Member Info for Pogo001

A few questions.

Will the drop in oil prices cause a drop in costs? Yes

Will external fees paid by airline fall as a result? No

Will there be a drop in airfare prices for all carriers? Yes

Will a significant number of new aircraft delivered by carriers suddenly appear on the market by 2027? No

Is it possible to significantly increase flight occupancy by over 5% in the current situation without the airlines being charged for overbooking? No

Will the conflicts being extinguished in Europe and the Middle East have a real impact on the finances of airlines and new connections in the absence of aircraft availability? No

Are planes made of rubber and can they be filled to 130%? No.

Will the financial situation of consumers improve enough in the coming months in the face of a possible trade war and permanently growing military spending, to make them more willing to fly more often? No.

Will the entire political and economic situation on the horizon over the next 12 months allow Wizzair to significantly reduce its debt level? No

Is Wizzair a great company to speculate on its shares? Yes

We wish you a pleasant flight with Wizzair shares on board, but remember always is a landing.

Volume of turnover is not able to exceed 1.9 million. ITV share price drop by about 1% and really nothing more on about 500k volume for about 4.5 hours. So I maintain my opinion from the last post. It will hurt. For now, let the shorts count the paper profit. Of course, somewhere in the back of their accounts they should have another few hundred £k so that tomorrow thanks to them they can repeat the fun and sell another 1.5 million ITV shares on the declines using the financial leverage of 1:10 or 1:20. Hmm, so do they have this money or not? I am observing the current situation with pleasure. I will wait a while with my smile and malices.

And to be clear, what I always emphasize. I am a long term ITV investor and losses or profits on this level of the shares price do not really matter for myself and my last buy was 03.02 under 73 pence. I think that most of us know the direction of changes. Taking advantage of uncertainty on the market, although it is part of the game, is really a very risky business. Reason and calculation suggest that this game makes no sense, at least until we exceed the valuation level of ITV shares at £1.2. But everyone has their own mind and being aware that it allows for sudden breakouts up, I encourage SELL because maybe it will be cheaper..

It's Monday, 9 am. Quite a decent trading volume of 1.3 million ITV shares. Quite a lot of volatility, however, in the range of about 0.5%. The fact that it's Monday and that the ITV share price is close to recent local peaks suggest "hard work by shorts". I think when the turnover reaches +/- 2 million shares, the situation will become clear to us. Shorts will have their positions, and we will wait for the strength of the supply of shares. As for me, it will hurt.

I suggest those waiting for the RNS announcement to understand that when it appears, all the fun on "shorts" positions and also cheap purchase of ITV shares will become history. For now, the market is squeezing all possible ITV shares from undecided shareholders. The fun continues.

My (official) optimism in predicting the closing price ITV shares has prevailed again. Friday. Really big and decent day volume with the price rise and nearly at the recent peaks of ITV share price. Shorts had a lot of work to do today replenishing deposits and opening new positions. We'll see what the weekend brings us media-wise, although I think that's regardless of everything next Monday will be hot on ITV shares. For the shorts again..

77.40 or over

And one more reference to the so denied and considered irrelevant or even harmful by our trolls buyback. How is it that at the moment on the capital market the tendency to announce buyback multiplies its reach. Suffice it to mention BP, Heineken, Barrat Redrow and many other companies announce buyback (sometimes as a long ter strategy too) causing long-term increases in their shares price. And all this regardless of their financial results at the moment. I understand that it hurts some trolls because it really rewards long-term equity investors and not speculative capital looking only for opportunities, not interested in long-term increase in the value of a given company's shares. And while we are talking about ITV from my point of view, we still have not seen a solid increase in the share price due to the redemption of over 7% of the share capital. In any case, I'm waiting for reactions.

Considering the long pause in purchases from the buyback (there is about £11 million left to be used), I have a question. What about the commission charged for carrying out the whole operation? Isn't it deducted from the amount declared by ITV? If so, then perhaps it would be appropriate to announce the end of the whole process. In such a case, we should probably also expect some information on Live RNS. By the way, our main shareholder has still not sold a block of shares above the 10% limit, and this is rather a good news for the ITV share price.

According to my private thoughts before yesterday's trading session, the shorts did their job. After heavy losses on Monday (expected after Sunday's article in the FT), on Tuesday, on relatively small volumes, the shorts took advantage of their opportunity. Because after all (but or for sure?) every new player tempted by the press article bought ITV shares on Monday. Here we can partially agree, although it was probably the purely speculative capital flowing into the ITV share market, but I don't think so that we, ITV shareholders, are so happy to see this type of money invested now in the company. The one from Monday probably got burned, of course if he ran away from his investment on the first losses. In any case, Tuesday was a successful action by speculative shorts who were taking positions in the hope of a quick drop in the ITV share price to at least 73 pence or lower. We will wait and see. However, I think it will hurt again.

On the ITV share market, however, there is one positive change. Every piece of information that comes from Stock Market or newspapers in have more and more power to drive up the share price. In the background, of course, we have the upcoming financial ITV results and probably the announcement of dividend (on a market of falling interest rates). Both will probably also become fodder for the press.

At the moment we are again slow down any movement on the low volume. Bad or good and it will be a true? Low trading volume is not only a sign of weakness in the share price. It also shows its real supply and that a few percent increase in the share price practically does not generate volume.

I will leave the conclusions to the inquisitive.

Janus1

Troll and investor who is holding shorts positions is a big difference. I explained lots of time why some nicks on this forum are only fu##g trolls. Some of they said exactly that - they made it clear that - they lie on this forum because that is their nature and that is how they understand making money on stock market investments. They use this forum to manipulate people who actually invest in shares. There is also a difference between a speculator and an investor.

I have principles that I stick to in my personal and professional life. I'm talking about honesty and respect for others. I definitely have no respect for trolls. Garbage is garbage. I think that isn't only my point of view. And if you are not agree with me, it's your problem.

Hey trolls.

I hope it hurts.

Get used to it.

All the best for the real ITV shareholders.

Patience is a key of the success.

The question of a 3p increase in the value of ITV today is really a question of how much ITV is worth. So each individual should answer for themselves how much ITV shares should really be valued for them. On the other hand, I will remind you that the spin-off of assets from Vivendi caused about 40% increase in the share price after the announcement of the decision and after it itself. Today, even taking into account the fall of Canal+, the total valuation is higher by over 20%. A repeat of the scenario means a valuation of ITV shares at the level of £0.9-1. And that's all on the subject.

Revshep

The facts about ITV are well known. This company has potential and has long been underestimated by the market. Trolls treated it as an easy target for shorts positions, made a shares price up and down again and again. Now it turns out that years of speculation about selling some assets or taking over ITV may turn out to be true. The expected price, depending on the people who say it, oscillates from 80 pence (trolls) to the range of £1.2-2.5. As for myself I see a price from the top shelf here. And now individually everyone must assess the risk of entering the market, as well as the time for which they are willing to freeze their funds. We can even talk about 6 months, although if so, the icing on the cake should be the expected dividend of at least 3.3 pence per share in the meantime. But for now, all this is just the expectations of those who have been following these shares for a long time and have invested their capital in ITV.

This is your money. You have to make a choice.

77.20 That must hurt. I hope our trolls are still holding on to their short positions, believing in a miracle. And overall my 4k purchases at 70.52 on January 21 and 7k at 72.78 on February 3 isn't looking so stupid.

Looking at today's opening and the upcoming prospects, I think that most of today's posts on this forum will fortunately be filtered out. A sore butt at an opening of about 2p higher than Friday's close will mean a loss of several hundred £, which will be unpleasant news for the trolls here. The scale of the losses is still negligible, although overwhelming for our trolls. Ah.,aaa, probably not losses but gains, as usual.

In any case, the current price level allows me to wipe the tears from my mistaken forecast of Friday's settlement of ITV shares. At the same time, I think I will simply ignore this thread, as once again the level of interest in sharing knowledge and observations on the part of the trolls here is evident. I remember the times when my knowledge and opinion had a real price. So maybe this is better. Which doesn't mean I'll let trolls write nonsense and I won't expose their lies. As for their honesty, they've clearly declared that they're far from it and that only money counts.

Financial leverage allows you to earn decent money on short positions. From my own experience I remember investing with a leverage of 1:100, although on currency markets I have met dealers who played 1:1000. Different times, different rules and regulations, different risks. However, then, as today, it is either fun for big players with large capital, or on the other hand - for imbeciles who think that having nothing they will become millionaires overnight. But on this market they have a very short life, because profits grow in proportion to the risk and costs. Bragging about earnings which not enough for a dinner at McDonald's is therefore ridiculous here. Fun makes sense when we play with financial leverage of 1:100 and with a minimum deposit of £5k (not with a fu..g £100 , on 1:10 leverage). Then a 1% change is a profit or loss of the entire deposit and visible in cash specific earnings or losses. Of course, there are costs of "grounding" positions for each day, which with a larger number of open positions means that this game either forces you to day trade or generates significant costs. Often, although it depends on the options trading platform, we are forced to pay additional fees for opening or closing a position. Generally, from my point of view, but also according to market research, over 95% of small day traders on the shorts market incur statistics in the long term. This is the so-called market of suicides, unlike the stock market itself. In its case one person made money - another one will need to lost. However, many idiots still believe that by investing £100 on shorts, they will quickly become a millionaire. It will be worse if, investing a few £k on a large leverage of 1:20 or higher, he wakes up in the morning when the share price at the opening market will start with changes by 10% in the opposite direction to the one he assumed. Because then either his positions are automatically closed or he has to pay the missing collateral. The rules for this are clear. Losses must be covered by the account owner, and he is responsible for them with all his assets, not only up to the size of the deposit. Playing like an idiot on a gigantic leverage, we can wake up in the morning with tens of thousands of £ in debt, which we will have to pay for the rest of our lives. So I suggest the trolls here either stop writing nonsense with earnings in the background for a sandwich at McDonald's, or show that they have balls between their legs and play with financial leverage from 1:20 upwards and deposits above £5k. Then they will pass the test of both masculinity and holding their pee and shXXit, feeling the true power of their money, capital and the stock market.

My expected Friday closing iITV share price is 76.75

For those worried about the suspended buyback, I will remind you that the situation cyclically recurs at the turn of the month. As I said, in my opinion it is related to the transfer of funds from ITV to the Morgan Stanley. In any case, there is just over £11 million left.

My sense of humor is definitely supported by seeing 75p on the today's ITV share price and the number of filtered posts. Similarly, that I am aware that the pain in the ar...se of the trolls here is directly proportional to the money they are losing on short positions. Ups, but I need wake up. Time to prepare to real live, time to go to work. In this world there are still people who have normal occupations and jobs.

I remind those interested about the game of determining the Friday closing rate of ITV. Tomorrow from 12am to 3pm. Since I will be sleeping after another night shift, tomorrow I will limit myself to placing my type around 12. I can already see that once again it will be like playing roulette. Especially since the situation with the ITV share price is maturing for a big move up.

Solley1

And you can always add me to the FILTERS list if someone doesn't like my ratings or comments. Which solution I recommend for everyone.

Solley1

Due to my specific attitude towards ITV and my numerous comments on the forum, I assume that in order to be transparent, one should also talk about the state of one's investment portfolio and the decisions made. In addition, the size of the portfolio has its significance. Not as a suggestion of the owner's intelligent or knowledge, but as a demonstration of the limitations of short-term decision-making in the context of liquidity. As for myself a long-term investment, where the first horizon was supposed to be 2026, an important investment aspect is the dividend received or buyback. They affect both the valuation of capital and its size through reinvestment. My attitude is also a response to the attitude of accounts clearly taking short positions on ITV shares, trolling at that time and trying to force negative reactions on the market. With the ITV stock market trading at a low level volume these people are assuming a specific goal, while pretending that their assessments of the situation are impartial. To me, this is unethical. If you are commenting on something, you should clearly and continuously state your financial position related to your comments. It is a matter of principle and honesty.In general, both in financial matters and in life, I am a person who sticks to certain principles, valuing above all knowledge, experience and thinking. I destroy and expose people who take advantage of other people's naivety on principle. And I will never change that.