RE: Ratification?22 Oct 2020 23:23
OHS, I think there are two separate issues involved here. One is resolved and awaiting ratification (block 1) and then the other issue regarding Block 2A is saying the path has been cleared for Clon to recover the original co-ordinates (see below from Sept. 2019 RNS). If both are intrinsically tied together then the meetings may be to resolve this issue and all could be looked at together....just some thoughts but would be interested to hear other views from you guys? :)
Clontarf, and its partners, have also discussed with the authorities the possibility of working along with GNPC regarding the current 'Block 1' (subject to parliamentary ratification).
SEPERATELY we understand that Erin Energy Inc., a US company currently in Chapter 11, may soon relinquish or have abrogated that portion of the original Tano 2A acreage that Erin Energy Inc (formerly known as Camac Energy Inc.) was awarded in 2014 - which led to immediate legal action by Clontarf. This would open a path for Clontarf to recover all of the original 1,532km2 acreage.