Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
17.24 - here is a timeline example from the link in the recent RNS - pretty impressive!:
Issue Resolved: Tests Previously Expected to Fail to Detect the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant (As of 12/27/2021)
These tests have been modified or otherwise have addressed the issue of their inability to detect the omicron variant.
The list(s) of tests at the bottom of the doc included 'some' details of specific changes that have been made to tests to comply with FDA requirements. When combined with our own situation it casts light on the nature of modifications that Avacta might seek to make (and time scale). Interesting that they chose to provide a link to American requirements at this time.....
The RNS includes the following as I posted at 09.01. It raises many exciting prospects and goes some way (scroll down)to telling us about ''modifications'. Find at [1] VGLA:
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-viral-mutations-impact-covid-19-tests#omicronvariantimpact
There is helpful information in the RNS footnote link [1], especially lower down where specific test alterations are considered (a little). I also note, both in body text and footnote, that there are repeated references to mutations in Omicron which is, clearly, a moving target. VGLA:
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-viral-mutations-impact-covid-19-tests#omicronvariantimpact
Bit tricky to see the provenance of this link. Might have been posted/written by Embarassed_Cat_plus numbers. I'm sure I could be missing the crucial detail(s), sorry :-( VGLA
Unfortunately at 12.19 another poster felt it appropriate to weigh in with a very patronising response. Said poster has previously gone further as we are reminded from another board at 14.17: '...and the problem with you, ...... is that you thought it was appropriate to encourage a poster with whom you disagreed to go off and prepare to commit suicide. I cannot believe you think it appropriate to continue to post on lse.' Sums it all up really. To all others VGLA, as ever.
Quite a few good things to take away from the Corporate Presentation. Worth reading if you are new here. Also worth sorting out posters to consider seriously and those to skimp over. Post at 12.19 would be a good place to start - worth reading, evaluating and then looking at posting history and the obvious implications. As ever, VGLA
We have a good quotation from a post at the weekend 'Therefore I ask the following question which no-one on this forum wants to answer.' Got it in one :-) Much more interesting is an energy documentary link over on a neighbouring bb - different slant from the usual 'received wisdom' VGLA
13.55 - the 12.35 post has all the usual baggage of 'posting history'; not looking promising for any genuine insights. However, the 88e scene is evolving on some of our possible fronts even if the HRZ has moved 'out of fashion'. Looking at our portfolio as a whole, it has phenomenal potential. Could do with realising even a slice of our potential 'soon(ish...)'! VGLA