Member Info for PL75

Happy as Larry with the data (Larry is the 60 yr old btw)

‘Hiccups’.

Nice to see the 59 year old is now 60. A very brave soul, thankfully rewarded by an extension to his life. Here’s to you sir!

Data looks good and well presented by Chris. Shame misery guts Alan will psss all over the bonfire tomorrow.

Good stuff, I'd have added 'and pre|CISIONTM' to this... "The dataset that we will publish at AACR demonstrates a proof of concept for AVA6000"

Reads very well, where are they publishing it other than their own website though??

He's resorted to literally batting them away with a sh.tty stick gmcc. Security struggled to hold back the first wave of execs, who resorted to using their chequebooks to dish out some nasty paper cuts to make their way to beg Simon to adorn them with a contract signature from the holy grail shaped ink well

Gje, you're quick to cotton on.

Oooof, twatterati bubble burst right there. You're absolutely right, that kind of level headed posting spoils all the fun of suggested deals are due within 3 weeks.

A professional version for the website and a bumbling mess for the retail rabble that you despise.

Absolutely CTSFO. The disease control rate being at 50% when they won't have been as selective for phase 1a. The data looks really good and it seems to be ticking all the boxes. It's proven safe, it's releasing Dox where it needs to be in higher concentrations, can't hope for more.

Haha, true Bein, but he'll occasionally drop Nasdaq in the odd presentation or RNS if he thinks that's what people want to hear.

Bella, pretty simple - it's happened just before the AACR poster, they want to look like a Tx company not a Dx company with a M&A strategy that bankrupt the business and lasted 5 minutes. So when Simon hands out his business cards promising a PDC business, that's what they'll see. NO NEED TO SHOUT, IT'S NOT THAT EXCITING. Yet.

Yet the presentation will contain additional data. It’s almost like you can’t rely on a single word Alan says. Best let the data do the talking.

I’ve seen the video with Chris. She’s conducting a choir of 40 cancer survivors singing I’m Still Standing. They’ll be on this years BGT.

Someone in the thread said it wasn't there.

They've changed the website to highlight Tx just before AACR. Not a coincidence. I'd be surprised to see Dx given any limelight ever again.

Dx is listed on the footer. It’s not an error to fling that to the bottom and bring partnerships to the top.

I offered the kite flying advice, sadly it wasn’t taken up. Report, ignore, bin. Or sit in a stinking basement arguing with yourself for 20p a pop, your choice. Bunch of weirdos.

Agreed. Everyone should have the weekend off. Top tip for the twats, it's a great day for heading out with your favourite sizeable kite near your local picturesque cliff edge. Enjoy!

Yeah, exactly that, I used to do it purely for sport, but after a while the same old pointless arguments get stale. I've green boxed the lot of them for a while now, but it's reasonably futile when you see others engaging with them and filling the board anyway.

Reporting doesn't seem to result in permanently stopping disruptive accounts, so that leaves ignoring or binning. If people haven't the discipline not to take the bait, then bin them. If everyone did it, it would actually work as the idiots would just be screaming at themselves in to the abyss.

Always happy to share my starter pack:

LivedataaccountsheppyGeneralOzIcecoolJWBellamyWatching2ToukankahmoonViking.RaiderSlacker246TheValueCurvewyndrumThornogsonD-GeemanTrendz

and Timster, of course.

Hi DTW, posts crossed. All makes sense, no worries.

That's all fine. There's nothing wrong with coming up with a shortlist of better Qs, I agree, in the past the Investormeet host has picked out poor Qs. It's not an issue if they follow up with the remainder on the platform of course.

The opposite can be argued. Rather than hoping they're duplicated, sharing them gives others the chance to submit the same and add weight to them if they want to see them answered. I've shared mine and I'd be delighted if everyone else asked the same...

We'll find out soon enough, I'm sure they're good valuable Qs. Shame the evil telegram gatekeepers don't want to discuss them on here and see if they can be improved. With filters in place, it's still possible to have a sensible conversation on here.

It's a bit odd not to want to share the Qs on here 13th. It doesn't make any difference as they're being submitted anyway. It'll be Alan's prerogative to decide what he wants to answer as it has always been. They did a much better job last time via Investormeet of answering more questions than usual. The problem is that the answers had a shelf life of 5 minutes. If Alan remains clueless on strategy then the Q&A is a waste of time for everyone.

Main focus for me for the session is the science and seeing more of the data, I'll be shoveling down more than a pinch of salt for everything else he says as he's proven time and time again to be full of it. As long as the science proves itself then the potential remains.

Posted again for reference, I'm assuming these are Qs 1-4:

Why was the retail appetite for supporting the business (as demonstrated by the oversubscription at 95p) not used for the raise rather than the HUGE discount given to scumbags that openly admit on podcasts hosted by clout chasing morons like Paul Hill that they're only investing for a fast buck?

What changed from the arrogance of 'don't worry about that - chuckle' to shafting all existing shareholders?

Why has the ava6k strategy changed over the course of a few weeks between the December presentation and the Turner Pope note shown to the 'investors'? Why has phase 1b re-emerged under a different name?

When will the CEO step aside so that someone with some commercial and strategic ability can ensure the future success of this business rather than the lifestyle CEO who's only talent seems to be kicking the can down the road whilst making calamitous naive embarrassing harmful decisions?