Member Info for Redceo

412.20 GBX -8.80 (2.09%)today

Fishcake
"Hope this answers the question"
Many thanks. It does indeed and excellent first post.

Ponty. Good to hear your positive response.

Ponty.
When you say "revisions taking place" is it your opinion that these will be accomplished despite the obvious objections to come from some ?

I was actually thinking more of past Chief Executives. The current CEO has indeed got off to a good start. Time will tell of course.

It seems to be that RMG needs sorting out. However any CEO that takes the initiative comes up against a brick wall and history repeats itself.

Nuri.
Was it not the case that you used the money in your new investment a Hotel/Bar.
Maybe not so much the lack of belief in Aviva, more a belief in your new venture which hopefully is bearing fruit?

Anthony Fitzpatrick interviewed on B.B C. Talking Business. Anything that flies the flag for Aviva is useful.

Oli. On the other hand maybe there was also an element of Mr Back thinking, I have a ton of money and shares, Covid is making life very dodgy, and this lot are a right pain, Do I need this, NAH!

Pottyp
A new face here and sensible comment.
No need to be concerned where I'm concerned.
I find it quite worrying though that people capable of such thoughts are walking our streets.
Enough of that though. What brought you here

;-)
Scamp, you and I have crossed swords many many times previously. Enough times for me to know your modus operandi. Can't be bothered to engage you currently but don't worry we will in due course when you muster enough support. Have a pleasant evening

Anger:
I am content to know that my earlier drawing you out from beneath your rock was a worthwhile exercise. EVERYONE! can see what you are. It might suit some to encourage you but the decent individuals amongst us will steer well clear. That includes me.

Anger:
I am content to know that my earlier drawing you out from beneath your rock was a worthwhile exercise. EVERYONE! can see what you are. It might suit some to encourage you but the decent individuals amongst us will steer well clear. That includes me.

Angry.
Your not even worthy of filtering so be it.
Read your past messages ridiculous losses with your stock being taken out when they decide to gobble your stops up. Your words also most of your holdings in the red. Yet you seek to talk down to others here.

Ball's in your court. Angry

Anger. Must admit not my nature to turn the other cheek where your kind are concerned. For an indication count the number of members you have already insulted here during your very short tenure.
Continue responding to my posts as you did, or walk away

No need to respond it was a rhetorical question.

So a serious question. If you had moved on why respond to my posting what I thought was a useful item of RMG news in the way you did.
To clarify it was an identical item to that later posted by commonsense which they thought to be worthwhile reading.
Your response to me was :-
Thanks for copying and pasting that old news Redceo, we’d be lost without you

Actually the post should have contained lots of smiley faces unfortunately the software converted them in posting to lots of question marks ???.
This changed the meaning which was not me querying but my amusement at you sucking up.
You were sussed out from early days. You will fit into a certain group here just perfectly.

Anger "thinks this was posted previously" ?????????? to remind him of his response to my posting the item.
"Thanks for copying and pasting that old news Redceo, we’d be lost without you"