Member Info for Phimx

Steve888: You post

" This might have something to do with ot"

Alternatively, nothing whatsoever to do with QBT. Simply more fantasy by desperate investors trying to escape before the end game plays out.

WillIwontI:

You could learn a lot from Micky's AI searches and posts

Buildanestegg:

To make money.

Was that a trick question

Mrhanji: You post

" They are ongoing - focus is on method c not method a and b which are ticking away in the background update was very clear on this"

On 19 June 25 Gardin's focus was

"After careful review of the market's needs, QBT is focused on working with companies who deploy aftermarket control boards on their Bitcoin miners"

And you think, after 8 months, the discussions are ongoing with the aftermarket boards ? Hahahaha little Smash Martian rolls on floor clutching belly haha haha

RNS 24 September 2025: Gardin stated:

" In June 2025, QBT announced ongoing discussions with aftermarket control board providers to integrate these methods (A+B), which the board believes could allow rapid market penetration through existing miners worldwide."

From June 25 the talks/discussion are ongoing ??????

It is now almost 8 months later and no results from these discussions. Nothing in the last update. Deadly silence from the chief mumbler.

Draw your own conclusions ?

Mrhanji: You post

" If you believe the rns ..."

Yes I believe the 265 Foundation is doing well !

Mrhanji: You post

"2 sides it's seems.. one side saying nothing in the rns is true at best fabricated"

A slight correction to what you've posted:

Truly there's nothing in the RNS!

Anxiety:

With a 22% spread !!!

Mickdj: You post

" Calling the company a “skeleton non commercial project” is not fact — it is opinion ..."

Correct Micky, it is not a fact. Perhaps that's why my exact words were:

" I think QBT is a skeleton non commercial project..."

So as everyone can see I didn't claim it was a fact, you did!!!

Mickydj: You post

" The point is tactical posting, not your interpretation"

The very word 'tactical' implies pre-planning by the participants. You've already acknowledged that we are all different posters, which is a sensible conclusion based upon writing styles and phrases used. Of course if you go to most other boards you will see the same words and phrases used. Not surprising really is it, everyone is using the same language about the same subjects. The same characters exist and post with the same rang of skills and experience. There's the moronic one-liners " this is going to explode on news" etc. The poster that can't help but post disguised swear words, the insulted. Absolute fanatical believers and disbelievers. The 'expert' on the company and the opposite poster that knows nothing. So it goes on, pick a board and read it!

Me, I'm not much for great conspiracies but AIM has been shown to be very misleading and created huge losses for private investors. Therefore, I suspect there are people paid to push agendas here maybe and elsewhere but why pay when the British public do it for you and for free?

Personally I post here without help or hindrance from anyone else. What I write are my own words using my own ideas. Very occasionally I cite AI text but like others, at least honest posters, I note the use of AI assisted posts.

I think QBT is a skeleton non commercial project, fleshed out by vague and ambiguous RNS and open to huge interpretation of their meaning and importance.

So ends my sermon!

Mickydj:

Everyone here is a trader. Everyone here has an agenda, mostly to make money. You appear surprised, why do you bring this very obvious fact to everyone's attention.

Given a reasonable ramp I'm sure you'll sell this like a shot.

Mickydj: You post

"This observation is behavioural only and does not claim shared identity between users."

𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁

Mickdj: You post

" These sequences frequently occur immediately following RNS announcements or company updates and may create the appearance of coordinated sentiment escalation.

What a shocker, following an update which essentially said "we talked with lots of people" don't be surprised if many investors are losing faith and are unhappy. I think you'll find there is huge correlation between failure to deliver and negative shareholder sentiment. Well done for spotting the pattern !

Mickydj: You post and regarding Phimx

" Repeated credibility attacks toward company leadership"

I guess that's because of repeated failures of Gardin to meet the expectations of the claims he makes. Credibility is only possible if he delivers on his ambiguous, vague and totally unverified statements he makes.

MrHanji:

I'm glad you are pleased with progress but a minor point, did you notice, in the latest update, that Gardin did not say. " we are busy installing Method C software on our 3 NDAs miners and this will be completed shortly"

Instead Gardin treated investors to an update on the 265 Foundation ??

The last RNS relating to Method C and the NDA companies stated

" The process has reached the stage where these three companies will now be needing to make their mining rigs available to QBT's testing team at its laboratory in Milan, with access to their relevant source code. This will allow QBT to install the software version of Method C AI Oracle, the launch of which was announced on 12 November 2025,"

As we know from Mickdj, you cannot rely on what Gardin says cos it's not RNS

Mickydj: You post

" Frequently then builds longer posts quoting RNS history, highlighting contradictions or delays, and directly challenges bullish posters. This often provides technical justification to earlier sentiment posts."

It's good you can now acknowledge contradictions and delays in Gardins story. It's also good you have

changed your tune of several posters being the same person. There's more than one person in this world thinks this company is destined for failure.

Mickydj: You post

" This is not about whether posters are right or wrong. Healthy debate is important. This is simply an observation of how certain discussions repeatedly develop on this board, particularly after RNS or interview releases"

If you care to investigate thers boards I think you'll find the same patterns of postings, the rampers and derampers defending their viewpoints with the same well trodden verses.

If it's conspiracy theories you are looking for you'll find them in abundance.

Get real sonny, you should never have invested in AIM if you were expecting to make your fortune. You are gambling, nothing more or less. You'll think your smarter than the average punter but without the real non public story behind the scenes you are guessing like everyone else. This board and virtually all the others are entertainment, and means very little.

Mickydj: You post

" This is not about whether posters are right or wrong. Healthy debate is important. This is simply an observation of how certain discussions repeatedly develop on this board, particularly after RNS or interview releases"

If you care to investigate thers boards I think you'll find the same patterns of postings, the rampers and derampers defending their viewpoints with the same well trodden verses.

If it's conspiracy theories you are looking for you'll find them in abundance.

Get real sonny, you should never have invested in AIM if you were expecting to make your fortune. You are gambling, nothing more or less. You'll think your smarter than the average punter but without the real non public story behind the scenes you are guessing like everyone else. This board and virtually all the others are entertainment, and means very little.

Mrhanji: You post

" What we should be focused on is the rns and the developments over the past couple of years.."

The RNS was great PR for the 265 Foundation, but itself seems to be just another hobbyist home hashing system. The developments over the last 2 years would seem to be a bit ephemeral and the focus has shifted several times. Is the 265 another focus shift in the making?

Riceyboy84:

Don't speak too soon! Many companies on AIM have gone for years and yearswithout producing anything for shareholders. UKOG is a good example. The companies become simply pump and dumps. Gamblers trying to make a quick fast buck. Long term holders diluted then consolidated until their holding is worthless and not worth selling.

This looks like a great target for the P&D now. I think most genuine investors now realise thoughts of great wealth are not realistic.