Member Info for prionace

Fossilfool - just read your post. Thanks. Seems a few of us were typing at the same time.

There are many saying it's cancelled and many saying it'll add £1.88 onto the SP. I've read nothing official about either so hence the confusion.

My reply was to Harry and Prox btw.

I wasn't in prior to the demerger but surely the RNS with the demerger update is just saying what it says? The demerger been suspended and not cancelled. And presumably the demerger will be resumed when/if things get back to normal.

I've not seen anything to say it has been cancelled so why would that value be added back on when the EVR shares start trading again? Have I missed something?

Get your facts right thecouchman. Big difference between 29 and 31%.

Also, what you think is neither here nor there....especially when you're trying to give misinformation. Night

Folks are getting a better idea tonight of who has shares in Evraz, and who doesn't.

Who are the ones spending all day on a bb....turning from positive to negative? And vice versa?

Shame you're all wasting these nice Spring days we've been having and will never influence Evraz's SP, especially when it's suspended :)

Lodan1 - is that what would tip you over the edge and vote for someone else these last 10 years? Wow....

Thecouchman - are you going to answer me or just give opinions what you think will happen? It isn't about what you feel in your water.

'If I'm wrong why the special treatment for the Chelsea sale...haven't heard another single instance where a sanctioned person is allowed to release an asset'

Because he's the owner and he's said that he won't profit from the sale.

Lodan - forest or Chelsea? I'm confused!

You're saying the Tories would lose every working man's vote if they Chelsea go under. Please explain why.

Lodan1 - perhaps you, your wife and your friends should broaden your horizons politically wise. Perhaps not vote for the same colour as you team? Open your minds a touch.

Never heard such nonsense in my life than that last message.

Thecouchman - Have you not read any recent RNS'

I'll give you a hint. 29%

Lodan - sorry, but that's nonsense.

Thecouchman - old news. What's that got to do with anything? Thanks

Thecouchman - the more you have, the more you want. He can prob write most of Chelsea off as any financial person could tell you.

A billionaire will never be skint no matter how hard they try :)

World Champions paid for by RA ;)

I'm a football fan. No particular English team but believe this Gov couldn't care less if any EPL team went down the drain, let alone Chelsea.

Football clubs are generally loss making for their owners.

Perhaps RA has made a lot more from Chelsea whilst being in absolute control? Selling at a loss would be inconsequential.

Great that he's giving to charity but I doubt he's losing out one way or another.

Thecouchman - Chelsea could go down the sink easily and the only folk that would care is the 70+ year old supporters and the ones who jumped on the bandwagon when Roman took over. National treasure? Do me a favour.

It's a football club. No more, no less to the Govt

Chelsea, national treasure? You have to be pulling my leg, right?

Can I pay I Dogecoin

Nathan90 - clearly Chelsea is not worth more than Evraz. But by all means, break it down for me if I'm missing something.