Updates etc18 Jul 2020 17:40
Interesting to hear the rather conspicuous complaints from certain quarters about ‘lack of news’, so I looked over the RNSs, and it doesn’t take much effort to find news –the latest two are well worth rereading, if you have perhaps been conditioned to read them too superficially, or too used to what is actually significant scientific advancement. But the pace of this does seem to be increasing lately.
The RNS of 24th June announces the resolution of problems which now allow the drug to go to manufacture for clinical supplies in Q3 of this year (that’s now). This means the final hurdle has been removed from the way of manufacturing ‘a completely new class of potent and selective immunotherapy agents’ which has provided astounding results in preclinical trials.
Look at the other news from that RNS – a peer review of Modi-1 in the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, so not a speculative write up, but reviewed by others who are happy to put their names to the review. The title says ‘induces potent CD4-mediated anti-tumor responses’. Not ‘may’ or ‘could’– DOES. The RNS also reminds us of the scope of Moditope –a clinical trial in patients with solid tumours including triple negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, renal cancer and head and neck cancer. And these are hard to treat cancers don’t forget.
Then the RNS from 12th June– Guess what?Another peer reviewed document, concerning the function of Avidimab. In crude terms a bolt-on turbocharger to an antibody's potential therapeutic properties. Peer reviewed, not speculation, and in a journal of the AACR, so top level territory.
Further back in the RNSs was the announcement of the Covidity platform on 24th April – I appreciate this was not quite a whole 3 months ago which is a long time for those goldfish for whom a fortnight’s trading is a lifetime, but it was a very quick response to an urgent global problem. Of course it isn’t an optimistic shot in the dark, it is as the RNS explains built on the proven safety and ‘well beyond the established norms’ results of SCIB1, with the aim of producing a simple, safe, cost-effective and scalable vaccine. A realistic aspiration on the overall scale of things? I would say so.
So a new platform based on proven safe science three months ago, five weeks ago a peer reviewed publication of another platform (which has first of three interested parties nearing the end of a one year evaluation period), and a peer reviewed article about the massive potential of MODI-1 just over three weeks ago.
It is plainly wrong and disingenious that those who claim not to be updated have been so vociferous while what is actually significant and validated fact has been produced by the company in (literally) recent weeks. It has been said before when these sort of campaigns get waged on the BB, but those who expect a weekly newsletter to help their trading really need to pull their socks up. Or sock anyway.