Member Info for RealityChap

I hope, Bondy, I certainly hope. But I've given up expecting...

That's none rather than nine!!

Absolutely. We need to capitalise on at least one of the opportunities that appear to have got some way down the line. Nine of them have delivered anything material yet. We can't possibly have the bandwidth to start charging off on over ambitious wild goose chases

The basis of this thread is that there is a sector that needs a lot of power, therefore we should be involved. Top analysis.

Thanks for making me actually laugh out loud - always a challenge in the first week in January! We can barely sell any that might power some equipment on a building site - how many do you think would be needed to provide reliable back up power for a hospital??!! Much though I hope your optimism is justified that's absolutely hilarious!

As usual, Escala, the person lying is Stockcheque.

He's picked a quote from Bond which is nearly a year old and suggested that the quote of the cracker being worth significantly more than the then market cap (roughly double what it is now) means that the cracker is worth about 60% more than that historic overall value.

Baseless.

If there is no decent commercial news by then we are probably knackered

Conditions have been created that have made potentially fertile ground for shorters and I am 100% sure that nobody on here is doing their bidding. Frankly, it's infantile to dismiss concerns as being agenda driven - the only agenda shareholders have is to want to see the price significantly higher having been spectacularly let down in recent years.

But I've no interest in a presentation full of meaningless platitudes. I hope that some real news can be put forward very soon - there are enough irons in fires to have some hope that one of them is glowing red hot

Exactly Bondy. Stockcheque became a ludicrous parody a good long while ago and has gone much further up that path since the share price collapsed. It's all very well being positive but continuing to propogate myths in the face of massive evidence to the contrary is just plain weird.

There's no doubt that AIM, and much or the wider market, is failing to value assets 'fairly' although, of course, fairness is seen from multiple angles.

Part of the problem is that companies at this scale are of minimal (i.e. no) interest to the vast majority of institutional investors as is evidenced by the list of disclosable shareholders being dominated by PI nominees. This was a problem when the market cap was in the several hundred million bracket but a much bigger one now that it's sub £100m. It just doesn't register at all.

As has been the case for some considerable time the only thing that will get this moving and revalued upwards is material sales. Whether that's of fuel cells or crackers I, like every other shareholder I imagine, couldn't care less but if it doesn't happen then there is no way that any fantastical valuation will be realised.

For the utterly disingenuous StockCheque to be quoting Bond from nearly a year ago as some sort of hard evidence of a real valuation is clearly ridiculous.

RNSs really have been masterclasses in vaguery! No real clue re the Acciona trial duration in the announcement, although I think you are right from the November trading update (I thought I'd read this year but can't find where). An order from Niftylift but no clue how many, Agreement to scale production with Zollner but no numbers at all - the list goes on. I am going to look at AIM regs and see if the NOMAD really should be promulgating better comms than has been the case.

Form the RNS of 18 June:

· Now undergoing in-house operational testing in preparation for the Attestation of Conformity and CE marking certification process later this year.

it's so typically vague that who knows? Can read that in multiple ways - my first interpretation was that the process would be completed in 2024, but it doesn't actually say that. Nor does it actually say anything else!

And here he is, the biggest troll on here - who is yet to be right about......anything!! Still holding out for £3 presumably; not to worry - the market cap of this will never drop below £500m!

The last IM update really bothered me, Bondy.

It focused almost exclusively on the cracker but we are yet to hear of any specific interest/commercial prospects/partnerships etc. Meanwhile the fuel cell activity appears (stress appears before the usual mob pile in,. which they will anyway!) to have stalled with no news on the CE marking, no news from the Acciona trial, no news of any Tamgo clients placing orders and no news of recurring income or additional orders via Speedy. With that background I can see why it looked like they were throwing their lot in with Hyamtec but here we are.

Mike Rendall is a scientist; I'm not setting great store by his commercial views. The time when this becomes worth £3 00m is when someone takes it off our hands or we have enough sales to justify such a number

The people who said the cracker was massively valuable were Bond and Dixon-Clarke. I very much hope t's right but, just like the fuels cells, it needs some indication of adoption and commercial viability. Fingers crossed

The point of the board is to debate. Unfortunately there are a small number of people who just shout down others and insist theirs is the only opinion that matters, even when it is consistently and demonstrably nonsense

I don't understand why anyone with an alternative view to 'everything is rosy' which clearly it isn't - have you seen the share price?! - are derided as 'keyboard warriors'.

There are three (probably) people on here who are consistently aggressive (StockCheque/Haggis, Mr News and Jgbb - the daft Jock) and it seems to be them who constantly throw that accusation around (along with the ludicrous assertion that everyone t hey don't like works for Helikon) while refusing to engage in any form of debate that doesn't agree 100% with their view.

it's very strange behaviour from people who, logically, must be as peed off as everybody else that AFC have, thus, far, singularly failed to deliver.

A very strange reaction. Deeply sexist too. Odd.