Member Info for pijoe1212

please post as you wish ..i am a great believer in free speech.

tpt look lloyds insurance stds are the marker throughout the world and accept it or not API standards rule ..end of. p.s. san fran time zone means i am still working (after hrs) on a west African scheme...last con call in 13 mins...sometimes i fill my time between con calls posting meanwhile, i sugest i will not post here again..at least for a while ...bye

you are clearly not able to use google? really - but of course i know where to look for stds i have contributed to.... https://www.amerpipe.com/steel-pipe-products/api-5l-pipe-specifications/ note annex H for sour .. https://global.ihs.com/doc_detail.cfm?document_name=API%20STD%20521&item_s_key=00489555&item_key_date=851131 there of course a few more relevant stds to lloyds certification of pipelines..i am sure you have the engineering knowledge to find this info..

safety factors are as per insurance co (lloyds ) requirements. these are based on API standards..what do you need to know? all such systems (like pipelines) are subject to 3rd party inspection for insurance purposes (as AST was required to undertake some 18 -24 months ago). i will leave and others to look up API 5L and is assocaited sub ref standards (like 521..which i know very well) and lloyds insurance standards - its all on google.. anyway - i started these posts noting how uber-rampers bullied me off the AST BB.. so its bye for not from me.. TPT - bet a few dont like you now!

so what is your question? sorry but i am not scaremongering .. there was no cathodic protection on the pipeline (public domain fact) my question is what is the remaining corrosion allowance and what does the API code with CO wet gas allow prior to next insurance certification inspection allow? now what is your question? perhaps you should directly ask CH my question? i will not as not invested!

tpt what question do want an answer to? i can not see any question outstanding

i noted that promotion also. can not be bad !

sometimes i may have a glass or two..but only sometimes! read my posts on rkh- i do not post on ii.. i can, and do chat to some interesting folks ...not least of which is CH at AST! being an ex - main stream oiler and now a gray beard helps...

EC asked if i do my homework or was here to wind up peeps. i responded i do my homework. Ec posted about API USA figures released this evening - i responded.no code involved!

gaso draw of 1.68 but dist build of 1.47...refinery change over impact?

sorry but mr parsnips is the new big dave - not for me.. but big dave has made lots of peeps big cash as has parsnips...but i invest in cos i believe in not momentum plays (i think i am the looser and clearly the comments on this BB help me understand that!)

EC i read with much amusement your posts on the II rkh bb... look the gas is wet and co'ed - this is fact in documentary evidence by 3rd party. fact. end of. the water is only removed to a % at point of production and is then shipped across the boarder. INA then strip the gas (aminie i am told by CH.. which by the way is what the IPPC app is for - an ammine plant which is subject to EC regs - same as UK) . simple gas processing but needs a bit of paper. i do my homework EC! looking forward to your ii rkh updates tomorrow

could you get your snout even more in the bottom mud!! adr- u mean adl(shitebag)? coro (parsnip ramperonny?). i hold lek and as you know trade amer..logp could be good into Q3/Q4

could i suggest you do your homework (research)? NM

once again pointing out a few facts on the bb.. and some more detailed feedback on my chat with ch

which oilys you in now?

is that not unfair? send rachel while hes at home and Mrs wass out at the shops?

oh dear..the documentary evidence is (or is that was?) on the ast website. it is co sour. now lets not start that discussion again! i know a fact from an opinion! colin did tell me the gas it is mixed with over the border is more sour - which explains the reason they will take it. but dont forget with inperfect dryers (as colin stated to me) acid will be dropping out in a carbon steel steel pipeline..corrosion allowance remaining (and predicted rate) in the line anyone as material investment information? oh and dont foregt the public domain info also tells you the external corrosion has not been protected by cathodic protection...so pipe is being "eaten" from inside and outside

i can believe date or time would be a challenge for him! - it was both his look and the lady's face (colleague on the stand) with him when i mentioned i highlighted the sour gas and it seamed to need a few e-mails from posters to get facts out (which were in the public domain to start with). what also got me was the look when i asked about the strategic review - what was the option...little smirk..i took it to mean who knows and have plan B (which i would not chose to be part of)

you think stating "don�t be a lazy little prick" will get a response - other than asking you to be polite?