Member Info for Propinquity

Remind me - how much does AST’s BoD have invested in it?

In4, Good to see you’re still on these boards - my favourite wordsmith. Have you recently invested in here?

Hey Chesh, I should hope to try it over the next few days. Cheers

Thanks.

How would I join?

A colleague of mine who has invested in here calls them HHs instead of MMs - short for helping-hands.

In the set of drawers labelled 'Don't open until next year'.

The brightly lit, numerous green ones at this junction of SML's roadmap completely overtake the only red one.

Lupi, I like that analogy - but where one sniffs money to be made, one follows the smell to put one's snout in the trough.

Lupi, Yes, the BoD declared that it would like no day-traders; however, it would be dubitable that that statement alone would deter potential day-traders from punting on SML, whose public indicators remain firmly signalling to a northerly direction, with plenty of electric-battery power to reach the aurora borealis - in the Arctic, of course. Moreover, SP Angel values LC at about 0.3p on its own; so who's right: the broker, the market, a combination of both - or have they all completely misjudged this company's worth? After all, the market is not always right.

Chesh, Interesting words to Google Like ears hark to a bugle To write words to the frugal

Brycen, Valid points. With positive PR over a combination of many interviews over the past year on financial-related media and of favourable RNSes, SML's encouragingly cash-generating, self-funding, and battery-mineral strategy should now be a distincty coherent message to would-be investors. However, from the lack of PIs' interest in this sleep-soundly-at-night share, it would seem they covet shares where they can pocket quick profits.

Have you ever encountered an AIM company whose share-price has reacted disproportionately negatively after more-or-less publishing nothing but good news for the past five months - and even before that? Maybe my lack of knowledge on the mystical mechanics of AIM fails my comprehending the uncooperative recoiling of the share-price to a ream of positive news - but the current valuation feels irrational.

How can the market - AIM, in this instance - be correct when it values very highly mining companies that have nothing but a shovel and a wheelbarrow for prospecting. It’s not always right - and certainly not on AIM.

I meant FTSE-250.

Confident to the extent that they aim to elevate the company to the FTSE.

Laalee, Too funny! But true.

Hey gmcc, A rational point; after all, with the CARE tenements - and now LCCM - in Australia, it would be entirely beneficial for the company to engage Australian investors who understand - and value - mining stocks better than those on AIM. Could that be the piece of news that would change the value of the company in the blink of an eye, as PW mentioned, a while ago?

Slurm, Thanks for reminding me of those heady days.

Wolf, It’s not specifically mentioned; it was more about Sing’s covering companies with a minimum value of £50m - and SML is valued at under just half that; so, why would it cover us?