rehabilitation centre and leisure resort. Truell said it was on the cusp of reversing into a listed cash shell, Sabien". end quote .

RKB

PS I am not invested but I do watch Peterhouse Capital Ltd.

PPS Good luck all LTH.

Who is Vladimir Putin? Continued:

I believe that there are almost no checks or balances on the power of Vladimir Putin and that whatever his end game is he will achieve it.

As a private investor I have to be aware of geo-political world events in case they affect my portfolio. For example if I was invested in say an oil company and there was some local difficulty in say the Middle East then I would need to keep an eye and an open mind on “unfolding events.”

Earlier this month a General was allegedly assassinated at the hands (no morbid pun intended) of Donald Trump. Retribution was taken against American Assets and then there was an incident with a plane about two weeks ago.

As you know I play chess most nights before I go to sleep but my ipad is always on flight-mode so that I am not tempted or distracted by “news”. I knew that American Assets were attacked but it was a number of hours later when my wife said that a plane had crashed at Tehran airport. I immediately said “was it a Ukraine airplane?” That was my initial thoughts and my wife said I must have read the news on my iphone (I had not)

So why did I think it was a Ukraine airplane. Well logic said it will not be American Plane because they don’t go to that country. Also if it was in retaliation for America’s meddling then it would be unwise to attack a BA Plane as Boris would have just agreed to carry out Dominic’s instructions without blinking and pressed the button for Armageddon. Would not have been Air France Plane as they are in bed with them (the French do sleep around a lot as they think it is their birthright) Would not have been Lufthansa Plane as they long ago shared a common enemy so logic said to me Ukraine because Vladimir Putin said that it is a Win-Win. It avenges a perceived wrong and stops Armageddon and Vladimir Putin is King Maker (again)

So what is the point of the above? Well for 20 years oh sorry one week they hid the truth they thought they could get away with it but as the evidence was disclosed the world discovered what happened. It may have been an accident we will never know but the lies in the previous 20 years oh sorry past week were exposed.

RKB

PS Now you may find that it strange that I use Vladimir Putin in the above post and it may be only a coincidence that FG is also a director of Russian Art Promotion Ltd and it may only be a coincidence that when there are clouds in the sky it rains and likewise when the sky is cloudless and the sun is out at mid-day that it is a coincidence that it is warmer when the sun is not out.

Pandoras Box Part 6

Hello LtdAxis I have been told by a very good friend that I need to stop thinking I am playing a game of chess with FG as I don’t have sight of all the pieces but he does. He is correct but when I was in my early teens I used to play chess blind for about 15 or 16 moves and did not too badly as my opponent made some slip-ups as they were wondering what move I would make next.

So we have Brainspark PLC (Clear Leisure) and EasyArt Holdings and we have a Director Mr Judd, an accountant who was appointed to Brainspark Plc on 1/03/2001 and resigned on 5/02/2002 and he was appointed to EasyArt Holdings on 26/11/99 and resigned on 15/03/01.

Now some other Directors at EasyArtHoldings that I find interesting are:

Staffan Morndal (Swede) 4/07/08 – 23/01/13

Jakob Tolleryd (Swede) 4/07/08 – 19/01/12

Daniel Ahlstrand (Swede) interestingly 23/01/13 – 28/01/15 (Relay Race pass the baton but do not drop it, not just yet)

Marc Lickfett (Swede) 22/09/09 – still a Director!!!! So not severed the umbilical cord.

Johan Henrik Urban Aspen (Swede) 15/11/16 – 30/06/17

Myrna Frida Kristina Einarson Ohlsson 28/01/15 – 15/11/16

And finally who comes back? Mr Jasper Rayner Augusto Judd (British) 1/01/15 – 12/09/16

RKB

Hypothetically:

I do not know 100% that ForCrowd have sold any of their 54,218,847 shares. I can “guess” that some sales in December and January could have been sold by ForCrowd and I could “guess” that they have sold 13,609,317 and they would have received £34,998. I can also “guess” that if my guess is correct then on paper they would have had a loss of £12,390 and as per the agreement then their loss will be capped at 10% so we have to issue shares for 90% of their loss which is £11,151. If shares are issued at nominal value which is 0.25p or our current bid which is also 0.25p and believe it or not for each of the past 12 business days we have closed at 0.25p

I do not need to “guess” that shares will be issued to ForCrowd at 0.25p for their “loss”. This would mean 4,460,271 would be issued.

So would we see a change on our Shareholder Register? Well we do not do TR1’s so we either wait for an RNS saying FowCrowd have sold some and we have issued some.

FowCrowd had 54,218,847 less “guess” of 13,609,317 add 4,460,271 = 45,069,801 and shares in issue would be 666,831,718 (on the assumption that no other shares are issued at the same time like FG salary sacrifice)

This would mean ForCrowd would have 6.76% (6.7588%) so they would go down from their current 8.19% (8.1856%) There would be no major shareholders dropping below the 3% threshold (Vidacos Nominees Ltd, Luke Johnson or An Idea Lives on Ltd)

Now it has always taxed me as to why we agreed to the ForCrowd “get out of jail free card.” When re-reading the extension RNS from 16th December 2019 FG said “due to the increasingly close working relationship between the two companies, the directors of Clear Leisure have agreed that this extension will be of benefit to both parties.”

Taking a step-back and looking again, let us assume that whoever sold us the 20% of ForCrowd, did not have any cash (spare cash that they could put their hands on) they accepted shares in Clear Leisure and did not really want to sell any of their shares but if they did sell a few and got a few back along with some cash (like £34,998) then they would be able to take almost 10% of the Milan Digital Project (assuming you are an Italian Tax Payer) as per the rules of investing in this Crowd Funding Project of €500,000 (initial funding) Or they could take about 5% each of London & Milan digital twins project and technically they would not have had to dip into their Swiss Bank Account.

RKB

PS I estimate about 30% to 35% of the current shares in issue are with private investors and 65% to 70% are with Very Long Term Holders. You can’t always assume that AIM Rule 26 is accurate or up-to-date because the onus is on the shareholder to inform the Company that they have a disclosable shareholding and some people or companies do not think they need to abide by rules as they are only for the little guys.

Pandoras Box Part 5

Hello RKB

Yes they are connected with a common director at the time (and a lot more which will be revealed in further “Parts”)

Hello LtdAxis, well that is interesting that you know one of the directors of EasyArt Holdings in their re-incarnation.

There are four current directors there at present and who would have believed there was a DIRECTOR from Sweden.

RKB

PS You need to try to keep up re SWEDEN.

Pandoras Box Part 5

So RKB what are you implying?

Are you saying these Companies are connected?

Did they share anything else, like Directors?

RKB

Pandoras Box Part 5

EasyArt Holdings

Clear Leisure in its previous name of Brainspark invested in this unlisted company.

Brainspark Plc began life in a different name (Goodvend Ltd) and was incorporated on 9/02/2000 and had the Companies Address as 120 East Road London.

EasyArt Holdings began life in a different name (Deanrose Ltd) and was incorporated on 11/11/99 and had the Companies Address as 120 East Road London.

So only three months after EasyArt Holdings began we have the birth really of Clear Leisure.

RKB

PS only Posting little bits and all current information is in the public domain at Companies House but I don’t think they BoD, Broker, Nomad, PR Company and an Ex Director (CEO) will like what I Post.

PPS It would be pointless of me Posting if “proper news” is RNS’d but until then Pandora’s Box will be the next Netflix Series.

Pandoras Box Part 4

Good afternoon Linandy1

I would prefer not to have to go back to previous investments that have been made by our BoD but sometimes you can glean information that sets the scene for how a BoD may act in the future.

Looking at the 4 million sell this morning it was only 40 seconds after the 2 million buy!!! Now if you have access to Level 2 (I do not have L2) then you may have seen or had been alerted to the 2 million buy and then if it was say me or another large holder you would have to log-in to your account and you maybe could just about manage to execute a buy but the interesting thing is the ASK went up after the sell. Now I am not inferring that there was any jigger pokery and that there was any forward selling or that there is a willing large buyer but we have ticked up just a little.

Now if we were to receive news regarding if or if not we are receiving the money from the Mediapolis Land Sale then I would not need to go through EasyArt Holdings but as I have been frustrated at our depressed share price I have to do what I have to do.

RKB

Pandoras Box Part 3

So we believe ForCrowd are unloading up to €40,000 worth of shares and we can take an intelligent guess that the optimum price to sell to gain the maximum additional shares for the difference of 90% is 0.25p.

So hypothetically let us say I have this get out of jail free card and I sold say 5 million at 0.25p then I would have received £12,500. Also let us say I had bought these shares about the 18th December when two people bought at 0.344p (9:59am 500,000 and 2:11pm 2,906,976) but with charges I will say my actual cost was 0.3482p

Therefore my actual cost of my notional 5 million buy would have been £17,410 but I would have only received £12,500. So the paper loss would be £4,910 and 90% of that is £4,419. If I was able to buy at Nominal Value then I would get exactly 1,767,600 shares (note LtdAxis it is not 1,769,400)

Using this morning’s 4,109,317 the cost at 0.3482p would have been £14,308 so as they received £10,273 then loss would be £4,036 and 90% is £3,632 and you could get exactly 1,452,831 shares. In total you could get 3,220,431 (1,767,600 + 1,452,831) and have £22,773 cash in the Bank.

Now because ForCrowd had an extension to their window to sell some may say that has depressed our share price but surely no BoD or Nomad or Broker or PR Company would ever countenance that.

Why or what advantage is there to have a low share price? Answers to be sent to BoD, Nomad, Broker and PR Company asp.

RKB

Hello again Chriszzr

With regards to Nominee Accounts it is not straight forward. In the other share, I was over 3% a few years ago and I wrote to Nomad (a not very nice Nomad who lost their licence about 3 months after I challenged him at the AGM) and the Nomad and Company said as I held my shares in a Nominee Account with HL then it was “their” responsibility to inform the Company.

In 1989 I joined a Scottish Bank based in Glasgow and they insisted I transfer all my shares to their in-house Nominee Company called Nomco. I was not allowed to buy or sell any shares without permission of the Bank and if I did want to buy or sell it could take a few days and sometimes an interview with the Staff Bank Manager who was not the sharpest pencil in the Box.

About a year later the Nomco company were sent a section xyz (cant recall what it was called) and I had to agree to the Bank disclosing that I was the beneficial owner of my shares.

I don’t know if this is of any assistance but I wish you and all LTH well and hopefully you do achieve your RTO.

RKB

PS I still have Antos’s number and email but I would not give it out to anybody and Antos knows that.

Pandoras Box Part 2

It is crystal clear to me that ForCrowd have been unloading some of their shares. We know they were given an extended window to till the end of this month to unload up to €40,000 worth of shares and if they sold for less than what the shares were “given” at 0.3482p then the ForCrowd “person” (it is a person) will be issued with additional shares for 90% of the difference between the sale proceeds of the New Ordinary Shares and the value at which the New Ordinary Shares were issued to ForCrowd.

If all shareholders are treated equally then you have to ask, why were ForCrowd given this “get out of jail free card” and then given an extension? Was it in all our best interests?

Now we all know that forward selling is not permitted and I am not alleging there has been nothing untoward happening with our share price or anyone buying or selling but you have to remember our Nominal Value is 0.25p and if “allegedly” shares were sold below nominal value then that presents a dilemma because how do you calculate 90% say at 0.20p? (all to do with our 0.25p) So if I was the one with this get out of jail free card I would take an intelligent guess and say the optimum price would be to sell at 0.25p as it makes the calculations “easier”.

RKB

Pandoras Box Part 1

I have to post under a different Heading as it is odds on Posts will be removed. I have already written part 2 which is longer but you may want to take screenshots of some of the Posts as I have to put in information that “joins the dots”

Many years ago when our first child was born (a girl) I managed to “persuade” my wife to agree that our daughter and my wife had the same three initials. You may not think this is important to CLP but when you know the advantage of it then you start to think.

First say my wife and daughter are AAB then I could if I was so inclined ask a client to write a cheque to my wife “because I am busy and can’t get to the Bank” but if the cheque is written as “pay A A Bxxx then what is there to stop my wife depositing the cheque in our daughter’s account?

Second and a really important point, when we set-up National Savings Accounts on their birth (second daughter’s birthday today so I am time poor but this Post is taking precedence) you had to have the child’s initials on the account so as I set-up both accounts it said Mr R K Bxxx A/c AAB.

Now in certain countries under Nominee Accounts they have only initials and most countries (but not the UK) have the surname first and then only one other initial, so let’s say I have a Nomminee Account not in Switzerland but in SWEDEN then it would be designated “Pandoras Box B R”. Please note not R B but B R.

RKB

Who is Vladimir Putin?

I think most people know he is the “current” President of Russia and I think you may agree there are “limited” checks & balances on his power.

We are all invested in Clear Leisure (apart from LtdAxis, who may be in a good position to pick-up some of the “current” 5 million dump) and we have a Board of Directors (two) who act on our behalf (do they?)

Shareholders can hold Directors to account and normally they do this at the AGM and unfortunately very few attend or utilize their voting authority.

Who is RKB?

The three letters are my initials. I am not hiding, I am easy to find (even on Companies House) and I think most know that I live north of Hadrian’s Wall.

I set-out my “agenda” at my first AGM in front of the most attended AGM is Clear Leisure’s history, along with 12 or 13 other shareholders (one was a stooge for a previous CEO)

What changed after that AGM? Well the Nomad, changed, I can’t take credit for ZAI Corporate Finance being replaced but I think all present at that particular AGM would agree that ZAI were not acting on pi’s interests (I had to ask FG to either agree or disagree with a statement that Tim Coffman made) FG disagreed and that was the turning point for the AGM to unanimously have all resolutions passed. Then our Broker Peterhouse Corporate Finance resigned three months after our Nomad.

I had not liked our Broker and made my views known to the BoD and especially FG because our broker likes “warrants” and I think you may agree FG does not like warrants. So there are checks and balances that can be applied if you are prepared to “stand-up”

I am the type of person who does things on a “hand-shake” and as we await the dissipation of Tuesday’s dump before the next one I will take of the gloves if they dump.

RKB

PS Very Very disappointed about lack of confirmation of the receipt of the Land Money. So I will prepare another Post on Geosim which will also make your eyes look like Marty Feldman. This video does not really show his eyes or the really important bit at the very end and you will need to try and find out the next 5 seconds of the clip as it is important.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7CpkzJU9kA

Good Evening Chriszzr

We invested in this “company” but company is not the correct name to use.

We “lost” a lot of our investment and the alleged “loan” but we sold at a substantial loss but there was a similar “clause” when we sold like the one we had with Fortune Cookie”

Now if you were to delve deep you would find stuff which would make you have eyes like Marty Feltman (think that’s how you spell his name)

I will hold back what I have found out as all I am trying to do is support my investment and prevent our share price being held down.

If they dump I post.

RKB

oops 4:40pm

RKB