Member Info for PuzzledPete

PS Chavitravi. There were similar block-heads arguing against the similar Met1 scam's true value all the way down the shares descent to the bottom. Its taking a bit longer here - slowed by Krugel's desperate new wheeze annoucements. I predict there will be even more. I also predict there will be no mention of any funding for them.

Chavitravi. Einstein said 'stupidity should be researched thoroughly, because there's so much of it about'

Tbhatt. All thoroughly explained starting with my post 31 Oct 10:11 through others but mainly 5 Nov 11:19. All there for anyone who can read and understand. Passed by and trashed by those never got beyond John and Jane Ladybird starter book.

Explaining 'logic' to Clintec and Co is like trying to explain quantum physics to the backward class at kindergarten. No point in bothering.

60p plus ? Do explain why a then market cap of £234 million will be justified for net assets of less than £10m and no money to build one 7MW peaker let alone £billions for AI data centres. Genuinely want to know. Like you I'd like to make a £zillion profit. So kind.

SoftBank sells entire stake in Nvidia amid AI bubble fears

I see Mr traderMan still block-headedly ignoring or misreading the evidence to mislead others. Its not just the groups such as Kread lists, it is the more than 650 I've counted and anyone can, and probably more than 1,000 single peak generating plants, some owned by large groups, bidding for capacity market payments who are obviously in the same market as Mast . (where Krugel in his usual misleading way boasts Mast is the 'only' one - conveniently forgetting to add that it is the 'only' listed one. The others aren't 'stockmarket listed' because the sector is too competitive, erratic, and low margin to support a listing whereas they have the funds to stay in it. In fact one other large group was recently thinking of completely withdrawing from the sector. There was only one other 'listed' co in it r similar to Mast and it went bust, for the same reason Mast is insolvent and well on the way to beingtotally bust. But carry on lying Mr TraderMan. You are steadily being seen for the fraud you are and as a joke.

Once again Krugel trumpeting ambitions he has no hope of achieving. Navon has even less of a track record and even less money than Carbon Zero. Navon appears to be a co-op of various technology consultants, claiming 'ventures' which a look at their records (if any) don't have anything solid to their names.

The following is an example "Navon World is a global datacentre and deep technology company, designing, developing and operating datacentre infrastructure for HPC, AI, Quantum Computing and Crypto Mining. For more details, visit Navon's website here - https://www.navonworld.com." Visit it and discover there are none planned, building, or operating anywhere.

Its all shades of the Indian 'consortium' back when, which disappeared into thin air after promising tons of funding for Mast.

Even if anything solid were to be signed, neither Mast nor Cabon Z nor Navon have any funds to develop . Mast would have to be recapitalised (look it up) big time and current shareholders would be wiped out. IWith Krugel's record of boasts against achievement, no one in the City would give a company run by him anything.

There used to be in the City what were called 'barrow boys'. Self explanatory.

Obviously both.

Invester. You really should read the company's own news releases. No wonder you don't know what's going on.

I've said so before Invester. I've known and followed this co since its 2021 IPO and Krugel for Kibo's last six years before it went bust - for basically the same reasons Mast will. I've been accurate about all the incompetence and false promises he and co have made to cover up their own incompetence and reckless projects to try to get naive investors to pay to get Kibo and Mast out of the mess he has created. I'm still following and post about it all until its ultimate demise. Get used to it. I've had to do the same for some other companies but have never seen such a scandal as this one. Get used to that too.

What you don't understand Invester is that the company 'might' (very unlikely) be worth more. Bu the only way it could be so means the shares will be each worth considerably less. In fact considerably less even if Mast survives - which is questionable. It seems that you, like your fellows on here, don't understand company financing and how that relates to shares and their price..

LSE is also complicit of course sav, hosting only recently on this page one of the fake ramping sites. And I see instead of the 83.1 million shares announced last week, it still shows only 32 odd million . Reality is a £16 million market cap for a co still insolvent and no profit in sight. But of course the rampers here can't work that out, and probably still believe the generators belong to them, whereas they belong to the lenders who they're in big hock to.

As for ACF Research, its incompetent and fraudulent paid-for ramping sky-high share prices for EUA and Kibo as well as for Mast has already been outed on here. But there's none so ignorant as won't/can't read or understand what's in front of them.

subscription needed for the full winnifrith warning

here it is .

last week i showed how quantum data energy (mast), then known as mast energy had used £2 million of a £5 million fund raise to pay firms which then placed bogus news stories from bogus newspapers, pretending to be genuine research claiming this was the uk’s cheapest share, to ramp its stock. but this gets worse.

on september 9 quantum put out a very weedy rns reach warning folks about these bogus articles, which, let us not forget, it had paid for. i am in no doubt that its hand was forced as its shares had zoomed from 15p to almost 200p on the back of this, and other, share pumping.

you would have thought that it would or could have told the firms commissioned, notably mavdb in puerto rico that they should desist from running such fake news. but no. pop up ads with strap lines such as “"the british stock that is minting millionaires from the ai energy boom" by the fake morningherald and "investors buying shares of mast today while it is still trading at attractive prices could see massive profits over the next few months" continue to appear on websites including london south east, zero hedge and even *************! they all come from paying google ad server.

if quantum boss peter krugel wanted to stop this surely as the paying customer he could. but he appears not to want to, perhaps because of all the warrants outstanding he’d like to see exercised, to keep his cash guzzling **** show on the road.

but there is further anecdotal evidence of the bezzle here. mast commissioned the research report below from acf equity research. it stated that at 79p the shares should 11 bag. they have, in fact, collapsed back to 20p.

the note basis its valuation on profits recasts which are less likely to be born out by reality than my predictions about my chances of hooking up with cheryl cole while watching west ham win the fa cup and premiership double on the telly. acf has form in this. you will remember that its predictions about sales and profitability at eurasia mining (eua) were 99% out and completely wrong respectively. but it pumped the shares allowing dodgy russians to sell shares making out like the bandits they patently were.

quite simply acf will publish wholly bogus forecasts provided by a listed company, without showing any critical analysis or professional sceptcism, in return for a cheque. krugel must know that the numbers mast supplied are pure fiction yet he paid for them to go out.

i note that as of 6 october acf equity research ltd is no longer fca regulated. it previously was regulated via the appointed representative route but is now not authorised to engage in regulated activities which, i take to mean, it cannot publish what it used to laughably refer to as “investment research.”

but its website and “research” on mast remain, pro tem, live.

this is such a monstrous scandal. anyone invested in quantum is literally insane

You've asked this before ironic. Do read back. Its all there.

As I said Sav, its no good putting figures and facts in front of someone clearly incapable of understanding them. His latest contradicts every bit of data; every explanation in the warrants prospectus. Every result reported by Mast . Don't know what on earth he thinks he is doing here. He's plainly backward and seeking attention. Best not to engage.

Why not think 1st command. Posters might be keeping a watch. Might be considering a buy or a sell and needing advice. Or trying to judge the knowledge, judgement, or intelligence of what is said by other posters. So judging by your moniker and your posts they won't be taking any notice of you .

I see Maidit 11:21 has been reposting the amazingly fraudulent, ignorant paid-for nonsense by the unregulated, unauthorised, no investment qualifications or experience at all or any other qualifications - Sunday Roast Hornsby - while Krugel stands by knowing they are grotesque lies.

" Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ0O34niXnE&t=278s 11 minute in MAST is looking to supply 24000 MW per month = £24000 per MW = £144M OF FREE CASH FLOW A YEAR over the next 3 years ?"

The truth (from 40 years experience business and financial analysis and forecasting engineering and energy companies for banks and institutions) was posted Nov 5th 11:19 onwards. - based on Mast's experience so far , Krugel's own statements, and its consultants' forecasts as well as other similar companies available on Companies House.

For a start, Mast only has 6.1 MW Pyebridge on stream partly this year with 8.1MW next. And Hindlip maybe next year 2H adding 7.5MW . Bordereley and Stather Road will add another 7 MW maybe from late 2026 but not fully until 2027. Five other minnows have no funding and no timeline. ie no sign of 24 MW yet except maybe 2028.

They will only earn a profit around £90,000 per MW pa BEFORE repaying the debts all four will have AND the 75% of the remaining profit going to whoever lends the cost such as Powertree and Riverfort and likely the other three. After those deductions the 'free cash flow' to Mast itself is forecast to be no more than £1 milllion or two if lucky.

Krugel must know this . yet alllowed Hornsby to make that fraudulent statement. Yet more evidence for the fca of his massive fraud.

The Conclusion posted Nov 5th was . Mast will get practically nothing from its generators for 2026 and only enough if lucky to cover its overheads in 2027 provided Bordersley comes on stream. So before 2028 it will still make heavy losses, to add to to its current debts where even after the mere £2.6m raised from the pre-paid warrants, it is still insolvent.

These statements reposted by Maidit and paid for by Krugel are so obviously 'fraudulent inducements to invest' - the criminal name for them - that the city boys in blue and the fca are bound to come after the perpetrators.

Extraordinary ignorance still on here by some. Maybe deliberate.

Anyone can confirm the number of Mast's reserve power competitors with much better funding, track record, and backing than Mast and with better credentials to supply the AI market - by just googling Capacity Market Auction results. There are too many to count, but I made over 650 three years ago.

Ditto they don't seem to understand the warrants. They are not just existing shares being sold, which when done will allow the rest to rebound. They are additions to total shares, each one diminishing their value.

Latest no of shares is 83.1 million, compared with only 13 million before the warrants. (figures post-1:40 share consolidation) - ie their value now only 1/6.4th of their pre-warrants value.

Those added have been 41.9 million pre-paids and 7.75m cash warrants. The pre-paids £5 million cash (less a whopping £2.4 million fee reflecting bust Mast's desperate need for it when no one else would cough up) has already been received. It is only the 7.75 million cash warrants that would have brought an extra £310,000 cash - enough for 5 months overheads.

Half all warrants expire January next, the other half July. Because already paid for, the remaining 20.6m pre-paids expiring January will definitely be admitted, otherwise the holders will lose the profit they were promised above a 4p share price - taking the total to at least 103.7 million.

On top there are still 117.25 million 4p cash warrants outstanding expiring in January. If Krugel is to get their £4.69 million cash that he desperately needs to get Mast out of insolvency he is going to have to keep the shares well above 4p, to give them the incentive.

Why else the desperate fraudulent paid-for bogus press recommendations, and even more bogus ACF Research (same as Krugel used before for EUA and Kibo who after initial price surges saw their shares crash to below the fairyland 'value ranges' when the truth emerged)

So if he wants that cash, total shares will have rocketed to 221 million shares. Meanwhile £7.6 million cash (worth a paltry 3.4p per share) will have got the balance sheet up to maybe £5 million in the black, but not enough to pay for any more plants. As for AI contracts - Its laughable.

And so it will go on until all warrants are cashed by next July - if at all - and shares are worth only 1/29th their pre warrant value.

Meanwhile a mere £12.6 million cash will have been added to Masts' current cash deficit of around £5 million, worth a paltry 3.3 pence per share and leaving enough cash to build one plant like Pyebridge which would contribute a mere £1 million pa (0.27 p per share) to Mast's £0. 6million pa overhead) - or three plants if they are majority financed by borrowings which would take almost all their profit in repayments for their first eight years.

Have a nice next few weeks.