time to reflect11 May 2009 20:37
I feel that the rns at the start of the year, which brought about a 400% rise, attracted people into the share that just did not have a proper grasp on how this company has been run over the last few years and the financial difficulties it was in. I personally had practically written off my investment at the backend of last year as a lesson learned. AGU always seemed to have great ideas but has struggled with reality when it comes to following things through. I am concerned with the dilution, but lets face it there was really no other option. I don't totally get my head round all the benefits of a 1 for 10 either. Without doubt though, things are now in place for angus and ross to be a major force of the future. The potential that greenland offers, and make no mistake the greenland government will be fully supportive of agu, is absolutely massive. How much we will now benefit I am not sure. So where does that all leave us? Well I for one have a sizeable holding and will certainly be holding on for at least the next couple of years. If someone can convince me that the dilution isn't insurmountable then that would be a relief. Also am I right in thinking that with 70% of shares owned by the partnering company, assuming they hold onto them, then shares may be in short supply if demand is strong? Good luck to all who stay aboard, I think i'll tuck these away and return to this board when next years icecaps have melted a little more!