Member Info for Quady

Hello Shipright, not like you to join the conspiracy theorists. I have seen articles like this for decades. Name me any court cases that have resulted in convictions. As for Solgold the ideas of rampers and derampers is daft. We may get the odd trader, changing tact depending if they are in or out, but equally they could be in or out because their judgement informs them that the price is going to go one way or another. For the conspiracy theorists ( your not included Shipright)
I will give you this, consider it ramping or deramping
No bid is imminent, no bid after PFS, no bid this year. Simple really, we are so far out of date with the PEA, that we require a PFS to see an updated value of the company, and to get some idea of the CFP.
All the best.

Don't be silly ssmith_trader, of course I am not. I just call it as I see it.
You are correct on volume, it's what keeps the share price in its current range. We require a higher profile as a company. Also diverse book, means many shares are not traded leading to our current situation.
It's just a case of it is what it is.

Sorry Mog, that post on derampers is not true.
I have seen many in the same vein.
If these people were telling the truth, we would be inundated with financial misconduct cases.
These individuals are just fantasists.

So BBG, when we have our replacement, you will come on here and say sorry for talking utter tosh.
Your thinking is because the company says we are appointing a CEO, means they are liars, and so you believe the complete opposite.
At least you are consistent in the rubbish you spout.

I think the PEA is way out of date. The PFS will give us more guidance, however my calculation will be 70% of the BFS.

Stevie you are a nasty piece of work. It's me that has been correct, when I said no bid is imminent or in the near future. It's me along with a few other posters, who barely post these days, that have called out the conspiracy theorys. You just post out of ignorance and insult others when you don't get your own way. Grow up.
This chatroom has become riddled with self talk.

Zoros, you are suffering from non reading again. No one is saying that, please reread.

https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/outlook/4689-outlook-delete-email-after-sending.html

This is just one-way to delete unread emails. Tools exist in IT departments, often scripted by administration.

Morning Shipright, expiry dates can be put on emails before sent. This doesn't enable autodeleting at a certain date on its own, but their are a number of tools that you can employ to do this. This method is often used in commercial business, where ideas are being exchanged, but nothing has been decided, and you want to keep discussions confidential.

FKCapital, this is just low volume. Because most shares are not traded, as held by the main stakeholders. ( part of the diverse book argument, that so many of here don't understand). Then small amounts of shares are offered up, and we trade within that window. When the shares offered up, get snapped up, we get more blocks offered up. Just low volume, nothing sinister.

FKCapital, th

Bubble they are running a company to bring Alpala to production, although the share price is important, as with any company they are more concerned with the day to day running, as is true with any other company.
It's only people on here that think, the company is treating shareholders badly, because they haven't sold out cheap for a rapid return.
That is not in the best interests of the company or it's shareholders.

All the best.

Thank you Mog, I expect you are referring to point 7.
To be fair, this is just a selling point of owning CGP shares. If a bid was imminent I feel CGP would have been snapped up by now.
They say they are happy with Solgold's direction, so maybe our defense strategy that stops us being taken out cheaply, extends to CGP, We all await the PFS for some clarity.

One thing I noticed is that CGP used to own 7.6% of Solgold and now only own 6.9%.
I suspect this is because CGP have not taken part in the latest issues and thus been diluted or they may have been selling some on the open market. Or maybe a bit of both.

DBW I have not seen the statement that CGP want to cash in their position in Solgold. I have seen that they are currently happy with the direction Solgold are taking.
Please could you post the evidence that says they want to cash in.

My guess and only a guess, is that CGP are happy with Solgold's position, as they will be able to monitise their 15% share of ENSA to meet their future costs.

That is my take. Which would match what both companies are saying.

Thank you Costa, as I have been saying for years, the diverse book, means a bid is almost impossible. I have understood this for some time. Yet have been subjected to ridicule from our resident clowns and others that can't see this.
Solgold has a good story, but patience is required.
In order for any bid to succeed, it means that the institutional shareholders must sell for less than full value. Why would they do that.

Zoros it's not 2029, it's 2025 for first production.
I hope we are all alive in 2029

Zoros the long term holders are not dying off, we just are taking part in this forum less, as we are fed up with the clowns who keep saying a bid is coming. They have been saying that for 9 years that a bid is imminent.
We will hold on.

That's my take on it Kohaku01.
Just to add we have the tonnage at surface as well in Tandyama, so 2025 is still on the cards.
So we get a PFS with a lower cost to production, and we achieve it quicker.
It's all guesswork on here, not long to wait for the PFS. That will hopefully add some clarity.

Your too kind Zoros, some people are just nuts.

Ortherncopper, I have known for sometime you are goldfingerer, I won't be drawn into an argument with your idiotic postings.