Member Info for Redirons

Thanks Paddy - been out all day and can’t believe I came back to find more slurs on GH’s name for apparently selling out. Can we all please stick to the facts such as TMT provides from Bloomberg and unless there is proof GH has sold anymore of his 40m holding then can we stop conjecture and speculation - Jeez leave the guy alone - he can sell what he wants when he wants, but please stop accusing him of doing so without providing the proof he has. Thanks for the positive posts today - we all have so much to look forward to and hopefully all will become clearer by September - Good luck all fellow Greatlanders!!

I’m fed up with arguing about standards and ethics on this Board - I will let this go now and will just hope that the Board does not descend to those demonstrating the lowest levels (Bully and Daveri007 for example)

Rubbish Bully - it is unselfless because they share the very research (that takes them hours no doubt) with everyone else on the Board. Wouldn’t hurt you to say thank you for that?

Many Thanks Paddy (and Bottle and Bamps) - great unselfless work again!!

It’s like banging my head against a brick wall - I didn’t ask you to apologise to me - I suggested you should apologise to the Board and to GH for your misleading and inaccurate insinuations on GH’s selling record. Either you’re man enough or you’re not.

You weren’t posting the obvious 007 you were giving it large, showing off that you know more than others when in actual fact you were misleading and inaccurate and at worse undermining the reputation of our previous CEO. No apology then??

Very clear TMT and thanks - the difference between accurate posting and a misleading one!!

You don’t get it do you 007 - you’ve just admitted that your previous comments were speculative about whether GH is selling out because you are now asking “what if I’m right and GH is selling his complete position”. You have just been outed for posting scandalous inaccuracies because you don’t actually know what GH has sold if at all, do you?? If I were you I would post an apology to the whole Board and to GH admitting you know nothing about GH’s selling record and you have unfairly insinuated that he is selling out of GGP altogether. But of course you won’t apologise will you, but I can just hope you will stop giving it large in future and will think about the accuracy of what you post BEFORE you post it, because I WILL pick you up on it!!!

Scandalous conjecture and speculation - that’s why I outed 007 to either prove it is fact or to stop posting inaccuracies.

Laughable that you do not think posting inaccuracies about our former CEO continuing to sell out his shares is less damaging to our SP than my comments outing your scandalous posts.

You’re absolutely right NoTrader - I will not respond to Dave Bond directly but his posts tonight are scandalous. Does he know for sure that GH is selling any of his remaining 40m shares, or is he just purposely insinuating that GH is selling out - in my opinion this is inaccurate and designed to unnerve and/or assist in the drop of the SP - unless he can prove that GH has sold any more shares recently, he ought to just button it imho!!!

Still don’t buy it Bully as there should at least be a consistent pattern formed if what you’re saying is that the SP moves purely on what buys or sells occur before it. Our SP movement has borne no relationship to buys or sells. Whilst I don’t buy the “dark pools” theory either, I do believe manipulation has been applied to GGP that may be favouring selected buyers in the background. It’s the only thing that makes true sense of our SP movement this year. I would have bought your explanation on how we moved last year (as being formulaic) but not this year. Anyone else have thoughts??

If the SP movement was purely down to computer algorithms it would be far more consistent/translatable/predictable according to economics of supply and demand. Our SP goes down when buys outstrip sells continuously and consistently for most of this year. You can’t tell me (Bully boy) that this is down to a computer with no human intervention!!

So MM’s don’t make the market??

The volumes are well down today so far and if the MM’s are supposed to create a market if only for their own incomes, then surely they have to ring the changes. Constantly driving the price between 19 and 23p is hardly very imaginative is it??!! Look at the volumes last year when they drove the price up from 1.5p to 37p - come on MM’s use a bit of intelligence!!!

Spot on Newhaven and Bamps - we can rest assured that Newcrest would not be wasting any time, effort or cost in drilling like mad at Havieron if they hadn’t already considered the logistics required in getting the ore to Telfer for processing. This will happen and I dare say they will reveal just how in due course. No point drilling for minerals that can be Telfer’s saviour unless you know it is economically sound to do so and just look how fast they are drilling - hitting Gold with every drill as Sandeep said recently!!

Hi Kieffy - I think you are spot on with this. The MM’s are doing some big favours for someone or some II’s or other by suppressing the SP low enough and long enough for them to fill their boots - that’s how it seems to me and just a shame they can get away with this. I know others state that as we are non-income producing that our SP is at the right level for now, but I disagree. This is SP manipulation if ever I saw it and I have been in Finance for decades. I do believe it will right itself eventually but just hope that will be sooner than later. NCM are certainly not hanging around!! VGLA Greatlanders - the future is bright!!!!

Hi Mush - your thoughts are very similar to mine - disbelief and frustration at what has happened this year combined with dogged commitment to holding my position until sanity returns to the SP (hopefully soon!!) I will keep my eye out for anything coming up over in Stroud and will support it if I possibly can. Best regards to you and yours - come on GGP!!!

Please God Fc please God - it otherwise just feels so fake as to be very concerning!! Just wish the FCA would regulate Aim!!!

I agree not wholly accurate but 10m buys versus 4m sells - they’re not going to be that blatantly inaccurate surely, otherwise no point posting the fundamentals. No sorry, there is more at work here as to why the SP never follows basic economics!! Thanks for trying to explain though!!