RE: ยฃ1+11 Jul 2020 11:53
My two pennโorth on the RNSโฆ.
Of course, Trak and the customer have some sort of handle on the numbers, but Trak is constrained in what it could, and what it would be wise to, announce to the world.
Itโs walking a tightrope. It needs to balance the desire/imperative:
- to keep the market informed
- not to divulge too much market sensitive information to the competition
- not to upset the customer (it doesnโt even mention its name)
- to comply with any wording of the contract that may place limits on disclosure by the parties (for Trakโs protection as much as much as that of the customer).
So even if Trak knows enough to make a meaningful statement of likely revenues and profits, it must despite its excitement at landing the contract, not get carried away, and on balance, I think the wording of the RNS was well-judged.
To partner with a major food company is a feather in its cap, and the RNS is telling the world โweโve arrived, weโre being taken seriously as a major player in the large fleet marketโ. For me, thatโs the main message from the RNS.
So I think the RNS went far enough to inform and reassure the market, without going too far.
Personally, I would not want to be tempting fate either, and come out with some amazing numbers for revenues/profits. Numbers will be forthcoming soon enough in the form of - with Covid-19 behind us hopefully - a forecast for the year, when the half year accounts are presented.