Member Info for red_hornet

Anomaly, I’m only replying to correct your errors. If it’s boring and sucking the life out of you, why reply?

“But repeating ‘93% down’ like a parrot isn’t analysis, it’s just arithmetic”

It’s a fact, I said it once! Maybe work on your arithmetic?

“On the CMD/fundraise point, I’ve already said it was clumsy. The board said one thing, then raised straight after.”

Clumsy (LMAO) – clumsy is subbing your toe, issuing

“But to call it a ‘breach of FCA regs’ is you overreaching again — if the NOMAD or the FCA thought it was a breach, you’d have seen consequences by now. You haven’t.”

Overreaching how exactly?

So you’re saying you know the NOMAD and FCS have check this meeting? Amazing, I wouldn’t have thought they’d have the resource to check every single company event taking place in the UK 365 days a week.

“you when you’re still wheeling out the same CMD gripe years later?”

Years you say, the CMD was in March!!

It's easy it continue the debate when consulting the facts and news vacuum surrounding PHE!! Copy and paste from John's post, saved me time writing the LOLs. Funny though, as you'd rather take issue with that than the actual point of you watching your investment drop 93% from 8p to barely more than 1/2p. Displaying little ability to argue with that fact.

Even your point on what is said at the CMD is fact and noted for for public record is weak, when the biggest news was no extra funding was needed. That was met with high praise and relief on this board, only to be followed 12 hours later by an RNS addressing money had since been raised, which was clearly a pre-packed deal.

Again little comment or objection from you on the CEO and BOD's actions there. Surely a much bigger issue to address a breach of the public record and probably of FCA regs than winks and laughing faces.

No? Go easy target, because you've lost the debate and run out of anything new, positive, worthwhile, factual or even interesting to say about PHE!

Anomoly, "when your counter-argument boils down to a string of LOLs, it says more about the quality of your debating than the share price."

It was a pi55 take of your mate Jon Swarbricks previous post LOL ;)))

Unfortunately for PHE a lack of tests, trials etc, funding, realistic partners and timescales.

If there's anything in the DMG principle and SAF, I'd imagine much larger organisations are on to this.

If not, and PHE have some exclusive (unlikely) then they could probably be gobbled up for about 1p a share.

"And no, I’m not wound up because Tom ‘called it.’ He’s been predicting collapse since 7p, 3p, 1p"

And he was correct, everytime!!

Boltons finest, John Swarbrick has been predicting the total opposite at every turn - LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL - I know who I rather have backed.

"buyers in control" anyway LOLOLOLOLOL

Anomoly, you fail to answer the fact or question; instead you highlight my jokes as a serious point and ignore the substance you can't demonstrate!! Where does it say PHE have to put an RNS out if they test a different feedstock sourced internally!

Yes, we know they're testing 3rd party Feed, that's a given! How many companies are involved in this, 1 or 10? It makes a significant difference to what has and is being put through the FTU !

If they only have 1 or 2 companies are interested and provided Feedstock, PHE will have to source everything else themselves. At no point does that require an RNS!!

At no point do PHE need to RNS anything, if they decide test more feedstock themselves. What utter nonsense!!

Do they have to RNS is they decide to switch coffee brands?

Don't forget, PE said no fund raise was needed at the CMD. The following day.....a pre-packed (pre-organised) fundraise was announced.

Are you still wound up because Tom W called PHE for what it was while you thought it better to watching your investment collapse to 0.006p

"Red, this isn’t my opinion—it’s what was stated at the AGM. Paul Emmitt confirmed the FTU commissioning and customer feedstock runs. You didn’t make yourself known there, so I’ll assume you didn’t attend."

So what was said 6 months ago is still gospel. Nothing in that 6 months has changed. Not sure what businesses you've worked in, but throughout my career, consulting with many businesses, things tend to be a bit more fluid.

As I pointed out yesterday, they have included in the SP Angel report that they can recycle all waste plastics, MSW waste (includes BB waste, RDF SRF), E Waste, Bio Mass, Tyres and Hazardous materials - the latter being a very specialist area and with huge number of varied and dangerous products included.

Not sure interested 3rd parties have come forward and provided all of this waste? Although they did post a couple of funny Linkedin posts ask companies to come forward :)))

My 'guess', as that's what we're both doing, is they've had to source a lot of these materials themselves to be able to put it in the report. Or they've put it in and don't know if the kit can actually process these.

Well Swazers did say about 6 months ago, that Shell and BP would be knocking on PHE's very soon.

Related industry news Anomoly, all relevant as to how they interact and affect each other. Sorry you didn't like the piece, but if you actually read around the news relating to SAF, you'll have a better understanding of the problems and costs that are affecting the industry as a whole.

Others might appreciate the read, it's not you private forum!!

I'm sure PHE's tiny project with Avioxx will be completed by 2030 and they'll be able to contribute a couple of tonnes to the worlds targets ;)

Sorry Anomoly, I can't find where it says this? "If people want croissants, lager at 10am, and three hours of short-seller sermons."

Is that part of the official advertising for the event?

You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about it.

Anomoly "Who care's" - maybe people on this board do. You don't, but that doesn't mean no one else does.

Anomoly - "Yes, some companies publish in-house data. Others don’t, especially when trials are tied to customer agreements. PHE has chosen the latter path. You can dislike that approach, but it’s not up for debate whether it’s happening—it is."

This is just more opinion. You have no idea how much testing has been carried out by PHE, just as you have no idea how much has been done with customers.

Sorry, but what you're saying is your opinion of what has / is happening, not facts, as you're making it sound. For all you know, since the fund raise, PHE could have decided to spend a small fortune on their own testing, but forgot to tell you.

Have you ever been to the event Anomoly? You seem to a very strong opinion on it. Or is more that Tom called PHE's decline and you didn;t?

Seems like a worthwhile event, also sold out.

Beggars can't be choosers.

𝗦𝗛𝗘𝗟𝗟 𝗔𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗢𝗡𝗦 𝗧𝗔𝗞𝗘-𝗢𝗙𝗙 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗦𝗨𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗝𝗘𝗧 𝗙𝗨𝗘𝗟

𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 '𝘁𝗼𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲' 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗴𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘁

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/f1c6e087dc1fc1be

Why is Tom Winnifrith not a fan of PHE?

All in your opinion of course, as you do not know this as a matter of fact.

I'm well aware of many other companies in various industries that have and do release results following in-house testing; so you can't apply a catch to any specific industry or specific company where this top secret approach applies. It's how you see things, but it far from a FACT!

There's a growing insistence on here (especially swazers), the only testing that has been carried out, is third part testing and therefore it can not be shared with the public or even a market report about the company; which is probably the case.

But that means having developed and built this system, PHE have decided to not test anything themselves (even out of curiosity if it works) and only tested it with third party Feedstock.

I find it impossible to believe that!! In fact, I'd say it's complete rubbish is simply an excuse from the rampers as to why there's no test results available.

This is funny "The FTU was never intended to be a public demo unit" - except they had an open day for the public.

I'm sure PHE did their own tests during the hot test and probably a lot since then. They need to know it's performance on every type of FS, I doubt they've had many 3rd party customers knocking the door down.

If you look at the SP Angel report, they state you can put anything in their DMG, including the kitchen sink!

John Swarbrick, AKA Swazers - I’ve a clear conscience and can look myself in the mirror, which is more than can be said for you.

You’re a disgusting excuse for a human being as far as I’m concerned. You make up total garbage, twist information and post it as fact! Even the below isn’t true, but you post it as such.

You tried to make a living from this and it failed, leading to your company being liquidated!

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13162604/filing-history

In my opinion, there’s bound to be people who have invested more money or left money in this share when they should have sold, because of all you baseless ramping. What happened at 9p, 8p, 7p 6p…. When you said the company was ready make good on its hard development work 😂😂

Why not tell us all the reasons every prediction you’ve made on this has been wrong.

Given your track record of getting the momentum of the share price staggeringly wrong, I doubt anyone is listening to you anymore.

I’m a big believer in Karma, so I’m sure it’ll catch up with you soon enough!

Packaged for storage?

Constructive - I'm sorry, but this is nonsense. "Should be more news between the 11th & 15th this month. Judging by CEO & Board members recent share purchases."

Can you explain why without referencing anything relating to a closed period?