Member Info for Propinquity

Bitcoiner, I like your posts - nothing wrong with your positivity: they piggyback as much on the publicly available information as do the negative ones. I maintain my view that with the right news, it will multi-bag.

https://www.**********.co.uk/articles/peter-wale-of-strategic-minerals-discusses-the-high-tin-grades-identified-to-the-west-of-the-established-redmoor-resource-9932a2c/

Based on the company’s past few years’ monumental misjudgments, Lupi’s outcome seems more likely - for example, look at Mustang, Alan Broome and Pete Wale’s SPAC, embroiled in a legal quagmire; the BoD possess not even one notable success in mining - anything; would you back them to be a success here?

This board’s off-putting - too many ‘ad hominemings’

At least seven years’ worth of magnetite - but that would depend on demand: if it increases, then less; if it decreases, more.

Bermuda, Ramping up for the approval, due in November - and not a moment too soon for EB sufferers.

Preston, Post of the day!

'These guys know what they are doing re the copper asset in Aus' - so much so that they publicly declared an August update for the market - still waiting - but, hey, they’ve got this.

LOL - Short-term crybabies: try three years, as a starter for ten, for those who have lost considerable sums from the blatant lies by the BoD - yet, I will agree with your insinuation that plenty of upside is on offer from this miserly price.

Quite simply: another jam-tomorrow RNS that spreads it thickly on a slice of good news for that sorely needed sugar-hit of a pick-me-up after feeling sour by reading stale crumbs of information - soul-leavening it is not.

They have their very own social-media influencer - https://twitter.com/styledgentleman?lang=en

Crouton, Surely that type of information would be RNS’ed if it were significant, non?

A pleasingly pocket-heavy combination for Alan Broome and John Peters, however.

Bule, With this company’s poor past record - misleading statements, missed timelines, misjudged commercial relationships and transactions - a healthy scepticism remains my best friend.

I’d rather gamble $250 buying more of EUZ’s shares - at least I would get something back!

Sdolygons, Agreed that Cobre underpins the current share-price - the reason why that, with the right news, it will multi-bag; but, boy, oh boy, it seems a long way from happening.

And from which magic money-tree will money be shaken to fund future drilling: dilution, loan, external finance - combined with a pay-cut for the BoD? Reality, folks, reality - this company’s finances remain firmly wedged between a rock and a hard place.

Soutwesterner, Thanks for the clarity - so, why do the BoD misleadingly push it as a tin-based project?

According to Southwesterner, yes.

Didn’t a wife of one of the directors buy a new kitchen when the shares were 2.2p-plus? They’ve succeeded in leaving a bitter aftertaste with their paradoxically undercooked and overcooked wobbly-wobbly flan of a strategy.