Member Info for ratcliffewriter

There’s always the filter option.

Inanaco you say Knowlesi is a shareholder - is that really likely given that he has no faith in the BoD, the science, the appetite for larger investors to become involved....? It would be very hypocritical if he were, so given his integrity I suspect he sold out a long time ago.

Ruck - what is really cheap is how certain folk have been disproportionately critical of the company, its management and progress, but now all of a sudden take the view of 'now everything looks fine'. If their (literally) years of derision and undermining had been anywhere near accurate the company would have folded years ago. The saddest part is they all now want to say 'but let's look to the future' when literally months or even weeks ago they were slating everything in sight - Lindy being a part timer, the board running a lifestyle company, unable to attract investment, and anyone who held long term and confident in their research being a mad ramper and a fool. Yet these dedicated 'ass toot' posters never concede for one second that they might have been wrong, nor have the common decency to apologise for being so persistently derogatory and abusive when it now suits them to do an abrupt about turn as the company eventually starts to do what the more stalwart supporters always believed it would.

Indeed GF, a couple of worms turning lately. It makes one think of Saint Paul's experience en route to Damascus. Miraculous!

And me.

Well really Knowlesi, I saw your post earlier where you said 'Pretty disgusted to see many of my previous posts cut and pasted with no context' so just tried to rectify your obvious disquiet and represent you in a fairer light. Some people are so ungrateful!

I quoted ‘...most likely scenario is failure.’
Full post -
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 7.65
No Opinion
RE: Morning all20 Aug 2020 15:32
Wild - re scancell failing entirely. Absolute hope not but trinity delta's probabilities of commercial success suggest most likely scenario is failure. Does that concern you at all?

I quoted ‘Never has the "lifestyle company" description been so apt....’
Full quote -
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 5.95
No Opinion
RE: Sky news - The Scancell report (I think)12 Jun 2020 23:44
Calls for shareholders to write to MP's here (make sure you disclose your financial interests) & kickstarter being thrown around as an idea. Never has the "lifestyle company" description been so apt....

Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 5.05
I quoted ‘rubbish science or rubbish executive team. I lean towards the latter.’
Full post -
No Opinion
RE: Roche.Roche12 Nov 2019 19:13
Crumbs : 2 possible answers, rubbish science or rubbish executive team. I lean towards the latter. .

I quoted ‘No chance they can raise 15m.’
Full post:

Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 5.85
No Opinion
RE: GAVI conference on Thursday 4th June03 Jun 2020 11:13
No chance they can raise 15m. Institutional base isnt big enough. No idea where funding is coming from - it doesnt look great. An update will be well received

I didn’t originally quote this one, but everyone enjoys a laugh on a weekend –

Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,457
Price: 5.15
No Opinion
RE: Inan - BioNTech07 Apr 2020 12:28
But Scancell have nothing to do with Covid, influenza or infectious diseases - why would an early stage oncology company be impacted by money flowing into Covid ? Clutching at straws springs to mind....

I reckon £2,700,000 says different...

A good day today – however I was thinking on the post I did last night where I highlighted the persistently negative way Knowlesi has posted for so long. He correctly pointed out that I had not quoted whole posts and was concerned the sentiment of his posts would not be seen if they were quoted in part. This played on my mind so I extracted the full posts in relation to some of those I highlighted so they can be seen properly. This allows a better appreciation of what was said. I haven’t repeated every post as there were rather a lot, but hope this provides a representative sample.
I quoted – ‘Are we going to new lows, I have a horrible feeling we are.’
The full post reads:
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 5.85
No Opinion
Bazooka at the ready10 Mar 2020 16:06
Are we going to new lows, I have a horrible feeling we are....bazooka well and truly holstered. News/progress needed now more than ever.
I quoted ‘Will we go lower than 3.6p...I think likely yes.’
Full post:
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 4.90
No Opinion
RE: Volume 548k29 Nov 2019 14:42
5p breached - could be prime the bazooka time coming. Will we go lower than 3.6p...I think likely yes.
I quoted ‘Lifestyle company - it's become too cosy and for the benefit of employees only.’
Full post:
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,457
Price: 6.75
No Opinion
RE: OT Bicycle Therapeutics25 Feb 2020 17:16
Lifestyle company - it's become too cosy and for the benefit of employees only. Patients and shareholders have been secondary considerations for too long.
I quoted ‘This is the start of a significant divestment process in scancell.’
Full post:
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 8.25
No Opinion
RE: RNS Director sale27 Apr 2020 18:28
Couple of options - 1) They need the cash and this is a one-off 2) This is the start of a significant divestment process in scancell - neither are great in my mind
I posted ‘how you must hate that I am always right...’
Full post -
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,456
Price: 6.95
No Opinion
RE: Up on news - gradual fade28 Jan 2020 19:30
Rats : pretty polite for you. Oh how you must hate that I am always right....
I posted ‘Scancell has no expertise in viruses, infectious diseases etc.’
Full post -
Knowlesi
Posted in: SCLP
Posts: 2,457
Price: 5.25
No Opinion
RE: Afternoon08 Apr 2020 09:18
Ray - I would suggest we stick to what we now - 1) All the Collabs are "for the treatment of cancer 2) Scancell has no expertise in viruses, infectious diseases etc. You have made a huge assumption of scope creep of the research collaborations. I wouldn't be getting my hopes up if I were you or anyone watching re Covid-19 related deals - it's not at all what SCLP does.

An appropriate analogy too - the Happy Mondays are heavily into cutting edge pharmaceutical stuff too...

It's probably a big SmirK.

Looks like Knowlesi's 3.5p was a misprint after all.

Over 2 million traded in the first two hours and blue too.

So virtually a million traded in the first 30 minutes. Entertaining!

I suppose it depends on one's definition of gloating, but a quick look back at posts by Knowlesi that weren't removed (so these are presumably the better ones). I won't be responding to any comments on this post as there have been a load of very informative and extremely interesting posts lately, so I don't want to cause too much distraction from them, I'll just leave it here for contemplation of what SK would like to say is 'balanced' posting. It's a good way of seeing the true direction of a poster however. They are chronological, so newest last, each line from a different post. I didn't include any entries that said 'buy buy buy' but there were a good few. Anyway, here are the non-gloaty balanced entries of a long term follower of the share.

rubbish science or rubbish executive team. I lean towards the latter.
Will we go lower than 3.6p...I think likely yes.
how you must hate that I am always right...
I used the term "lifestyle" business a while ago and stand by that now.
What he (Diggle) sees, I personally don't know.
Lifestyle company - it's become too cosy and for the benefit of employees only.
Are we going to new lows, I have a horrible feeling we are.
Now you think immuno-oncology is going to have more interest because of Covid.....Doesn't make sense at all. We aren't in that space whatsoever.
Scancell has no expertise in viruses, infectious diseases etc.
Make no mistake it will be harder to get our hands on funding than it was previously (This was while the BoD were in late stage talks with Redmile)
This is the start of a significant divestment process in scancell.
No chance they can raise 15m.
The lack of funding suggests the science isn't all that robust....
Lifestyle company.....
Never has the "lifestyle company" description been so apt....
...most likely scenario is failure.
... hence more probability of failure.
And finally he adds -
Makes you wonder what some people's intentions are, mine is to make a few quid.

It’s just another cider me.

Let’s hope all can buy Ansell at we think fit without becoming bitter, and not be left with just a little whine.

Bet you don't get it for 3p a pint however much you stamp your foot...

Check my posts crackin - I never called anything. Ever. Either way. I just have long term confidence.

Which part of crackin's posting is right? The sneering contempt? The chameleon-like flip flopping? The returning under different identities after being banned? Or maybe the continual references to the other slugs on t'other board? There's a big difference between varying opinions and professional malice.

Double figure vision...