Member Info for Riesgo

Lol. Many buttons pressed. No useful discussion as usual. Potty mouths to impress parents. A few good reasons to question assumptions rejected. Enjoy your restless night.
Follow Rippedtrousers advice and use the filter on/off

I can tolerate uncertainty, but it seems many think more will be revealed next week. I’m inclined to assume nothing new will be revealed. Will you sell when nothing new is revealed?

Captain Stan, very sensitive person. Never mind.

It seems we could have been told more early January. Why was such information held back? I’m concerned because every time I look at my box of LFTs in my junk cupboard I’m reminded they were sold to me as being the best because they used the exquisite Affimer and then finding out that in fact they contained the wrong antibodies.

Is it 2x, 5x, 10x? This is not a difficult question to understand.

For example; we are told Dox has been found in 6 out of 6 biopsies. Just like it is without AVA6k. But how much more is there than without AVA6k. Is it 2x, 5 x or 18x. No one needs a science degree to understand such data.

Sounds wrong to hold back price sensitive data for fund managers. Would AS do this? I doubt it.

Does it mean the same as exquisite?
The SD is for fund managers. Not scientific experts who scrutinise data. We had the RNS to update the market in December/early January.

But doesn’t want to, or see the need to, tell investors what data he has seen.

18 x in humans would be fantastic. But everyone has known about it for years. That’s when Timster probably heard it before.

Timster, I think 18 x relates to the animal studies from years ago. That’s when you probably heard it before.

Just counted 5 x 25k between 14:10 and 14:25. Nice.

Agree with you Barry.
I filter the potty mouths.

Will a dot be ok Goldie?

Seems a stretch of someone’s imagination. Agree we will probably see the glossed up information we already know as an RNS after the event, like the glossed up info for the scientists last year. But releasing price sensitive data that backs up glossed up info for fund managers after the event is definitely a no no. If to be released at 7am on the same day then why not say this is what will happen? But we were told information for the SD would be released early Jan. And it was.

‘Early Jan’ RNS should have contained new price sensitive data supporting his great claims. What was he thinking making such encouraging statements without a few numbers. Or even saying when the numbers will be made available to the market?

Makes me wonder why he didn’t share in the ‘early’ Jan RNS. That’s when he said he would inform investors, prior to the SD.

He must have data to share.
But when will he?

When afraid of being called bullies they sulk with a dot. Just like kids in a playground.

So, in addition to hearing ‘selected key opinion leaders’, as stated in the RNS, the fund managers will hear from additional independent experts. And because the independent experts will need to see price sensitive data then we will also see the extra price sensitive data before or on Science Day. That’s an interesting theory, which I hope is proven in practice.