Member Info for ProfitSniffer

After tonight's atrocity, that is the simple message we all need to consider

Jesus Zoros - zero attention span or what? And afraid of your own shadow. What a mess you are flower.

Who would use a calculator for such simple arithmetic?

Having said that, if you asked a 16 year old with straight A stars to do it, they'd look blankly at you.

Finance it yes, build it never. There is and never has been any ability to do so. They couldn't project manage it either, they are useless

Put simply, they are explorers not miners.

Not simple, plainly wrong I'm afraid. But of course you will never admit that. There are countless examples where you have done this and attempted to reverse ferret by claiming you were simplifying. Did the poster as you to simplify for them? If not, then is not arrogant to think that they would not deserve or understand a more in-depth/accurate reply?

Or are you just trying to be a know it all when you know nothing?

"Yes if you get substantially more buys than sells the price will move up, but only when the MM's say so."

What a complete and utter moron. It's nothing to do with the MM's "saying so"

Market makers help provide a market by fulfilling an obligation to provide both bids and offers at a minimum of the EMS as defined by quarterly market parameters (currently 300,000) shares

There is no "say so" from one or more market makers to allow the price to rise or fall. What an uninformed prat you are.

Which "sophisticated" or otherwise sites don't simply use the spread at the time of the print to determine buy, sell or unknown? How many people are still totally unaware that an AT is both a buy and a sell because it is a buy matched with a sell on the order book yet it is only ever reported once?

So true volume = OB + 2xAT

I can lay claim to 38 of the IDs on Bob's filter list. I hate to think of the useful insights on trading and Level 2 he has missed out on in recent years.

Response lost by LSE. But short version - yes I want conflict on Saturday. I want to batter those twats that fly Palestine flags and hate the UK.

I don't want the UK to be a totalitrian regime like the "whites" you list, Russia, North Korea, China. I want Britain to be proud of its heritage and defend itself against Islam. I went on to agree that Connolly was a genius and say that comedy has been taken from us by the wokes because anything funny is offensive and anything offensive is bad in their snowflake world

Botswana, Tanzania, Benin, Togo, Ghana, Senegal (I could go on). So why then Stack did you not choose to live in one of those countries instead of the UK?

Your next selection of Communist/Totalitarian nations should be an alarm to you. Stalin is pushing the UK down the same path. So do we become the next China, Russia or North Korea or do we fight and take our country back from the swines that are seeking to destroy it?

I'll be there Saturday. I bet you won't be.

And likewise I totally support everybody having their own views. That is the problem with the UK, free speech has been and is under serious attack.

I would ask which countries run by black leaders that have more than say 50% black population would you feel you would love to be a part of? Which are doing amazingly well on the world scene? Which would you move mountains to get a VISA to live in? I don't and won't expect an answer because the lack of one just colours in the picture I painted.

As for the investment in Soglold, great to have you here and a new voice on the forum. We're all here for a payout on this one and I am sure you wouldn't have invested if you didn't see a positive case

The risk here is purely Geopolitical but that is shifting fast thanks to the Trump administration and of course a pro Business Ecuadorean leader who is not a left leaning, tree-climbing, rug-munching activist/socialist. The time to strike on Ecuador and Solgold is now.

You completely miss the point why it's pertinent. Black = corruption, it's just a trait of that race and no it's not a broad brush because many blacks who have integrated into Western cultures have done so successfully but it is a generalisation/stereotype that is easy to prove.

If you can't name a country predominantly run by or inhabited by blacks that is successful, prosperous, safe and appealing then that is because there is no such place. The reasons hark back to the problems. As a race they are lazy, aggressive, entitled and dishonest.

Mali might give with one hand and take with the other. See Burkina Faso, my original argument which I made a few days ago actually.

Politics and investments will always cross. In fact whenever you mix anything with politics you just get politics. Sport is a great example in recent years. Totally consumed by rubbish like rainbow laces, DEI and Take the knee.

Mining in Africa has always been blighted by the same problems. Corruption, theft and lazy back sods who want something for nothing and are willing to exert any amount of violence to get it.

Do we have a new Quady? Someone who refuses to answer the question asked and instead responds with something completely different?

I pointed out the government theft in Burkina Faso and then asked you to name a country run by blacks that is safe, prosperous and somewhere people want to live

Our new friend AI says "No, Mali is not considered safe for travel, with official government advisories against all but essential travel to the capital, Bamako, and against all travel to the rest of the country. Risks include terrorist attacks, widespread kidnapping for ransom by militant groups, violent crime, potential attacks by bandits. The security situation is unstable"

So a typical black country then

As a major gold producing nation, have a look at what the Burkina Faso government is doing to Western African Resources

Then when you've done that, show me a country run by blacks that is both fair and prosperous and somewhere people want to live.

I shall wait with baited breath.

Oh dear indeed, for investors and mining companies whose stocks have been suspended while the black state takes what it wants for nothing.

Is that what your oh dear meant?

HFM, yes totally aware of past expectations and I will put my hand up and admit I thought we'd be taken out not long after the BHP proposition.

The world is very different now from 2017ish, there is a very clear need to secure metals and minerals and following the Scamdemic printing press action which only further put the nail in the coffin of fiat and in particular the dollar. I think both China and Trump realise the importance of gold in some kind of reset, the latter has even craftily been praising and promising to buy Bitcoin but this is a ruse that Xi has not fallen for to his credit.

There is going to be a global battle for gold (money) and other minerals for progression and security. The risks remain as they always did, Geopolitical but America is exerting more security influence on Ecuador lately. Burkina Faso doing what blacks do. Steal, steal, steal.

Same feeling about City but think we may come up short for the same reasons as always. Plentiful attacks but no top chances and hardly any goals coupled with either a stupid goalkeeping error or a failure to defend a corner.

Acquisitions don't tend to get broadcast as "facts" and "links" before they happen

Which part of that is hard to grasp?

There isn't "a link" on the internet when a company is about to bid to acquire another one. If you knew anything about investing as you claim to, surely you'd understand that?

It's like the Star Wars bar this forum, attracts all kind of weirdos

On takeover. There is a move to hoard gold and critical minerals. Trump has cottoned on where Biden was asleep at the wheel

Things will hot up for control of Solgold. I don't believe the Chinks will take it in the end but they'll definitely make it hard for a Western suitor