Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Ha, maybe so. Let�s see what happens. Not too fussed if it dips as I wasn�t intending to trade it. Good RNS today, debt reduction, increased output and cash flow, oil strengthening, and a solid uptrend on the TLW chart since May. Also quite a bit of press pushing it as a 2018 recovery stock. So that was a buy for me. Still feel like a fish out of water on FTSE though :) stamp duty too!
Onwards and upwards please. I jumped on board today. Ughhh FTSE shares... bizarrely, to me, it feels more like gambling than buying an AIM share. It�s easy to work out the narrative and sentiment of an AIM share, but these FTSE behemoths... I never have a clue which way they�ll go :)
SouthC- Feel free to cut and paste my post, and date where I said that, but seeing as I haven't been invested in, or traded Rose for years, you will find you are mistaken.
I've lost money in the past, but you learn from your mistakes pretty fast. My point was that it's possible to make money as a trader on AIM without doing it shamelessly. I'm still invested in ZEN, and still believe the fundamentals and potential there is fantastic. They are building a great team, and progressing well, albeit with some delays, which have hopefully now been ironed out. I'm not trading it, so I'm not overly concerned it's been in the doldrums for a while, and happy enough to wait and see how the story unfolds.
SouthC - when did I say 'things will move fast'? I've posted here 4 or 5 times in the last 2 years and I'm not a fan of ROSE. I am merely intrigued by the patterns of posting here, and it's similarity to the MTV board you frequented, which you've not commented on. I'm, not even knocking shorters here. Shorters can only profit from a company that is fundamentally flawed. If ROSE was delivering they wouldn't be shorted. If MTV had actually had a viable product they wouldn't have been shorted. I'm not even aware either of these companies had/have been shorted - I was merely asking whats your deal, out of interest.
Yes there was an almost identical dynamic over on MTV. Including SouthC once again opposing a couple of rampers under different names. Similar styles of ramping there too, like an insane deluded tag team. I'm intrigued as to why though? I can't work out what the individual or group gets out of it. Impossible to short now, but maybe they managed to get spread bet shorts on a while back when it was valued quite a bit higher, and are now just creating some chaos and insanity to eventually help it down to 'sleep' Not that MTV needed much help. Or Rose for that matter. I don't really care, although I hate reading the shameless self serving ramping that was going on here and there. It's not hard to make money on AIM whilst still maintaining some sense of dignity and self respect, and respect for others too. These types of posters/rampers are no different to snake oil salesmen. Just conmen who'd rip off their own Gran.
if I'd heard I wouldn't have asked! What's the story? I'm just intrigued because the BB is bizarrely familiar to the late MTV's, plus there are clearly some posters here using multiple ids.
I'm intrigued, SouthC - why are you always to be found on the boards of these dog shares? 80 posts in the last month isn't just a few passing comments to try and help some misguided traders. It can't just be a hobby? Everyone who posts on these boards does so as they have some kind of financial interest in the company . Is it possible to short rose on IG? Surely not at such a low mcap? And why do some of the posters here remind me of the same inane manipulative lunatics that posted the most insane ramps over on MTV, before MTV imploded? It's like a strange pantomime that moves from board to board with the same actors, yet different characters.
I just mean AIM investors often have an irrational urge to recoup losses in the share they incurred the loss. You have £x capital remaining and you can invest this capital in any share on the market to recoup your losses. You need to pick the very best share that has the best potential to increase your capital. So rather than automatically thinking 'I must average down in share XYZ because I incurred a loss in XYZ' you have to think: is this the absolute best place for a return my capital? It might well be, but often there are fundamental reasons why the share price is tanking and there are countless other shares that might offer a better return.
There seems to be a strange mentality on AIM that you have to average down in the same POS share you made a loss... invest the capital into a company you think has the greatest chance of offseting your loss! If you think Rose gives you the absolute best upside opportunity of all the AIM companies to choose from, that's when you average down... (tip - it's not)
It's been pretty much covered here - that he'd met Koot for a long chat/meeting. He said Koot was extremely impressive. He doesn't believe Koot is going for regular AIM placings or open offers, but investment from a larger company for 20/30%. He also said he thinks it's going to happen soon.
Not really sure. I bought in when Koot was announced, so I'm very happy to see the rise, but not surprised with him at the helm, but there seem to be multiple credible rumours of deals going down, so that's what's driving the price.
Shares has Lenigas got? Anyone have a rough estimate? People have mentioned the possibility of Ritson selling, but isn't it more likely to be Lenigas, especially after his reaction on Twitter? If his ego is dented, which it clearly was, then he'd be the first to sell.
getrich - it was a bizarre series of tweet, so worth reading to see how ridiculous Lenigas is. Basically DL was saying - he'd never heard of Koot. Then seemingly rather offended that Koot is dutch. Saying he doesn't trust him (even though he previously says he has no clue who he is, doh) It came across as stupid, arrogant, and very much like his monstrous ego has been sorely dented by the fact the new CEO was in a different class to any of the Jermyn St mob. Koot is in a different league to Lenigas.
I've been doing dummy buys since market open and the price is slowly going down, not up, so why not wait for an upward momentum before taking more??
I'm doing dummy buys and the price is moving down not up....
Big - no different to the rubbish you are spewing forth on BOOM ;)
yes i get that a lot - get a price, click buy well within the 10 second countdown, and then it tells me the trade doesn't go through due to volatility!! argh.
Do you find you are really limited to how much you can buy or sell on iweb? - I break buys down into batches - say £5k each, but I can only ever buy or sell two batches of any share before it goes to negotiated trades and I can't get a price for a while...