Member Info for Redceo

Oli. Ever heard the term "glutton for punishment" :-))

Oli, "Tomolo, that's a great breakdown"

Yes very clear thanks.

NEWD "i treat others the way i want to be treated, i cant stand the overly agreeable types"

I wouldn't class myself as overly anything. I'm pragmatic. Your Crude message elicited the response it received.

Your best ignored on anything not related to I. D. S.

Of course not Anger and I never have. Now your account details have no ties to your true identity anyway.

This is our last conversation Anger Shark. Pity you weren't able to reform.

We know what was said Anger Shark. I reluctantly gave you a second chance and kept my side of the agreement. But you have to behave this way and blame others. You didn't close your account to protect yourself from perverts etc. You bottled it when told by another member that your hate speech was cause for legal action and that they had a family contact that would facilitate such action.

Within the hour your account was closed. No doubt your account details linked to your true identity.

You closed your account but the threat was made by another whose posts are filed here.

In case you have genuinely forgotten ANGER this was the post from Phunt73 :-

You definitely said you had 50k equity in your house when you were trying to insult someone as usual. Because Redceo laughed at you and said his greenhouse was worth more and I said my car was worth nearly that and you asked what I drove. Remember fella? I would say we could go back and check if you like but we can’t can we because you had to delete your whole embarrassing 4000 posts in one year account. And here you are back to your old tricks and just doing the same old cr@p. I’m sure you had intentions of starting a fresh and being a better person but it’s just not possible for you is it, you horrible little man. Seriously get a grip of yourself.

Before posting my response on the day I stated that although I had no time for PHUNT. My innate honesty dictated that my recollection of you boasting that you had £50k equity in your home was exactly as he stated. You were denying the post and as PHunt had truthfully referred to my response I felt honour bound to speak up. Goodbye ANGER until the next time.

Anger Shark. I was in fact responding to PHunt regarding a post in which he mentioned me. I was quite simply confirming my agreement. You have taken offence because he and I agree as to what was said which contradicts your statement.

As for your threat to me, I would never use the V sign. However it does rather encapsulate my thoughts.

And then when asked if you’d like conversation to remain friendly stick two fingers up

NEWD, Yes, idle chit chat and perceptive viewpoints being opposite ends of the spectrum. Somewhere in between is the nastiness that we could really do without.

I look forward to your finding sufficient reason to once again contribute at a level more in keeping with your intellect. Apologies if that sounds groveling but I have no problem acknowledging strengths and weaknesses.

NEWD - "it was merely a thought that crossed my mind"

Ah! responded without due consideration, enough said

NEWD. Once again I find your comments rather strange.

I have no problem commenting when I find someone to be unpleasant. Likewise when someone has class.

However in your case you wear so many hats that it's difficult to categorise. Pleasant, Informative, Crude, Ridiculous. Quite the Enigma!

JB. Judging by your posts and the manner in which you conduct yourself here. I imagine you earned every penny you received during your tenure with RMG. The fact of a decent pension is icing on the cake.

I understand and agree with your thinking. Shall not comment further on the thread in question.

Oli "then there is the problem of the aging fleet which will require electrification in the near future"

Seems a bit OTT. Some of those postie's have given their best years. :-(

A parting word :-

Excellent!

248.60 GBX +7.10 (2.94%)today

6 Sept, 11:37

I have delayed my tree cutting by a few minutes because I was interested to see how you responded.

I was actually pleasantly surprised at the vast improvement that you accomplished after your scare.

So much so that I wondered if another had taken your place. Few things are as they seem in life these days and I doubt we shall know.

Unless of course the individual that scared the pants off you decides to return. After all you have gone downhill fast so let's all sit back and wait.

I gave you the benefit of the doubt Anger. I was as you could see fully supportive. Unfortunately you let me down. More importantly you have let yourself down.

With regard your obvious threats. My shoulders are broad. Shame, I really hoped you could do as you stated.

As IDS discussion seems to be an "also ran" here this morning. I think it's time to finish this cuppa and cut some branches (No I'm not CEO of Tesco)

Bit hot for the GREENHOUSE!

Despite having no time for PHUNT! I am unfortunately very honest. My recollection of the discussion in question is as he stated.

SoRo, Not quite how I might have put it but can't disagree ;-)

Behave boys this squabbling has had it's day here. Golfdinger I think however the point was being made that your information on penny shares isn't required on the IDS platform.

Oli, Do you honestly believe the new CEO could ever see "eye to eye" with the CWU regarding the USO?

It could however possibly be achieved if the CEO was either Darren Jones or Our Del Boy.

CWU "The UK operation is capable of making a decent profit again but it's going to need the right people at the top making the right decisions but it's not going to happen overnight that's for sure.

The Communication Workers Union (CWU), which has accused Royal Mail of “waging war” on staff undertaking strikes over pay and conditions, said employees’ views must be taken into account when making any changes to the USO.

“It is absolutely vital this takes into account the views and experiences of postal workers across the UK,” said a union spokesperson. “They have witnessed the deliberate dismantling of the USO and the destruction of quality of service over a sustained period of time.

“The CWU will play a full part in the review and our position isn’t about opposing change for the sake of it but about focusing on protecting the postal services of the UK.”