Member Info for ralph2010

We won't need the money until FID is a green light, they will raise at a much higher SP I should think.

Rolf - I don't read or comment on any "newspapers", but I would think The Guardian would suit you. I also don't think the Earth is flat; I've never mentioned it. I believe there is some climate change; how much humans are contributing and what the effects will be are debatable, but I don't think Greta Goblins "emergency" is accurate . Now she loves Hamas and has forgotten all about it, gets another boat cruise though and some sweets off the Israelis. We were all supposed to be fried by UV light already; they were even making dreadful films like Highlander 2 to push the agenda at the time, so forgive my skepticism, but we have been here before.

Interesting ! I wonder if when 1st Oil drops a lot of them bail and buy RKH to get another 2-3 year ride up ?

Oh, I'm on the list, that's quite an accolade!

Fred - Video was interesting.

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change

The study used a keyword-based algorithm trained on a random sample of 3,000 papers

The debate is not closed with all the 99% stuff.

Mike Hulme (2009) – Why We Disagree About Climate Change

Argues that interpretations of climate change are deeply shaped by culture, politics, and worldviews, not just empirical science.

Read here

Dale Jamieson (2014) – Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed

Discusses failures in political and ethical responses to climate science and doubts precise forecasting of consequences.

Read here

TGK Bryce & SP Day (2014) – Scepticism and Doubt in Science Education

Analyzes how complexity in global warming makes space for skepticism, even in scientific and educational contexts.

Read here

John Urry (2015) – Climate Change and Society

Critiques how climate models may oversimplify impacts by relying on uncertain assumptions, warning against overconfident predictions.

Read here

JA de Graaf et al. (2023) – The Climate Change Skepticism Questionnaire

Validates a tool to measure public doubts, showing ongoing uncertainty about climate change's real-world pace and severity.

Methodology: Surveyed 3,146 earth scientists, with 79 respondents from a subset of actively publishing climate researchers. Two questions were asked:

Has the climate warmed since pre-1800 levels?

Do human activities significantly contribute to global warming?

Findings:

90% of all respondents agreed temperatures have risen.

82% agreed humans significantly influence global temperature.

Among the 79 actively publishing climate scientists, 97.4% (77/79) agreed that human activities are a significant contributor to global warming.

" over 99% of qualified scientists state man made climate change as fact. " This is not true, the MSM keep banging this one out, it was a survey they sent out, not the data and arguments examined properly. The fact remains that their models do not work. When they use old data where the CO2 levels and temperatures are known, they are wrong. I'm not saying there isn't climate change and that man has nothing to do with it, but it's not fully understood, and the consequences can't be gauged since the models don't work.

Also, the guy who runs and gets all the temp data from satellites in space says they aren't a normal temp sensor, they are in 2.7 Kelvin (-455 degrees Fahrenheit) for a start ! There aren't a little glass thing with mercury, they are electromagnetic, and their accuracy can change day to day. So you can argue the source data that the climate scientists are receiving in the 1st place.

I use AI daily. Won't be able to take my job just yet, but it's possible in the future, I would guess.

There's no point talking to someone who is still completely in the matrix, such as yourself.

Just know that you are a quisling. Good day sir.

Yes Rolf. Because some of us understand the damaging effects, we had to let people go recently, and that wasn't easy. They had fake Master's degrees in robotics and A.I. They didn't even know how to install SQL Studio, let alone write a query. Laughably, they said they installed it and nothing happened; they downloaded the installer.exe in Windows, but didn't go to the download folder and run it! They had only installed something on a phone in their lives!

Lets just say these people were from below the equator, hope I don't get ill soon, since the treasonous politicians are still stuffing our health service with these fake and useless freeloaders.

And here you are Garbled ! The man of 1000 faces.

Is back with the new name of "Divi-Collector" LOL

Flare up again. If Iran has had its ambition crushed for now, it will start again after some peace.

It's feasible that Iran has moved its enriched Uranium, it's not like they weren't given notice, with the USA giving Israel bombs and moving B2s around with everyone knowing they are the only planes to carry the biggest bomb. If I were Iranian, I would have moved to several locations a long time ago. It's easy to move around when it's not in an actual reactor. Who would really know how deep some of their locations go ? Could have built a 1000ft tunnel.

The issue could easily

I disagree; if Iran had teeth, they would be parading downed F-35s and pilots etc. That absence hints that they have no control over their skies, therefore, not enough damage is being caused. Iran has also only fired rockets and doesn't seem to have an air force, so another hint that they are toothless. It's how I perceive, and you won't change my mind.

Seems pretty evident, I would say.

I lived in an Islamic country. They bought and sold 9-year-old girls, and are indeed brutal. Death doesn't mean the same thing out there like in Europe. Life is cheap.

Iran isn't causing enough damage to Israel to carry on, they need an off ramp. They key is have their nuke ambitions been stopped ?

Only 5% of the Oil that goes through Homruz is for the USA. China will be affected much more, 40% of theirs goes through it. Im not sure what purpose or advantage it would give them.

Yeh, these people are more sinister than first look. The guy is clearly full of BS, they post on retrospective trades they say they have done, they have no value whatsoever.

I said ,what about breakfast at Sharkeys?