RE: New company’s - Georgia21 Sep 2019 18:21
Part 2
3.5. Pursuant to Article 96 1 1 of the same Code, "an administrative authority shall, in the course of administrative proceedings, examine all the circumstances relevant to the case and make a decision on the basis of an assessment and concurrence of those circumstances."
file: ///tmp/tomcat8-tomcat8-tmp/476e1f2c-ab9b-46f4-aaac-14c1f8d93e8b.html 1/2
5/17/2019 3 NAPR
3.6. According to Article 5 of the Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs, the registering authority is this law
Issues determined within its competence make decisions for registration and access to information under the Law of Georgia on Public Registry.
3.7. The legal and procedural issues for keeping the register of entrepreneurs and non-profit legal entities are defined by the Instruction “On Registration of Entrepreneurs and Non-Entrepreneurial (Non-commercial) Legal Entities”, dated December 31, 2009 by the Minister of Justice of Georgia.
3.8. Pursuant to Article 18 of the said Instruction, the Agency shall make a decision on registration if there are no grounds for finding a defect, terminating the registration proceedings or refusing to register.
3.9. In accordance with the rule established by the foregoing norms, the decision-making authority is under the obligation of the registering authority to conduct a thorough, accurate, comprehensive examination of the circumstances of the case and to decide on the basis of their concurrence.
4. Conclusion:
4.1. As a result of the mismatch between the facts of the case and the requirements of the law, the registration authority considers that the documentation submitted by the person concerned does not meet the registration requirements.
4.2. In order to uphold the principle of legality in the field of public administration, the National Agency of Public Registry,
decided:
1. Suspend registration.
2. To eliminate the identified defect - 30 calendars