Member Info for PuzzledPete

I see that this poster has been on this board for only 8 months. During when he has posted an average of 8 a day on 8 companies - as if he can know anything much about any of them. On the contrary I have been writing research and sometimes posting about (often with aliases for reasons any professional analyst would understand) many companies in different sectors of the energy market for over 20 years including for a major bank. In particular I started warning about Kibo, - a similarly managed and 'researched' company to Mast -, in 2016 - admittedly some time before it eventually went bust. The whole energy sector is much more problematic than someone like JamersTrader seems to understand. Yet LSE has apparently allowed him - when it seems obvious he just wants to trade - to have deleted my factual posts. Seeing what I have of what is going on here might have enraged me admittedly, so I have been a bit forthright in my posts . That is the only reason anyone can have 'banned' them.

Do explain why companies with long experience in flexible and otherwise power generation can't provide power for data centres. Please tell us what 'research' you have done. I've had over 20 years experience in the sector and its obvious you are ignorant about its realities.

Mast is NOT the only UK company in this potential market. It has only some 2 plantssoon in operation, two more possibly building with no obvious complete funding, a few more in 'planning' but again no announced funding. Against that there are large groups who together have over 600 plants and plenty of funds. Mast is the only one listed, and anyone intelligent would ask why ? Its because the returns are insufficient to keep a listed company going. Its why the only other company ever listed went bust. Do some intelligent research.

Err ! a couple of hours seems to have passed

Mr batch ! Why should anyone post anything "even remotely beneficial to someone investing in the share or considering". ?

Tell us why please. Is this a" gullible Met1 investors benefit fund" or something ? Interested to know your reasoning in case we'v all missed something

And that £2.6m all went to pay off a mere £0.8m or so of Riverfort's then £3m or so loan, plus £1.4m to 'progress' Bordersley plus £415,570 'working capital' (which is about 6 months company overheads - ie to December)

But at end June total liabilities repayable this year and next were £4.8m - so still insolvent to the tune of about £2.2m.

That needs 44% of the cash warrants (exercisable immediately - ie 55m new shares) must be issued adding to the 125m pre-paids, and adding up to at least 194million shares just to escape current insolvency. (ie at least 6 times current 'admitted' shares ) To get any more cash so as to pay for a share of any other venture, all those 195 other cash warrants will have to be exercised and admitted immediately. Maid and Trader don't seem to understand that that will all but wipe out their current share of Mast. Sad really. But, as Einstein said "The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence has its limits"

Astonishingly ignorant and reckless puff from our duff friend at Sunday Roast - Hornsby - two weeks ago. (no invest qualifications or experience and SR is not regulated or authorised to disseminate 'investment advice'). He bandied around that the jv would generate a vast share price for Mast .

The reality( from a thorough search at companies house of its directors and any other connections) is that Carbon Zero Markets is a mickey mouse outfit, with no track record in developing generators (except via one director in a tiny one it probably bought from someone else) It has no money to speak of (like Mast), no obvious financial backers, and no apparent connections or reputation in the industry, (although one director was once a director at Pyebridge before Mast bought it as a wreck). Compare that with Krugel's description of it in his 30Sept press release.

It's like his past boasts, few of which have materialised. As for finding a financial backer for this 'fantastic AI opportunity' what happened to Powertree and its rich Hartree owner ? Not a word.

Again, like all Krugel's past 'joint ventures' of which none have ever come to fruition. An experienced observer and company specialist would guess they signed a preliminary agreement, took a closer look, and skedadlled..

Astonishingly ignorant and reckless puff from our duff friend at Sunday Roast - Hornsby. (He has no invest qualifications or experience and SR is not regulated or authorised to disseminate 'investment advice'). He bandied around that the jv would generate a vast share price for Mast .

The reality( from a thorough search at companies house of its directors and any other connections) is that Carbon Zero Markets is a mickey mouse outfit, with no track record in developing generators (except via one director in a tiny one it probably bought from someone else) It has no money (like Mast), no obvious financial backers, no apparernt connections or reputation in the industry, (although one director was once a director

Totally unable to join any dots again eh Maidit ? Ever worked out what cash Mast is desperate for if it is to 1) escape from its present insolvency ? 2) have any cash at all left over to contribute to even just one successor to Hindlip 3) Do you understand that if it doesn't contribute, it will receive no share of any successors' income ? 4) Do you know that Mast's overheads are running higher than what it might get from both Pyebridge and Hindlip ? 5) Do you know what insolvency is ? 6) Do you know that all possible cash from the pre-paids is not enough to escape insolvency by itself. 7) Do you know that anything it gets from the cash warrants, which it desperately needs

to meet everything above, will involve the immediate issue of the warrant shares, and not the 12 month deferment possible fore the pre-paids.. There you are. Some dots for you to try to join up, and convince even yourself to stop posting drivel. If you keep posting we'll know for sure the level of your IQ.

Sorry wrong thread. But might be relevant

I see jamesTrader still at it.

Here is what he seems to have had deleted. He doesn't seem to realise that he is wel and truly now in the camp of those trying to manipulate the shares. Mayne he hasn't read LSE's warning below

ACF Track Record Oct 18 11:11

Mr JamesTrader take note. The hole you are digging for yourself gets deeper and deeper. ACF Equity Research has published on other companies directly linked with with Pieter Krugel, Mast's CEO. In Dec 2021 ACF published on Eurasia Mining whose chairman Christian Schaffalitzky was also chairman of Kibo where Krugel was CEO. ACF used the same questionable and incompetent methodology as for Mast with a EUA share 'target' of '115p-127p' compared with the then sub 5p share price. Its similar 'targets' for EUA a few years before had been such as to persuade investors to chase the shares up from 4p in 2019 to between 30p and 40p in early 2021. Both those predictions proved wrongs, seeing the shares crash to under 10p only a few months later, and to continue on down, never to recover. They’re now about 5p

It used the same bogus methodology for Kibo Energy, paid for by the company when ieter Krugel was CEO. ACF 'initiated' research in Oct 2021 when Kibo shares were 22p. IACF stated a 'value range' of £1.51-£1.59. By Jan 2023 the shares were 12.5p when ACF updated with a 'value range' of £3.02-£3.18. By April 2023 Kibo's shares were 0.8p when again ACF 'updated' with a 'value range of £2.50-£2.63. By June 2024 Kibo was essentially bust and the shares 0.6p.

ACF has used exactly the same bogus, incompetent,, and grotesquely exaggerating 'methods' for its July 'research on Mast, again paid for by Krugel . Its method has been comprehensively demolished step by step in earlier posts. For obvious reasons such 'research' is not legally allowed to be available to private investors. Yet it is being promulgated through a pack of proven to be fake 'press' comments and recommendations, as well as on here via a web site that clearly shows it is part of a 'marketing campaign'. There is only one possible source for planting these reports, and it must be the Vancouver based PR firm Fairfax Partners (allied with the Puerto Rico based 'advisers; who dreamed up the warrants schemes for Mast and MetalsOne) who Mast has announced it has agreed to pay a whopping £2million fee 'to promulgate itself to international investors' When it hasn't even got the cash to pay all its trade creditors.

All this is available for anyone to check is completely correct. But of course the likes of JamesTrader and Maidit don't dare to do so.

Thank goodness for that.

I've just noticed that, amazingly, the fake UKFinancePulse puff that Mast allegedly 'warned against' has just appeared on this page ! Others are still appearing elsewhere.

I see our resident mega ramper has posted an average of 3 a day in all his 10 years on this board. Of the 7 shares shown he's interested in (only last few months acc to the piechart but doesn't mean he's not been commenting far longer) the charts show every single one (inc Mast) has been tanking over last few years inc one bust and one lost 90%. The rest down 30-50%. His latest, CPAI spiked to 9p this year and is now 3p. All speaks for itself. Any normal person would stop posting here for shame. But these rampers can't stop.

If they have Mr JT they have checked that my facts are right. Or maybe the fca has told them.

Well Well Mr JT. Pyebridge is NOT producing a profit for MAST, and won't for many years. Do you not understand what 'revenue' is ? If you had bothered (or been able) to read MAST's accounts you would know that gas costs about 70% of revenue while other operating costs take at last 5%.. So Pyebridge's net profit before tax is running at less than £600,000 pa, out of which it has to repay Riverfort's near £2 million loan. If Mast boats it is repaying it from revenue, that is another of its economies with the truth, because it will have to pay for the gas separately. Hindlip will be even less profitable for Mast because 75% of it goes to Powertree. All follow-on plants the same. I hope you understand that you are invested in MAST, and not in Pyebridge. But you probably don't.

JS No more ? Has he topped himself ? With his consortium's vast holdings its quite likely his 'partners' have lured him to a room with a balcony in a high building

Thought I'd peek in to see how our tycoon investment guru is getting on. I see the sage thinks posts here have reached a quality low. Wonder when he's going to average down ? After all, this is his big, dead, cert. I'll wait and see. Meanwhile I wonder if his consortium members wonder what I'm wondering. Where does he get the time to 'manage' all his other ventures and by definition theirs ?

Edison's reports are generally conservative as regards a 'target price' for the shares which, correctly, they base on the future value of dividends to the shares. Correct because that is what shareholders will definitely see. That is different to most other analysts who, incorrectly, base it on the company's own valuation of their future net profits (aka Kefi's NPV, not the NPV a professional investor would calculate based on the long term return he would want). So most analyst's grossly exaggerate their 'target price', while Edison stays conservative. All very abstruse, so the share usually gyrrates between the two as private investors chase the highest broker target and don't bother about their long term returns, and professionals wait until they can be sure of the higher long term returns they want. Conclusion ? Expect this surge to peter out while construction proceeds, only to re-surge higher when certain income comes within range. I'm staying put.

Go ahead. Keep digging your own hole. Be aware that, for instance, one of the outlets Mast has used to puff itself to investors is Roast PR, (Sunday Roast) who are not authorised by the FCA to talk to investors. Ditto, ACF Equity Research also is not directly authorised to do so. These are all indications to beware . If you deter such information being posted here, you will be guilty of market manipulation and liable to 10 years in chokey.