Member Info for redindi

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/41585/euro-ncap-automated-driving-2018-ds7-crossback-datasheet.201810171431524458.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjV8v3J1KThAhUfSxUIHUW9CfcQFjAFegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw3ReyiJRD1YeGS1UPNRKs0I

DS7 is hands on steering wheel.

It's at least a year old, in house maybe

Fair enough Hyms

RAC seem to agree with the benefits of DMS - https://media.rac.co.uk/news/rac-comments-on-eu-plan-to-make-advanced-safety-features-mandatory-on-vehicles-from-2022-363562

ET So do shysters...

S7 So Martin doesn't know SEE has future models as from 2021 and therefore won't be in all BMWs as the article infers and readers may accept as word verbatim? Similar to people accepting our directors when they use very conservative metrics to come to the conclusion, for public consumption, that SEE will not be profitable until 2023. Both are wrong and eventually, if both remain as independent companies, the market will see that.

S7 £4-8 a car is very expensive, ask BMW. And, yes, it is oversold, with a product that by all accounts doesn't do what it's supposed to do, ie in some circumstances such as over 40mph. It might as well be a £ a car and probably will be, being as it in the convenience sector.

S7 Err, excuse me, he knows it has LOST BMW. If creating customer value includes creating a bubble (ie disingenuous) fair enough. Admittedly our lot totally undersell SEE.

https://www.di.se/bil/genombrott-for-smart-eye-borsraketen-har-kontrakt-med-sex-bilmarken/

Seems to have cut his view on market share to 40/, still more than Ken. And, no Martin, you won't be given all BMW models. It seems that being economic with the truth is quite widespread.

And appear to be working during our day here, wonder where our our ex-service people are today? 14964

Volvo is talking to insurers about reductions for drivers who use the system. Now, that is interesting!

Alex Roy's take on it - @AlexRoy144 Clickbait by ⁦ @vtanger ⁩ uses Tesla’s misleading and disingenuous language, fails to mention SAE levels, gets the regulatory hurdle wrong, is more self-driving drivel contributing to public misunderstanding.

isb It was Kevin Tanaka in the Hansen Report.

Phil It's SEE and it's closely held belief that the auto market won't allow more than one provider more than 30% of any particular market. That's ok if you have more than 3 providers but falls flat when there's only 1,maybe 2, providers. In the future, quite probably there will be but in the short to medium term, very debatable. In the meantime, SEE keeps on giving out false guidance, it needs to wake up.

S7 I seem to recall from Nick D's Autonocast interview that it was in discussion (pre FCA) with all existing OEM's about putting Fovio in all models (or some more) and that price was the main talking point, so yes, new RFQ's would be required. Nick said all so of GM, BMW, Mercedes and Ford (Byton is probably all accounted for) which one is visible RFQ wise yet? Also, its interesting (as Terry pointed out) the value of the 8 possible post June RFQ's, the average minimum contract size is just under A$4 million more than those currently at RFQ. Maybe a pointer to the SPREAD and scope of DMS?

S2020 I'd agree 10 is a good place to start from, and Nissan may be the one that doesn't drop (RNM and Kevin T's interview point to 4 of the Big 5 in Japan) but the order may vary slightly. January's trading update mentions 6 (now 5 after FCA) in North America, Asia and Europe. The first is sorted, leaving Asia and Europe for the other 5? It then goes onto state it has sight of 3/4 RFQ's in the second half, one of which is with an existing customer for a further 9 models (GM/Cadillac). Obviously, SEE is now aware of 8 as from the second half, the wording ain't great so maybe Cenkos has inadvertently got the timing mixed up but in the end it will be ten or so whichever order it's in.

Hyms The RNS says in 2020 and to be recognised in FY2021.

EU legislation that is