Member Info for Quady

Slug again what you say make's no sense.

You argue like a child about left and right politics without understanding the terms left and right.

This defines politics.

Both left and right understand this , yes we get a few loons, but even China is getting board.

Before you start posting about china and coal mines, do some research first soat least you try to understand what's happening.

Also those that don't get on board will end up costing you more .

You made the point some time ago that people were paying for my exported solar.

No they are paying for not reducing their carbon footprint.

Slug you are a liar or a complete fool, or both.

It was 20 million years ago when the Earth was 1,000 parts per million.

No human life existed because not only could it not exist, it couldn't even start.

Evidence attached below.

I show evidence you show video's which are unsubstantiated.

https://earth.org/data_visualization/a-brief-history-of-co2/

Ok slug challenge the science then.

Show me peer reviewed study that shows climate change is a hoax.

Not a you tube video, or some idiot has posted.

Start off by explaining how we got from 200 ppm to roughly 425 ppm in such a short time period.

Try explaining why the natural worlds carbon sync's are saturated and why CO2 levels are climbing and not going down.

Slug yet again you show yourself to be the most unintelligent poster on here.

You are now saying Science is a cult/religion.

Kat2008 I realise you are not quite right.

You support Putin without any knowledge on the region.

You are a climate denier.

It wouldn't surprise me to find out you follow some religion or pseudo religion .

Then you would have the complete set of nonsense going on in your head, which would go some way to explaining why you think the way you do.

Morning addicknt, it was an example showing what I do .

If people have Solgold shares in pensions then the don't have to have dividends to crystallise assets, in order to have available cash for drawdown.

That's one example.

Also people moving share's from a private holding to an account happens.

But the most common is day traders who set limits making small amounts of money.

So they sell at a level set and then set a buy level just high enough to make say fifty pounds.

On a day with limited trading, this can look like manipulation to those that have no idea about trading.

It's simple, if these fools think share price manipulation is happening, go to the relevant authority and summit your evidence.

You are right not to buy into this nonsense.

Just another reason why volume matter's.

It stops this type of nonsense, as the price usually goes one way or another and these trades become more difficult to make.

As usual Slug you remain the most unintelligent poster on here.

I have had other plonkers like you suggest trades that I have made in other shares were people manipulating the share price.

So as usual you are talking rubbish.

With trades of those sizes, it doesn't have to be someone playing with the book.

I do this in my SIPP.

When I get dividends, I get some crystallised and some uncrystallised.

If I want to take tax free income. I will sell shares in the uncrystallised to the value of 75% of the amount I want to crystallise .

I will then crystallise 100% of the sum and take 25% tax free, then buy back the same amount of shares in my crystallised fund.

Meaning I get a tax free lump sum and that any further dividends on those shares are in my crystallised fund and can be taken as income.

I suspect loads of people do this.

You're the only goon here Slug.

The CO2 is the highest since man has been on the planet.

The man-made part is the thing we measure.

But you cannot even work that out.

Have a look at the scale for the last five million years lol.

That's not a period made up to suit any argument.

If you as a supposed mathematician cannot see the corolation, then you are obviously a fraud.

What a ridiculous post from ColonelDrake, since when are Anglo American just like Solgold.

Madpunter how were they meant to get there and maintain security.

Also cannot have virtual meetings for confidential discussions.

Why don't you believe the science.

Which part do you disagree with.

Madpunter what are you on about, did you even listen to the announcement.

Try listening Slug is 100% wrong.

You can't define it in any other way.

Slug like usual is just lying.

Slug you have listened to this on some chat or something have you listened to what was said.

The 2045 target is the same.

The short term target of 2030 was abandoned.

This is because it was front loaded.

You really do talk some rubbish.

Try and get your head round this.

The target is the same for 2045 nothing has been kicked into the grass.

Good grief I don't know how I can explain it to you in any simpler terms.

Slug you are unable to understand.

You say a deadline that has been six years is kicked into the long grass.

What utter rubbish.

The 2045 deadline is the same as today.

Which bit didn't you understand.

Good grief Slug.

You continue to get everything wrong.

The greens in Scotland have said that the 2030 target cannot be met.

But the 2045 target is still nailed on.

So a more linear approach.

Madpunter listen to the bloke.

This wasn't a funded project so had no funding, it was a conversation he had.

He was trying to make a ridiculous point.

Everything in that talk screams out fake news.

Madpunter if you cut population by 33% then you would have 44 million as opposed to 67 million.

That was the population in 1909.

Immigration isn't as big a problem as you think, give it ten years and we will require more immigration, otherwise we will not be able to pay pensions, man the NHS, or many other professions.

In the 1970's we had 6 working people for every pensioner.

In 2050 we are predicted to have 2 working people for every pensioner.

This pattern is being replicated in the western world.

You haven't listened to it have you madpunter.

It says exactly that.

The expert doctor says he was told by a researcher at Oxford university that they couldn't print the truth otherwise they would lose funding.

Complete rubbish as there was no funding to lose.

Sorry you and Mathersfinger might be taken in by this rubbish but I am not.

Madpunter experts explain their reasoning and provide evidence why a peer reviewed study is wrong, so it can be reassessed.

You don't go on GB news or twitter.

Madpunter the video that Mathersfinger put up made the assertion that Oxford University would have their funding withdrawn.

Which was a lie as no funding had been given.

The reason many care home workers were afraid of the Covid vaccine was because people like you and Mathersfinger was taken in by false stories.