RE: The whole Picture8 Mar 2022 15:06
No - your point was to paint half a picture that aligned with your agenda. We are aware that Lithium has a significant head start - and is being specified for the bulk of installations - however Lithium is getting more expensive as the demand goes up, is losing its price advantage, has not been demonstrated to have long service life, and has a fire risk associated with it. So who can tell what the future brings. With regards to Bushveld the focus appears to be electrolyte supply for Africa (which is a long way from California), and support for the still fledgling VRFB industry, as well as our primary market of Nitrovan supply. So I'm not sure why you needed to point out a new Lithium installation in California - please clarify.