Member Info for red_hornet

Sorry, I can’t not comment on the jealous of you and bob comment. It’s a sickening thought being you, TBH

I think I might post a message on the general LSE forum page and see just how much Swazers love there is.

Whenever your name used to pop up on other boards, it was always followed by a barrage of abuse towards you; why? Because you’re so wonderful and successful?

I wonder what the comments would be to such a post on the general forum? I see that’s why you’ve had to stop posting on all other forums, because of everyone just takes the pi55 out of you!!

John Swarbrick / Swazers, if you want to send me your company accounts and I’ll have a look and see where it all went wrong and why you went insolvent and shut down the company.

Doesn’t look like you owned HMRC anything, as you didn’t earn enough.

Surprised really if you called all them right???

Or is it that you called this so badly wrong for 10 years, it’s skinned you. Shame buddy!!

Are you on a late at the sorting off tonight 😉🤣🤣

swazers - you’re a liar!! that post is utter garbage!

i’ve been invested in crypto mining for a long time and the second coming, isn’t happening! you won’t ever seeing mining prices like they were end if 2021.

wulf was $40 back then, not the $11.40 it is now!

clsk, mara, riot, btbt etc and so on will never get to where they were back then. most sp’s are pretty much the same as 12 months ago, wulf is an except, not the rule. the last btc halving crippled mining and the next one will kill it.

main reason i got out of mining, was there’s only a couple of million bitcoins left to be mined anyway, and the cost of doing so is going up while the reward will half in 2028, long before phe could even get planning for a dmg, let alone build one!!

don’t believe me, research it or ‘ just ask’ michael saylor 🤣 even he thinks bitcoin mining is dead!! what does he know?

fyi - most of the remaining mining will eventually be done by country’s who own their own energy supplies, like saudi etc, as they can mine and not worry about the cost.

why do you think most miners started keeping btc treasuries from their mining operations, rather than selling it all?

it makes me laugh how you think you can post **** and assuming no one is going to know more than you. this is utter misdirection and lies from you!!

yes, that still leaves data centres, but do you honestly think trump will have the us spending money on an unheard of green tech from a company in wales, when he’s backing ‘drill baby drill’

wake up swazers, bolton deserves better than this rubbish.

Swazers, I’ve been invested crypto mining a long time and have sold out.

Anomaly - any thoughts on funding.

Swazers - "Enter Powerhouse Energy’s DMG® system" - what a laugh!! Can't believe you write this nonsense Swazers, or can I!!

More chance of Castle getting to the moon in his emoji rocket!!

If any of the BTC miners or data centres were interested in using recycled plastic to provide H2 or electricity, they'd already be doing it.

Why don't you call Bolton Council and see if they want one? More chance of that happening than crypto miners getting involved in PHE's DMG tech!!

Anomaly, you mentioned PHE are no different to of tech businesses, but most of these have a funding model for the next 2 to 5 years! So, what are your thoughts on PHE's plans, or in the absence of any information provided, what are you thoughts of what they will look to do?

“Daily volumes on AIM are noise” – where did you come up with that nugget of nonsense? How many times do we see shares jump 300% on a positive RNS. Better than expected performance from the FTU and everyone here is rightly pointing that out, even you!

So you would expect more than £40k of shares to have bee bought in a day!!

Why not?

Why aren't people buying?

You need to cut the childlike replies out, it's making you look stupid. Most of your posts have a heavy content of name calling, then you jump on someone that gives it back to you. Hypocrisy at it’s best :))

Not my fault you and Swazers are so underwater here. Just sell up and put the money in to something else. Plenty of opportunities in Crypto. I sold all my mining stocks and put it in to SOL and ETH, which have moved up nicely. BTC is a bit steep for me now, as I see better % growth in other areas / coins.

Choose right and there’s money to be made in UK and US treasuries!!

Each, you're just hiding behind that because you've nothing to say on the matter.

If you have, just post it and don't discuss anything. I'm interested in your thoughts.

Anomaly, does that make Swazers your Robin, or is he Batman? Maybe Rodney to your Delboy!!

Anyway, He's the one that loves the LOL's - on repeat!!

If the news is so great, why were only £40k shares were bought today? It's a fair point from TP3, regarding the need for clarification on the wording of the HYR. Todays isn't better, as it could be very clear and just say they have been testing feedstock from potential customers, but don't, so read what you want in to that.

EACH - I'm a pragmatist, not an idealist! I see not one person has commented on the financial situation. In terms of SP movement, I would have thought it's a massive question mark for anyone looking to invest.

Any actual thoughts on it, or are you ignoring it / can't think of anything to say?

£38,000 worth of shares bought today

The inhouse results do look promising.

"This includes running various "real-life" waste streams for potential clients and experimenting with different operating conditions to tailor syngas composition for applications beyond hydrogen production." - As always, the comment is ambiguous. It reads as though they're doing the testing themselves on feedstock that they can present to potential clients; not that they're working with any potential clients or have tested a clients feed.

I guess it's open to interpretation, but if they are testing potential clients feedstock, you'd expect it to say that, otherwise they've totally missed an open goal, for example.....'we are working with potential clients, and conducting 'real life' trials with their waste streams.........blah blah!!

Lets hope they are working with potential clients and are charging to do these tests, as they need the profit to avoid having a raise more money in the coming months.

Hey Anomaly - You’re kicking your next chapter off with another make-believe scenario. Don’t come whining to me about TP3, take it up with him.

Now, pay attention! No one is disputing what PE said at the CMD, not me anyway. Just as you can't disputed that the company felt it necessary this week (6 months later), to use the wording 'Once fully commissioned' in an RNS HYR.

Don’t accuse me of spinning anything, I’m just repeating what is there in black and white. You on the other hand, refer to it as ‘corporate speak’. Secret code only highly intelligent people like yourself can understand, while offering the board special immunity form criticism and questioning ;))

And enough of your strawman nonsense, you sound ridiculous!

You don’t even know if PHE have NDA’s with anyone. You've made that up.

You also take PE’s word at gospel, well he won’t be the first or last to not be 100% truthful on the detail. Only 6 months ago he decimated the SP on the back of a lie.

“Financials? They’re exactly what you’d expect from a tech company in development.” Don’t disagree, just asking where the next £2 million is coming from and the £2m after that? Or is that banned here, certainly will be in your little TG group :))) How dare you ask about funding past November!!

FYI - Project finance is exactly that, phased project financial support, not for keeping the lights on at HQ!! So I suspect the only funding option that’s realistic, is more dilution.

Happy to hear your actual thoughts on the business (facts), rather than childish insults which intermate you have nothing in the tank!!

A speaker slot with be good for their profile.

What do you think....?

Cheers Each, I did, turned out well.

There could be a good buy-in opportunity here in a few months, around a price of circa 0.002p, based on the below:

The pre-tax loss for 6 months widened to £1.8 million, so potentially £3.6m for the year.

The average cash burn is potentially £300k+ / month

£1.47m cash at bank

10 weeks on from the end of June, means this could actually be £870k now, so there’s a risk the money could run out by the end of November.

Just what the HYR report indicates. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a dip here tomorrow.

Anomaly - Going off at tangents, creating silly scenarios, childish comparisons, resorting to name calling and attacking people’s intelligence, simply demonstrates your lack of ability to justify your comments; as well as your debating skills.

We know for a fact, not everything PE said at the meeting was 100% correct. Your argument is based around, because he said it, it’s a fact? Not a single chance that he shouldn’t have said it, it was misleading, ambiguous or just wanting to be positive because they were behind schedule.

We have to take as gospel what he and you are saying? I’m sure others can see that perhaps there is a flaw to this situation!

“And your idea that the company should casually publish customer feedstock details to “bolster the HYR”? Laughable.” – I didn’t say that did I? It’s unrecognisable to what I actually wrote. Try and do better.

“As for your ‘income if it ran 24/7’ nonsense….Nobody ever said the FTU was a revenue facility” – Actually a few people on this forum did say what a good idea it would be, to help generate income. So, take it up with them, not me!!

“And just so you don’t forget, Red: you’ve now chosen to ride shotgun with Twat, the man who literally failed a Google search. That’s your intellectual partner. Which tells everyone exactly how much weight to give your posts. Answer: none.” – Really not worthy of a reply TBH.

You seem to have yourself on a pedestal. You engage with TP3 in a very child-like way, yet he’s the villain and you’re just demonstrating that to everyone, almost like bullying someone because you consider yourself better than them!!

Let me know when you want to discuss the financials and 6 month cash burn / loss!! I see you’re avoiding that one 😊))

I see news of the lacklustre HYR is filtering through to the market!! Probably more to do with the cash burn for 6 months vs cash in the bank.

I could see this getting shorted off the back of an incoming fund raise.

Abnormal, you do release what a hypocrite you're making of yourself, don't you :))))

So, it's fine to say in front of an audience, press, customers and so on, at a CMD event, as long it's never mentioned again - PMSL. It's big news, as it would demonstrate some customers are interested and all done within the remits of the NDA. Company A.......sample material xxxxxxx

They could even put out some brief results to bolster the HYR!! It certainly needed it.

You're actually going against the HYR and making up reasons why they can't say it's fully commissioned. Doesn't matter what PE said, it's not like he never said anything that hasn't turned out to be true, is it?

He also made a rude off the cuff remark at a previous AGM, that if HUI wanted the tech, they'd have to pay for like everyone else. Not something the CEO should be saying in public. Queue the Whites pulling out of PHE faster than ever and cancelling the Ireland agreement; before finding a new tech to promote.

The mask is slipping matey!!

I'll tell you why it said 'once' it's fully commissioned, because it currently isn't. Therefore they can't repeat whatever PE claimed at the CMD. Simple!!

Right now, they can't even take-off the syngas to complete the hydrogen conversion to show customers the full process of a £5m price tagged 25tn FTU.

If you're building a test centre and customer demonstrator system, then it really makes sense to build the whole thing.

As many pointed out on here, if running 24/7, the system should be delivering a substantial income for PHE

Why didn't they genius? Costs, not enough space where it's assembled, couldn't get the permit / permissions, too noisy where it's running, isn't a suitable location to have it running 24/7 and so on?

Can't wait for your excuse on that or the massive losses they made in the last 6 months?

Hey Anomaly, I'm only repeating what the legally binding RNS says, which is very different to what you say PE said in a meeting. I wonder if the company stance has had to change on this for a reason?

You're welcome to twist it all you want with your claims of corporate speak "‘once fully commissioned’ — is just legal belt-and-braces. It’s corporate speak, not a secret code."

"If you can’t even parse standard disclosure wording"

Absolute nonsense, aimed at misleading and supporting your incorrect claims. You're desperate!!

What it actually says, in black and white, is:

"Potentially providing third party testing of waste streams at the Powerhouse Technology Centre once fully commissioned"

'potentially' - as in the future!!

'Once fully commissioned' - means it isn't ATM - very basic phrases even you can't mix up, oh wait.....

So I'll take the word of the company HYR report thanks, rather than some oddball's 'hard facts' on a share forum "Customer feedstocks have already gone through it." :))))

Obviously if they had already done these trials / tests, they'd have at least mentioned it (with out naming names, before you start on NDA's and 'top secret' operations at HQ), because there was nothing else exciting in there.

Do you want to discuss the 'actual' financials for the 6 months and cash burn?