Member Info for Qazwsx1

Go to Google and type in ‘do IgG tests work’ and ‘are IgG tests any good’. The first responses to each question should give you all the answers you need to know. Granting of more options anyone?

What people need to realise is those ‘sad’ ‘not invested’ ‘negative nellys’ etc called these results right. It is a forum for everyone, or are the ‘record protits’ ‘buyers piling in’ squad allowed to spout what has been proven to be wrong without anyone calling them out or offering an alternative viewpoint? You don’t need to be invested to offer what proved to be far nearer the mark than the rampers, who incidentally rarely offer anything other than spouting from the RNS - no opinion with a rationale how they come to said opinion. Each to their own, Good luck to anyone invested.

If only someone could have posted on here and warned us that it wasn't all rainbows and unicorns as some would have you believe!

No decent buys prior to results

No articles posted by resident rampers highlighting positive reviews on IgG testing ( a presumption as they are currently in the ‘green room’, but haven’t posted any as far as I can remember)

No recent news of note from the company other than they were attending some sort of presentation, well boogaloo!

And this from someone with a bottom drawer full of these bloody things!!

From the Association of British Dietitians.

IgG blood test

This blood test looks at IgG antibodies to specific foods present in your blood. The test claims that an increase in IgG to a certain food indicates intolerance to that food. IgG antibodies to food are found in all healthy adults & children who do not show any symptoms.

There is currently no convincing evidence to support this test and it is not recommended as a diagnostic tool.

There are lots of negatives from medical experts regarding food intolerance tests, which have been posted on this forum which is relevant to the share. What I find alarming is that there is no response from posters with an alternative view who could post positives from medical experts (not test manufacturers). I still hold some shares here so, like others, should be ramping away without any rationale ( I would have to green bin myself obviously)but unfortunately there is a reality to current intolerance testing and the evidence from the experts doesn’t make good reading. It’s a good job the company has many other potential income streams……..oh hang on a minute

From Dr Andre Sommer - Caracare

Dubious providers take advantage of the despair of those affected and offer an apparently simple but expensive solution. With just a few drops of blood that you take at home, they promise to be able to recognize intolerance to hundreds of foods. Tests at home—especially the so-called IgG test—should be used with great caution because the IgG test is not suitable for diagnosing food intolerance.

"Experts and doctors agree: the IgG test is not suitable for diagnosing food intolerance!"

– Prof. Stefan Lüth, MD, Clinic Director, Chief Physician and Medical Director of the Clinic for Gastroenterology, Diabetology and Hepatology at the Brandenburg City Hospital.

More waffle from a troll, says the one who continually rants they’re being picked on and cyber bullied. Troll???? I asked a reasonable question, I wouldn’t expect you to answer as you have proved on a number of occasions that you appear incapable of answering the simplest of questions but just resort to childish antics. Don’t bother replying because to be honest as I only saw your post as I wasn’t logged in therefore had no filters on. By the time you read this you’ll be filtered as I genuinely don’t think you bring anything at all of interest to investors. You rant against anyone who questions the company but can’t offer any justified opinions other than posting bits that suit from the RNS’s, (which we’ve all seen). Other than that you may provide an occasional winning horse tip, though why you put that on here goodness only knows, it’s not as if you ever engage with a bit of banter with regular posters. Good luck with your investments, but for the benefit of investors/potential investors/ those with an interest please be more engaging and dare I say in a more polite and friendly manner.

If, as posted by some on here, the results that are due in 14 days are going to be so good why isn't there lots of buying going on? Appreciate that it could happen closer to the date (probably won't), however why would you wait?

Buy on rumour-sell on news, not with this company apparently!

Regarding the IgG tests, the vast majority of reports that I have seen, have been quite negative when coming from medical professionals. Simply type into Google 'Are IgG tests any good' and Captain Swag has posted the first response and the second response from a BBC article states ' There has been a lot of interest in linking the gut symptoms that people suffer when eating some foods with IgG antibodies, but despite some researchers finding links, no diagnosis of a food intolerance can be made from an IgG test. Your IgG antibody levels will fluctuate daily depending on what you have been eating recently. In fact, some researchers have been working on a way of using IgG tests as a means of telling exactly what someone has been eating!

Having a positive IgG result to certain foods does not indicate that you have an ‘intolerance’ to those foods.

The advice from expert groups around the world is that IgG tests should not be used as an attempt to diagnose an intolerance.

I should add neither of these responses are sponsored replies to the google question.

It would seem that having trimmed their portfolio, CNSL have banked on a somewhat dubious product. Mind you in their own words only 6 years ago CD4 was the Jewel in the crown and look how that ended!!

'how many times do we have to explain the system?'

So is that an admission of coordinated systematic attacks on sp here collectively by themselves and others here to gain financially at someone else's expense. Thank you very much for your admission, more evidence produced by yourself.

You can’t argue with that logic Captain, well you could obviously, but you’d be wasting your time!!

Calder, with due respect your response makes no sense whatsoever.

Erskine, you are probably stating my posts are from Captain Swag out of mischief, but as you have an interest in the share I will ask you what I asked Calder to clarify. Do you honestly believe that negative posts on here could have an effect on the share price and if so, if large amounts of shares are bought following any negative posts that allegedly hold the share price low, would those large purchases not move the share price upwards?

No you didn’t, you made reference to green binning, it should have been a one word answer. I did state that Fakey may (yes may) not be alone in the green stripe room much longer or words to that effect, however if I did filter you I do not think there is anything preventing the unfiltering. Also I asked you to clarify a point relating to your post, now obviously you don’t have to and are free to write what you want either with rationale or without, but does this really lead to a constructive forum on a share? I’m going to assume that you aren’t going to oblige me and others how you came to your conclusions regarding big buys after negative posts and how those big buys failed to move the SP so best to leave it at that. Good luck with your investments.

Still can’t answer the simplest of questions !!!

‘ My one question to you then in response would be how can you be commenting on any posts I post after you supposedly green filtering/binning me in November of last year?’

Can I ask who this post was directed at? Surely this is a question that can be answered or am I expecting too much

Captain,

I think you could be right, I don’t think I could have been more specific, ah well I tried. More fool me for expecting a rational response.

Apologies if I didn’t make myself clear, I was referring to the re-posted section of your post and not about the buys as sells etc. You state that the usual posters with a differing view to yours regarding the share, keep the SP lower allowing big buys to come in at a lower price. I have a couple of issues regarding this, in that I do not believe for a second that a couple of posters on a chat board can influence the SP to that effect and also as the posters to whom I believe you are referring to, are consistent and frequent posters then surely these big buys coming in following their posts would cause the SP to rise. Your explanation of the event contradicts itself.

“ Along with certain posters on here deliberately attempting to keep share price low so that large amounts of shares are bought later for whom and why? ”

Please could you clarify the above as the initial wording would suggest this is a factual statement rather than your opinion.

Posted 29 May by Erskine

Company is in a multi-billion marketplace where they are already selling to some 100 countries.

Posted today by Erskine

huge potential here from a company with so few shares in issue, and being a major exporter to almost 100 countries.

These statements would indicate a reduction in countries who CSNL are selling to, over a 21 day period, either that or you were just merrily ramping away!! Ps. I wouldn’t bother asking Walbrook how many countries they have sold to in the last 12 months because they can’t answer either!!

Good luck to LTH