We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Nuff Said - Dont Be A Bell
Great advice @LoveSingh - Buy High, Sell Low - Crack on Bell
Absolutely - fell sorry for those that sold at the low at huge loss and didnt hold or take advantage of it. Bounce re-balance to come.
After all - the RNS confirms production has started and months worth or Raw materials are held in stock. Next update orders and unfortunately will screw people that sold at a low moment.
Thanks for the top up at the lovely low - nuff said - crack on with the overreactions PSML
Because its one of THE MOST HEAVILY TRADED shares on the LSE at the moment
75% of the actual votes cast
abstention does fook all - so yes you still need to vote
Pumpky - Why Vote????
Well, for an objective to be achieved it needs to have met set criteria and the completed objective literally needs to be in the past. Currently the goal is in the future and therefore not yet achieved. So to achieve the objective, individuals need to take action that is within their control to reach that future objective.
Lets face it, you dont just sit there and watch your shorts do you, no, you take action that is within your control to further your shorts. T I T
Cheers Pumpky - FFS Captain Obvious
If it helps others to more easily complete this process, I have uploaded the form I received from Nathan at Egremont to TransferWise so that others can simply download it, fill it in and send it straight to nathan.ahmad@egremont.com
1) Download Form Here
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/5110caa6f0a3c43c8d4df7e1c956540d20210108122903/cb97e7aaffb4ad246ae91da839b2d6db20210108122945/b50ec9
2) Complete it and send it back to Nathan
nathan.ahmad@egremont.com
Just emailed Nathan and received the form to complete, all done and sent back just now.
If it helps others to more easily complete this process I have uploaded the form so that others can easily download it, fill it in and send it straight to nathan.ahmad@egremont.com
1) Download Form Here
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/5110caa6f0a3c43c8d4df7e1c956540d20210108122903/cb97e7aaffb4ad246ae91da839b2d6db20210108122945/b50ec9
2) Complete it and send it back to Nathan
nathan.ahmad@egremont.com
Pumpky, Spurs, I think you'll find that in this interview your assumptions and comments are addressed by an obvious explanation of the fundamentals in this given situation https://bit.ly/2LgfXmX
8th Oct link correction
https://www.mpo-mag.com/content-microsite/mpo_covid-19/2020-08-10/avacta-announces-sars-cov-2-rapid-antigen-test-clinical-collaboration
Again, the mass testing pilots seen in public ARE the "much larger" clinical validation. Which we know has already completed, thats been clearly announced by the government.
So with avacta's/cytiva's LFT already in existence, already processed through precursive Clinical validation, and already through the "much larger" clinical validation field exercise. The next steps are fairly obvious, complete the administration processes and roll out the manufacturing. When government allows companies to update the market, they will.
If anyone watched Boris Johnson's parliamentary address to the house of commons yesterday instead of watching the public address. You will have lost count on how many times he addressed MP's questions with the mass roll of lateral flow devices. Stating that "the use of these lateral flow tests, similar to a pregnancy test, have proven to reduce transmission by two thirds in their public pilot test programs. (That is 66.66% reduction in transmissions). And that this will be the way out of restrictions in the immediate term."
https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/084b812a-4b5d-4d29-988e-c95ee3687d65
(you'll need to skip to the relevant sections)
Further to that, the UK, France, and Slovakia have all been conducting the same mass testing pilot schemes as seen in Liverpool, since September! A quick google and you will see that in the news around Europe. DYOR
ANY provider of government services and/or products can be subjected to the legislation of the national secrets act. Which would effectively silence companies providing products to the government in a state of national emergency. Which is where the UK is at.
It is absurd to think that during a state of national emergency a company providing a product or service to handle that national emergency would be allowed to publicly state their capacity for production, logistics, manufacturing updates, and monetary value. Not a chance. The legislation for this is glaringly obvious and publicly verifiable. DYOR
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/6/section/12
Quantifiable information will not be available to the market until the government allow any of the companies advising and participating in the mass testing pilot schemes to do so. So presumably sometime between the 2nd December and January because thats when the government have said that lateral flow test will be publicly available to everyone. Hence updating the market would be allowed to follow.
It's not a co-incidence that ALL of the companies participating in the mass testing pilot schemes. When producing any RNS since 30th September have just been re-iterating things that are already known in the public domain. It's highly likely that all of the obvious companies will be involved not just avacta.
People saying that avacta doesn't have a LFT, is simply false. 8th October:
"LSTM (Liverpool School Of Tropical Medicine) is currently evaluating the performance of prototype lateral flow tests provided by Cytiva alongside Avacta’s ELISA laboratory test using SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus samples, as a precursor to full clinical validation studies"
Clinical Validation - Avacta's/Cytiva's lateral flow tests was already in the process of being validated by the Liverpool School Of Tropical Medicine alongside the ELISA test back in October and precursor to full validation. As stated here on the 8th October.
https://www.mpo-mag.com/content-microsite/mpo_covid-19/2020-08-10/avacta-announces-sars-cov-2-rapid-antigen-test-clinical-c
mortgagefreeman - I’ve not sold any of my AVCT holding. Sod selling while that mess occurred today.
The post was just trying to get some thoughts on how the mess of erroneous trades (sells) produced by H&L today will get sorted out (on all shares not just here).
So mortgagefreeman are you saying that it will be left to the individuals to buy back shares that they’re in deficit of?
Some folks just posted that H&L had corrected the errors of over sells this evening on their accounts? (Anyone confirm?)
If so, then surely H&L will have to buy that lot back?
gkb - I guess like doorstop said it depends which whether there were more multiple buys/sells. Either way, I guess the buys would be in theory able to be legitimately purchased from the free float available.
Whereas the erroneous sells ended up selling shares that people didn’t actually hold (which obviously shouldn’t happen, but did, a hell of a lot today in these errors).
So yeah, I guess you’re right, another day of chaos awaits. While calmly awaiting things being corrected