Member Info for RegulatorUK

"Regulator has just revealed himself to all and sundry
Stick to your board meetings mate"

Gosh - I've revealed myself as someone who understands the law. How shocking!

Guess what... I also understand business. Who'd have thought it, eh?

"Regulator UK, I am accusing him of being very smart, bought at the lowest price and because of him I could buy 400k shares too. As I said, always follow the money going. You must benefit from it too, I guess."

Nice try - but that's not how your post reads...

@ acaciatan - You're accusing Trevor Brown of fraud. That's defamatory - and he's taken action against people who have libeled him in the past on this site. You might want to be careful about throwing accusations about without any substantive or cogent evidence.

"Already had 2 winners today only need Melodramatica 3.45lingfield for 3 doubles and a treble Then I'm buying more here"

I am somewhat embarrassed to admit that I've never won any bet on a horserace (that said, I've rarely place a bet)...

"Regulator - the only bulls**t is the stuff that comes out of your mouth. You are the most boring, smart ass know it all tw*t who actually knows fk all.

Mr NHS procurement (stationary orderer) Bore off and go and order some stationary for your boss or make him a cuppa. There’s a good boy."

Mr Illiterate and Inchoate Rant strikes again... I obviously hit a nerve.

"Regulator as you're aware transparency is everything. A company cannot keeping raising cash when they want, without explanation as to where the last lot of cash went too. Not like a trusted company."

I must assume that you know how to read RNS and accounts?

"Twatch- What's wrong can you only post when you are back in the office?"

I don't know if you can call his mum's basement an 'office'...

"Deramper! Kate I have lost more money in here than you will likely ever see in your life."

I'm calling bu11****!

"What makes you think they'll pass"

Probably because most real shareholders with an understanding of how investment companies function will support the approach of the board. Not everyone is a Winnifrith acolyte...

"green, not sure anybody can help you if you are not prepared to read the report yourself."

The only link you've given is to a Proactive Investors article from July last year - not a Financial Times forecast as the thread header suggests. Nowhere in the PI report is a share price of 16.69p mentioned.

So MisterGreen's perfectly reasonable questions remain unanswered.

"BTW P&O Ferries have nothing to do with us other than the DP World link - complete red herring."

P&O Ferries is a wholly owned subsidiary of DP World, and it was DP World that gave the orders for P&O to get rid of highly skilled UK workers and replace them with less qualifies/experienced staff on slave wages.

It is perfectly appropriate for shareholders to voice concerns over who the company is partnering with - particularly if that partner breaks the law and has dodgy business ethics. Such links can harm the reputation of the company and impact on share price.

That's the same DP World that owns P&O Ferries and sacked 800 workers illegally... and is potentially facing challenges to contracts it holds with the UK government (e.g. to operate freeports)...

Perhaps not something to crow about at the moment?

"I repeat.......the acid test is month-end when I'm expecting ODX to deliver on their last pertinent RNS....."

I'm not expecting any announcement around CTDA process (which is what was being referred to in the RNS - not the CE mark which we already have) other than perhaps confirmation that the final data has been submitted. UKHSA and MHRA are taking an exceedingly long time to make decisions. I'd be very surprised to see anything from them before the middle to end of May, particularly as we went into the pre-election period formally yesterday.

"TB always playing tricky games by showing buying power. Precaution his plan, do not believing any positive so far until share prices really back to 40p first stop."

Want to try that again in comprehensible English?

"I'm a LTH and sitting on a loss ATM
At 16p a share we probably all are."

Nope. LTH who is in profit. Thanks to the RMS divi last year I recouped my outlay and I'm now on a free ride.

Something's brewing and I intend to enjoy the ride!

"Regulator I wasn't referring to you either I think you may have understood"

Ah - OK. I presume you were responding to one of the green boxes that litters my screen. ;)

"Maybe so but I haven't lied or misled anybody"

Rest assured, I wasn't referring to you. We may not always agree but you're not the sort of person whose every post is little more than a defamatory rant...

"Regulator - nothing defamatory about what is being said. I don’t think any of this BOD would want to be arguing in court that they haven’t lied and misled investors, insider dealing, market manipulation etc. I am pretty confident they would lose"

You clear don't understand the law on defamation. The burden would be on you to prove your allegations - the BoD wouldn't have to prove, disprove or argue anything.

Given the very serious nature of the allegations you've made in recent weeks, both collectively and individually in relation to the BoD, the quantum and cogency of the evidence you would be required to adduce would be significant. You could also potentially face criminal proceedings for harassment.

Frankly, if I were LSE I'd not only remove your posts but ban you, in so doing mitigating the potential for a Norwich Pharmacal Order.

"Captain- Have you found a few more like minded posters to back you up.Some of them are becoming a bit close to the edge,let's see what happens."

Certainly seems to be at least one who doesn't understand the law on defamation...

"So, when making the 2020 comparison, are they including the 9 months when it was still private?"

Why wouldn't they? Whether the company was private or public makes no material difference to the revenue figures.