Member Info for Quady

Slug you are a fool.

It's not government that has intentionally lied.

It's the oil companies, the tabacoo companies.

The bank's.

Who do you think is going to administer the country.

Yes government makes mistakes, but so does everyone.

The point is to correct them.

You seem to think a free market is the answer.

Just look at the extreme poverty in the USA.

Poverty has gone up massively under the last government.

I voted for Boris Johnson.

A mistake I admit.

I am concerned about the budget on the 30th, but things need to change, and this lot may make much needed improvements.

You are constrained by your political dogma.

Try thinking in terms of solutions, not talking about left, right and woke.

These

Good grief metatron you have been reading propaganda on the internet about batteries catching fire.

The reason they catch fire isn't down to the batteries.

It's down to the bad build quality, and high resistance connections.

Up to now these in the main have been Chinese builds.

However builds have become better and are improving.

David you use the term left wing woke.

Are you a child who uses these terms because of lack of knowledge and understanding.

You haven't provided any evidence.

As for politicians they have visions, but cannot always deliver.

Listening to Wes Streeting now.

Huge vision for the NHS.

I find it amazing how the idiots don't believe science.

Jezzoo you say you know more than Nobel winning scientists.

As for politicians they

David you are full of misinformation.

It wasn't meant we were meant to enter a new ice age, it was we were overdue for one.

This is down to climate change.

The ozone layer was under real threat.

It was measurable.

If the entire world hadn't banned CFC's, we would have had cancers, crop failure and the planet eventually becoming uninhabitable for humanity.

Maybe you should read up about the purpose of the ozone layer and how it works.

Yes global warming is true and measurable and linked to Co2 and other greenhouse gases.

Only imbeciles deny it.

Every major scientist from every country accepts that.

Yes we have a few scientists who are in disagreement , but not one of them has put up a peer reviewed study to put forward their points.

It's not their view's don't stand up to scrutiny, it's just they are complete fantasy and a first year student studying chemistry could disprove them.

On car's remember the diesel car fiasco was about NOX.

Governments thought they were doing the right thing by lower emission diesel engines , only to be proved by science that they were just as harmful if not more.

So no government conspiracy, governments got it wrong, it was science that corrected them.

I have challenged slug many times to show the mathematics that he disputes about climate change.

He slithers off into the background as he cannot he knows he is wrong.

Still waiting slug, but I won't hold my breathe.

Car companies are going to either have to go electric or hydrogen or some other clean fuel in the future.

Otherwise there will be no market for their products.

Just a question of market forces.

Even you can't be that big an idiot.

At that time.

200 million years ago.

The earth was much hotter than today.

Human life couldn't have existed.

As the earth was still too hot and volcanic.

You really are an imbecile.

You're a imbecile slug.

We prove it by looking at historical data, through ice cores, sediment , the fossil record Trees , dead ones not living ones

We then look at the data.

Surprise surprise, we get to the industrial revolution and co2 climbs rapidly.

That proves the man made part.

Next we look at climate sensitivity, to work out the effects on a global scale.

Guess what we see Co2 linked to a warming planet .

All the experiments and science since is about disproving or supporting the evidence we have.

Read the NOAA and NASA data, or are all these people bought by the Chinese government, because they use their data.

Slug just post one single peer reviewed paper by any scientist that supports your views.

You can't because one doesn't exist.

Therefore you try to discredit science to support your views

You are the leading imbecile on here.

If you are a scientist publish a paper on climate change that disproves it.

You will of course need to show facts and supporting evidence.

If you cannot do that.

Look at the peer reviewed articles and disprove them.

Slug you do not have a science degree.

You are a liar.

If you did, you would understand peer review.

You don't.

Yes Wikipedia is publicly updated.

Yes a few errors, but mostly accurate.

You are a complete fool.

When you don't understand something you change the subject or try discrediting science or the scientific process or the scientists themselves.

If you are

Slug as you don't know what a scientist is, may I suggest you look it up on Wikipedia.

Again you prove yourself to be the biggest imbecile on here.

Rubbish slug, when was Co2 3,000 parts per million, when humans walked the earth.

It was before when it couldn't support human life.

For the 800,000 years we have records of, average global CO2 levels fluctuated between about 170 ppm and 280 ppm. Once humans started to burn fossil fuels in the industrial era, things changed rapidly. Only in the industrial era has the number risen above 300 ppm.9 May 2018

Good grief Slug you don't even know how the man made element is calculated.

You really are the biggest imbecile on here.

Of course it's been proven and its stood up to scrutiny.

What a scientist is.

Really you have the mind of a child.

Why don't you disprove that large pink and yellow spotty elephants that are invisible don't exist.

Equally as childish as your questions.

That's correct Slug if anyone can show a single fact that is fed into a body of evidence that doesn't support its conclusion then the theory of man made climate change fails to be a theory.

So far no one has done it as it would be broadcast worldwide.

I know how the scientific process works.

I had to, to test evidence.

No its not peer reviewed slug, are you going to bribe every scientist in the world.

You only need one fact that doesn't support your theory and it doesn't stand.

You really are a complete moron.

Ok your admission that you don't know how to fact check or gather evidence is noted slug.

Let's start with your ridiculous statement.

If someone said the moon is made of cheese that statement could never be peer reviewed.

Peer review means it is offered up to be scrutinized.

Therefore the person who says it's made of cheese must show the facts and how he got to that conclusion.

It's then offered up to his peers to check and scrutinize.

Ok your admission that you don't know how to fact check or gather evidence is noted slug.

Let's start with your ridiculous statement.

If someone said the moon is made of cheese that castatement could never be peer reviewed.

Peer review means it is offered up to be scrutinized.

Therefore the person who says it's made