Member Info for RachT2

SilverFoxd

As we both know, of course there are ongoing costs — at GS and across the wider 80M portfolio — so naturally there is cash burn. Bizarre that ilDuce would claim that's merely speculation on your part - perhaps they think maintenance, corporate governance, staff, insurance, licences, travel etc etc etc all come free. LOL.

The suggestion that cash burn is merely speculation on your part is ludicrous in the extreme.

What is interesting is how similar conversations have played out before.

Back in mid/late 2025 I suggested that a fundraise was looking increasingly likely because GS was not generating the cashflow that some on the board had repeatedly claimed it would.

The response from ilDuce? Apparently I was just being “negative”, “morally bankrupt” etc etc.

Then came the confident assurances from ilDuce, obviously the master of balancing the books on a corporate level:

11th September 2025: “No need for placing”.

15th September 2025: “They are ‘cashed up’ enough not to need a placement. Simple as that!”

Fast forward roughly 10 weeks and, as we now know, a fundraise was announced. Fancy that.

Make of that what you will. 😉

Oh, and apparently they know that a particular seller has now run out of stock. Hilarious.

As with all my posts — past, present and future — this is IMHO only. Opinion, not advice. Please DYOR before making any investment decisions.

Continued....

3. 80M did similar

If you want proof of how common this is on AIM, you only have to look at 80 Mile plc's own YE accounts. Some ‘’profit’’ recorded for 80M was the result of Kobold walking away. The “profit” recorded is almost entirely down to 80M getting back the 49% of Disko (plus £750k kit) when Kobold walked away. In reality, they’ve treated the “free” return of their own former 49% as if it were a fresh acquisition – and booked an accounting gain because the “purchase price” was nil. The company even described it as a “Bargain purchase of Nikkeli A/S”. The truth? Kobold just handed it back because they weren’t interested.

So basically 80M got back something (they've previously given to Kobold) for free but then placed a value on it and recorded that value as being a profit.

Smoke and mirrors.

Based on previous ramptastic posts; the number of people on this board that have even the most basic understanding of YE accounts would appear to be extremely small / negligible. Yet that doesn't stop the RC loudly shouting ‘’PROFIT’’. Hilarious.

As with all my posts — past, present and future — this is IMHO only. Opinion, not advice. Please DYOR before making any investment decisions.

SilverFoxd

You are quite correct to be concerned. It was a paper profit. I posted the same when it first appeared in the YE accounts and some of the RC were shouting ‘’PROFIT’’ - they were naive enough to think that HV had actually made a production profit. LOL. Or they were just ramping their usual narrative, regardless of the facts. Quelle surprise.

So, where did this nearly £1.9 million "profit" magically come from?

Welcome to the world of AIM accounting mirrors. This wasn't cash from ‘’operating’’ or revenue from selling biofuels; it was an accounting gain on paper driven by a corporate revaluation of assets. I'm not sure you can call the RNS misleading as it merely reflects complex accounting practices. Here is how the “trick” works:

1. The Balance Sheet Revaluation Trick

Under UK and International Accounting Standards, when a parent company shifts its stakes or restructures an acquired company, it is legally required to revalue the subsidiary's assets to "Fair Value."

When Pat Tremamunno’s group and 80M initially packaged the Greenswitch refinery under the UK holding shell (Hydrogen Valley Ltd), they took a bankrupt, stagnant piece of Italian real estate and layered a THEORETICAL corporate valuation on top of it.

By adding the implied future value of the facility, the land, and the technical equipment, the "book value" of Hydrogen Valley’s investments shot up ON PAPER compared to what they initially paid to pull it out of bankruptcy. There's your so-called ‘’profit’’.

2. Paper Gains vs. Real Cash

In corporate finance, if an asset you bought for peanuts is suddenly valued by auditors at £2 million based on its future industrial potential, that massive bump in valuation is recorded on the income statement as a "Gain."

Crucially, this gain flows straight down (through the accounts) to the bottom line, showing up as a "Profit After Tax."

The Catch: There is an absolute world of difference between an Operating Profit (money made from selling a product) and a Paper Profit (an accounting adjustment). HV had the latter, but absolutely NONE of the former. So no cash gain to be found sitting in the bank account.

Continued.......

Continued...

​The Tecnoparco Indicator: Local utility giant Tecnoparco Valbasento has an agreement to buy 40,000 tonnes of biofuel from Greenswitch to run its own power generation units. Tecnoparco continues to source its fuel elsewhere, confirming that Greenswitch hasn't delivered a single drop of commercial product.

​

The Bottom Line

​

The gap between what is being fed to London investors and what is happening on the ground in Italy is as wide as ever. While the company's May 28th notice subtly downgraded the narrative to the plant merely "undergoing final maintenance," the complete lack of an operational workforce, zero raw material deliveries, and total local press blackout tell the real story.

​The end of H1 deadline will pass on June 30th without commercial fuel production. The plant remains a quiet, non-operational asset for now.

As stated - this is an AI produced report.

Does anyone have any further info at this stage that might suggest the plant will hit its 5th re-started date? Hopefully we don't hear from Damers - all of their claims about GS have repeatedly been proven to be nothing more than a stream of false and inaccurate fantasy.

As ever, all (other than the AI section) IMHO, of course.

Tick tock, tick tock.

Only 12 working days remain until the latest Greenswitch restart target passes into history — joining the previous assurances that failed to materialise.

Will this prove to be another over-optimistic projection that investors were encouraged to believe? I suspect it will, but as always, that is just my opinion.

At this stage I can’t prove it — so I looked to AI for assistance. It looked for the obvious signs you would expect to see if a 50,000 tonne-per-year biodiesel/SAF facility was genuinely moving into production: recruitment, logistics, feedstock movements and evidence of physical operations.

The response was rather interesting -

Let’s strip away the UK regulatory filters and look at the hard, physical facts on the ground in Basilicata, Italy. If a massive biorefinery designed to pump out 50,000 tonnes of biodiesel and Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) annually is coming online, it leaves a massive physical and bureaucratic footprint.

​

Right now, that footprint is completely invisible. Here is the reality check against the three things you’d expect to see:

​

1. Local Job Vacancies: Total Radio Silence

​

You cannot run a highly volatile, technologically complex chemical refinery with a skeleton crew. It requires a full roster of chemical engineers, plant operators, shift supervisors, safety officers, and on-site laboratory technicians.

​The Reality: A thorough sweep of local Basilicata job boards, Italian recruitment portals, and the regional employment registries (Centri per l'Impiego) reveals not a single job opening listed under Greenswitch S.r.l. or Hydrogen Valley. No one is hiring, because no one is operating.

​

2. Feedstock Deliveries: The Supply Chain is Dormant

​

The company’s entire commercial narrative relies on importing massive amounts of raw feedstock—specifically Palm Oil Methyl Ester (POME) and Used Cooking Oil (RUCO).

​

The Logistics Catch: According to 80 Mile's own investor presentations, these heavy raw materials must be shipped internationally, dropped off at the Port of Taranto, and then trucked 70 kilometers inland directly to the Ferrandina site.

​

The Reality: There are absolutely no regional transport manifests, no customs clearance notices at Taranto matching this profile, and zero local sightings of heavy tanker fleets moving raw chemical oils along the Basento valley infrastructure.

​

3. Signs of Physical Operation: None

​

A chemical plant restart cannot be hidden in a small, tight-knit industrial park.

​

The Environmental Red Tape: As we know, the site is under active surveillance by ARPAB (the regional environmental protection agency) due to legacy contamination from the old Mythen SpA days. A live operational restart requires public regulatory filings, updated industrial emissions permits, and active discharge monitoring. No such start-up clearances have been published by the region.

Continued........

​

Buzz

“Baby reindeer”, “destroy her”, “suppress her dopamine”?

Wow. I know your usual standard of posting can be poor, but that really is a new level.

If the entire RC chooses to filter me or stop replying, that would honestly suit me fine. It would mean fewer distractions and fewer posts that require a response when they contain more inaccurate claims, wild predictions or the usual unsupported assertions.

Of course, I’m under no illusion that everyone — or anyone — in the RC is remotely interested in my posts. They clearly believe they know best and are confident enough in their own views to dismiss anything that challenges the narrative.

The alternative possibility, of course, is that some are simply promoting a particular storyline with the intention of flipping and disappearing - as is evident on many of the other boards that certain members of the RC have posted on. Fancy that.

Either way, the outcome is the same — any contrary opinion, regardless of whether it is supported by facts or not, is treated as something to attack rather than consider. That's the beauty of a balanced debate. LOL.

After all, we’ve seen the certainty before: 50x by the end of the month… then 100x… then 80x… 5p by Friday… and so on. And such claims have always proven to have been reliable. ROFL.

So if the filtering starts, I’ll consider it a positive. Less noise, less nonsense, and fewer opportunities to point out when assertive claims don’t match reality.

Everyone’s a winner. 😂

All IMHO, of course.

SilverFoxd

Looks like you’ve made another good call.

Several large trades today, with the majority showing as sells on Sharescope.

As always, unless you are one of the parties involved, none of us can know with absolute certainty whether a particular trade is a buy or a sell, and the online software is nothing more than an algorithmic guess.

All IMHO, of course.

Joeking

PM'd

Hilarious.

So if you’re presented with two types of posters:

Someone repeatedly posting inaccurate, unsubstantiated claims across multiple boards.

Someone repeatedly pointing out those inaccuracies and highlighting the associated risks.

Which one do you choose to filter?

Apparently the answer is obvious — filter the one you disagree with because you can’t construct a credible counter argument to the points being raised.

Instead we get the usual response: deflection, ridicule and accusations of deceit — but strangely very few facts, evidence or genuine rebuttals.

Nothing says “confident in your investment case” quite like trying to remove anyone who challenges it. 😂

Why not create the perfect echo chamber instead? A place where everyone can congratulate each other, pat themselves on the back and reassure each other that every decision was brilliant. 👏

No inconvenient questions. No opposing views. No balance.

Where’s the irony?

Pure comedy.

All IMHO, of course.

VikR

What a curious complaint.

“Wish I could wake up just one day without seeing a post from yourself.”

If that was genuinely the objective, the solution is remarkably simple — the filter button is there for exactly that purpose. Why not use it?

The fact that you continue to read, respond and engage with my posts is entirely your own choice, despite the rather dramatised claims that you’d rather not see them.

As ever, the contradiction is rather amusing.

Still expecting 100% of GS off-take to go to a single party? Still convinced the EBT share transfer was “smart money” loading up? Still placing faith in Justin? And so on…..ROFL.

And how are those other “tips” going — UFO, JAN, ECR, etc? Still averaging down? The charts don’t exactly look inspiring, although I’m happy to accept I may have missed something given my limited charting skills. 😂 Your posts on those boards are also most enlightening. LOL.

Please do continue with the entertainment; the comedy is always welcome.

All IMHO, of course.

Jacksdad

Relax — I merely expressed an opinion. Weird how you interpret that as ‘belittling’ someone. I know expressing an opinion can sometimes be a difficult concept on a bulletin board where only one narrative is welcomed, but calm down, you're reading too much into it.

Others are perfectly entitled to tell VikR to “go all in” or “nice one, VikR’’ if that’s their view. That’s the whole point of discussion — different opinions, different risk assessments.

I’m sure VikR is more than capable of deciding which arguments they find more credible without needing you to play gatekeeper.

Chill. A little balance never hurt anyone.

Having said that, I think you’ll find the various opinions I’ve expressed along the way have aged pretty well so far. Certainly better than the ‘BOOMS’, ‘50X’, ‘100X’, ‘5p by the end of the week’ nonsense. Don’t you agree? LOL.

All IMHO, of course.

VikR

’Excellent level to buy from for those with spare funds. 50% retracement and a strong support line with upcoming news catalysts’’ - Agree.

“Might also downsize on a few other shares to increase holdings here” - Disagree. Still way too many unknowns and it all hinges on binary outcomes. Being greedy can cost you, or even ruin you.

All IMHO, of course.

Continued...

​3. The 10 Million Euro Grant Fiasco

​While bulletin boards talk about the €10 million green hydrogen PNRR grant as a massive victory, Italian regulatory records reveal a quiet corporate disaster: Greenswitch ultimately lost or walked away from that €10 million grant.

​

In mid-2024, the Basilicata region officially communicated the decadence/forfeiture of the contribution for the project.

​Winning a public grant in Italy is easy; executing it within strict European PNRR deadlines while undergoing complex corporate restructuring is incredibly difficult. When the grant fell through, the plant instantly lost its state-sponsored funding runway, meaning it required millions in private capital injection just to achieve a basic restart.

​4. Capital Escalation (The Need for a PLC)

​To scale the plant up to a capacity of 50,000 tonnes of biodiesel and Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), a private individual cannot easily bankroll the required upgrades out of pocket.

​

The transaction saw a massive capital restructuring where Greenswitch's internal share capital was shrunk down from €2 million to €100,000 to prepare it to slide underneath the UK shell, Hydrogen Valley Ltd.

​

By selling the asset to an AIM-listed company (80M), Tremamunno successfully offloaded the immense capital expenditure burden of the physical restart to 80 Mile’s public retail markets and institutional placements.

​

5. Tremamunno didn't just give the plant away.

Through his offshore vehicle, Greendome Holdings Inc., he extracted:

​An initial cash sweetener of €100,000.

​A massive equity stake of 220 million shares in 80M (which he is legally free to start dealing or hedging this month as the lock-in expires).

​A legal right to a massive chain of deferred milestone cash and share bonuses stretching into 2027 and 2028 (including a €750,000 cash wire next year because the share price failed to triple).

​

Summary

​

Pat Tremamunno sold because he achieved his goal: he saved a local asset from immediate liquidation, secured its initial corporate survival, and then flipped it to an AIM shell to let public market equity fund the grueling, heavily-regulated physical restart. He chose guaranteed, low-risk corporate paper and structured cash payouts over the high-risk operational headaches of running an Italian bio-chemical plant in his golden years.

As with all my posts — past, present and future — this is IMHO only. Opinion, not advice. Please DYOR before making any investment decisions.

Following Ashton’s suggestions to research Pat Tremamunno that is exactly what I did. AI came to the rescue. The results do indicate that Pat is a very shrewd businessman and paints an alternative picture of the HV / Greenswitch deal. Ashton may regret urging others to research Pat?

The investigative pieces published in Italy (particularly by regional outlets like Basilicata24 and La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno) clarify why Pat Tremamunno decided to sell the Greenswitch plant to 80 Mile plc via the Hydrogen Valley structure.

​While bulletin boards paint the asset as a straightforward money-printing machine, the local reality reveals that Tremamunno’s exit was driven by a mix of personal timing, severe local industrial headaches, and a calculated decision to cash out.

​

1. The "Age Factor" and Exit Plan

​Pat Tremamunno is in his late 70s. He emigrated from Ferrandina to Canada in the 1960s and built a successful career there (owning Inox Industries). Local Italian journalists noted that when he bought the bankrupt plant back in 2017, it was widely seen as a rescue mission driven by "amore di patria" (love for his hometown) rather than a long-term operational play.

​

He openly stated to the Italian press that his intention was always to step in, clean up the initial bankruptcy structure, get it back on its feet, and sell it to a larger international group within a few years. He simply hit his personal target window to exit.

​

2. The Environmental "Mythen" Hangover

​

The facility is a former chemical plant (originally owned by Mythen Spa), and it carries a massive historical legacy. Italian environmental authorities (ARPAB) and the regional government have kept the site under intense scrutiny for years.

​Legal decrees explicitly state that the underlying complex remains formally classified as a contaminated site.

​

The operator is legally bound to continuous, costly environmental monitoring and mitigation to minimize underground risks. Managing a heavily regulated, legacy Italian chemical site from an office in Brampton, Ontario, creates massive administrative friction that an independent private owner rarely wants to deal with indefinitely.

​Continued.....

SilverFoxd

Re Ashton - he posted:

“he is an incredibly successful, ultra-wealthy businessman. He will therefore know exactly if and when to manage his 220 million shareholding, particularly as 80M enters an exciting phase with world-class assets like Disko and Jameson Land.”

The usual implication — that because Pat is successful and wealthy, he must therefore still be holding. Righto. Reality time.

Convenient narrative. But it ignores the most obvious (IMHO) alternative.

A genuinely successful businessman doesn’t make money by sitting passively and hoping. They manage positions, maximise value and reduce risk.

As already discussed, Pat has no reason to simply wait. A forward sale or similar arrangement could allow him to crystallise value now, whilst potentially increasing the likelihood of receiving additional shares if the required price trigger is not reached. Win. Win.

That would actually be exactly the sort of commercially astute behaviour you would expect from an “incredibly successful, ultra-wealthy” businessman.

Yet somehow Ashton’s preferred interpretation is always the ramping option. Fancy that.

No evidence that he’s holding? No problem — just assume it because it supports the narrative.

No consideration that he may have acted commercially? Ignore that because it doesn’t fit the ramp.

Nobody knows what Pat has done, but pretending there is only one possible explanation because they are ‘’incredibly successful’’ is just more of the same ramptastic nonsense.

Re Damers. I can’t see Damer’s posts as I filtered their claptrap some time ago — they didn’t have a great grasp of the facts then, and judging by the comments being discussed, it doesn’t seem much has changed.

First we had a stream of confident claims and assertions around GS that turned out to be, shall we say, somewhat detached from reality. Now it appears the same lack of understanding has simply moved on to JL.

Credit to you for continuing to bring facts and balance to the discussion. Unfortunately, as history shows, your accurate and well-researched posts will no doubt receive far less recs than those containing incorrect ramptastic speculation. Funny old place this board. 😉

As with all my posts — past, present and future — this is IMHO only. Opinion, not advice. Please DYOR before making any investment decisions.

Jacksdad

Thanks for your reply. You're welcome! LOL.

But you’ve either got a very selective memory, you’re viewing things through a rather convenient lens, or perhaps you simply weren’t around for some of the more enthusiastic periods on this board.

When the RC gets into full flow, it really is something to behold.

Take 26th January this year — 127 posts in one day. My contribution? Three posts.

So apparently I “dominate” the board do I? ROFL.

The more interesting question is: how many of those 124 posts were making confident predictions and assurances that have actually been delivered?

I’ll leave that one for you to make a guess at. 🤔

What is also rather amusing is the sudden disappearance of the usual cheerleading squad. Where are all the daily “loading”, “couldn’t resist”, “massive news coming”, “re-rate incoming” posts now?

Strange, isn’t it?

Of course, it's obvious how this works. The moment there is even a hint of positive news, the RC will reappear in force, filling the board with the same confident claims and promotional enthusiasm. Will I be dominating the board then? LOL. 🤔

Same cycle. Same narrative. Same old claptrap.

As with all my posts — past, present and future — this is IMHO only. Opinion, not advice. Please DYOR before making any investment decisions.

Arok

“The more relevant question is whether the underlying investment case has materially changed. In my view, it hasn't.” Agree. I've not changed my opinion either.

“A falling share price doesn't automatically validate every bearish argument, just as a rising share price doesn't validate every bullish one.” 100% agree.

“The ‘I told you so’ crowd seem obsessed with short-term price action, yet that's exactly what they criticise others for.” Disagree.

I assume that’s aimed at me? “Obsessed with short-term price action” seems an odd description of trying to protect and grow capital. Surely the objective of investing is to make money?

If it becomes apparent that a share price has run too far, too quickly and is likely to retrace, why not take advantage of that? Bank the profit, then potentially buy back cheaper and own more shares for the same capital. Win. Win.

That isn't being” obsessed” with short-term price action — it is simply another investment strategy.

The alternative appears to be sitting through a 50% retracement and then waiting to recover the lost value before actually making progress. That approach may suit some, but personally I struggle to see the advantage.

''Criticise others..’’. Eh? I didn't critise anyone for taking advantage of short term fluctuations. I do criticise the RC’s repeated unfounded and unsubstantiated claims of 50X, 100X, 5 bagger, 10p by next week bla bla bla - but why shouldn't I? As has been (more than adaquatelty) illustrated - such ramps are nothing more than utter dross. Or do you disagree?

“The story wasn't proven at 1.5p and it isn't disproven at 0.75p.” 100% agree.

The only difference between us appears to be that if I believe a predictable pullback is coming, I will try to use that to my advantage. Not only that - I will post that opinion too. Others seem happy to listen to the RC, ride the full cycle down and wait for a recovery. Each to their own.

But one thing should remain true: a balanced board requires both bullish and bearish views. Anyone highlighting risks, questioning assumptions or challenging the prevailing ramptastic narrative deserves consideration — not dismissal simply because their opinion differs from the crowd. As has been shown - such an opinion can often be correct.

As with all my posts — past, present and future — this is IMHO only. Opinion, not advice. Please DYOR before making any investment decisions.

The share price touched 0.746p this morning — around half the recent peak before the inevitable retracement.

So it now needs to double just to get back to where it was.

I wonder if CB is still holding? Like many others, they dismissed the warnings as “negativity” and assured everyone the upside was obvious. If the claimed 20m shares remain untouched, that’s a paper loss of around £146k from the recent high.

So who was actually talking nonsense? Answers on a postcard please.

The person repeatedly pointing out the red flags and warning that a hype-driven spike would likely unwind?

Or the RC — confidently telling everyone the “smart money” was loading up, that this was the big opportunity, and that anyone questioning the narrative simply didn’t understand it?

Funny how the market has a habit of exposing overconfidence.

The most entertaining part is the complete predictability of it all.

When the price is rising: “Couldn’t resist.” “Just topped up.” “Loading phase.” “50 bagger.” 🚀🚀🚀

When the price falls: Near silence.

Where have all the brave buyers gone? Where are the “fill your boots” declarations? Surely a cheaper price is even more of a bargain?

Unless, of course, those posts were never really about conviction — just about encouraging others to buy into the same story and provide the opportunity to flip.

The cycle repeats: exaggerated expectations, promotional noise, a spike, reality catching up, near silence from the cheerleaders… then a fresh wave of enthusiasm when the next bit of momentum appears.

Predictable. Repeated. And, for anyone paying attention, quite profitable.

Rinse and repeat. Rinse and repeat……………….

As with all my posts — past, present and future — this is IMHO only. Opinion, not advice. Please DYOR before making any investment decisions.

Jacksdad

Rather naïve comments. and 10 recs too. LOL.

“Did someone just buy £65k” — err, I can’t see that on my screen. Can you point it out? There was a rollover reported around £61k — is that perhaps what has been mistaken for a buy?

As for:

“Somebody clearly not listening to the negative drivel posted in lengthy diatribes daily.”

Do you have any specific, valid counterpoints to those “negative” posts you refer to? I suspect not.

But regardless, the logic doesn’t really stand up. The market consists of buyers and sellers — every buy has a corresponding sell. So even if the £65k purchase existed, it would simply mean someone was willing to sell the same amount.

There have also been plenty of sells recently. By the same logic, should we assume those sellers are all people who only see negatives?

The reality is much simpler: buyers and sellers have different views on value, risk and timing. One isolated trade (or in this case, a misidentified rollover) doesn’t prove the market has suddenly dismissed every concern raised.

All IMHO of course.

The price has now re-traced back to the same level as it was in mid-January - prior to the IPO and all of the substantial ramping, subsequent good news and ‘’promotional’’ interviews given by RP. So yes, this is clearly a bit of a “I told you so” moment — but the wider point is more important.

Hopefully it makes people a little more cautious about accepting everything posted by the RC on a bulletin board. Particularly when those voices repeatedly appear across multiple boards with the same recycled pattern:

“dead certs”, “unicorns”, “massive re-rates”, “50 baggers”, “100 baggers”, “I’ve loaded up”, “fill your boots” etc, etc, etc.

If a poster has a habit of making bold unsubstantiated claims across numerous companies, constantly predicting imminent transformational rises, and repeatedly announcing their own purchases, it is worth asking what their real motivation is. And, as I illustrated recently with a post about Buzz, just how accurate have their ramps turned out to be?

A particularly obvious red flag is the self-proclaimed “long-term holder” who posts relentlessly — has to average down and then mysteriously disappears from the board the moment the share price rises.

The sensible approach is to consider both sides. Positive arguments matter, but so do risks, uncertainties and uncomfortable questions.

In this case, the warning signs were there for anyone willing to look: missed timelines, over-optimistic expectations, inter-related deal structures, deals structured around shares tripling in value, and other repeated claims that failed to materialise. Some of us highlighted those concerns — and, as usual, the response was ridicule, personal attacks and attempts to silence debate.

Healthy discussion requires more than cheerleading. Investors should listen to anyone prepared to challenge the consensus — especially when they support their views with verifiable facts rather than child-like emojis.

Anyway, that’s my tuppence worth. I apologise to those who I am ‘’teaching to suck eggs’’ - hopefully some might find it helpful. I’ll expect to see a lot of green (filtered) posts appearing anytime soon. LOL.

As always, my posts are IMHO only — opinion, not advice.

Please DYO(Diligent)R before making any investment decisions.