Member Info for PrivateRyan

good point. let me look at that.first thought is there was a majority of shareholders in favour ?wasnt familiar with the history.
second point there was some chat on the brh board that it was actually illegal?

the rms shareholders would have to approve any sale of pharm 2
there is protection for rms shareholders if RMS was in play who would get a chance to agree to a sale- the acquirer would have to make an offer if its shareholding gets to 30%
thas why 29.9 per cent shareholdings are so common

welll i am afraid your speculation is misguided old chap . you dont get relief for reinvestment in shares as far as i recall having breen a tax professional for 30 years . Admittedly i am five years out of the game now but i am sure that would not have changed.
Also there is a tax relief for sales of substantial shareholdings.... i cant recall the precise deatails now think it was over 50 \% holding and the company had a trading activity.

just above the post message line little green button.

har de har what tax qualification do you have?

My worst fears- loads of rampers coming over here and discussing share predictions etc amonst themselves - so much for aquiet reflective board.....
wait till the derampers cotton on and then the board will descend into the hell that is the RMS board.
No class these people. But I am filtering as they arrive.....so far I am keeping up

I hope this Board doesnt turn into another RMS. Too many to filter there. The recent arrivals have all been filtered here as I do not want to read posts ****ging each other off. This was a nice quiet board ..........and very profitable if people kept their Counsel and patience. it always falls back during quiet news periods ,but never as far as it did before.

wow a sensible post! one of the 1% well done that man.

The even bigger BUFFOON is the guy who cant spell it !
what a disgrace this bulletin board is - 99% dross from bird brains. No wonder you all lose money to the professionals.

thanks for this latest update as of today! not a rehash of an old one.very professional looking .

Just a reminder Gareth let slip that enquiries were coming in for orders in excess of 2 million a day. Taken down but that is the hint at why they have changed tack fast and gone for further manufacturing capacity and licensing.
That is why I bought in and added today.

Pps I was also in tax So you need to temper that by taking c20 per cent off Ie tax on any gains on disposal. Roughly

Ps I was an accountant! High level it looks sensible

Looks very sensible to me Thanks

And what would be the maths behind that bold statement please ?

They don’t mention the other strings to rns’ bow. Very superficial I think. Normally I would have filtered the fools either ramping or deramping. I am defeated here as there are so many. I will now stop looking at this board and wait for the rns that I think is coming tomorrow and then work out for myself where this should be. An exciting morning ahead whatever happens !

I suspect that dr g ‘s tweet which gave financial info will force them to issue a proper rns tomorrow to rectify the error

I have been investing there for a year. The texrad stuff is off the boil. It is the bleepa app which could be a real flier. Newly developed and c e marked. Diagnostic quality Medical imaging is able to be shared by multi users on multi platforms If they can get another nhs trust signed up it will go places in my view.

Article in the Sunday telegraph about a test that is 99 per cent accurate and is being trialled in care homes 85 minutes. Saliva based Called the condor scheme And based on a pilot of 278 people across 4 care homes

Demand !