RE: Translation #43, 3m TV piece on ZM court case28 Feb 2021 15:35
I don't know Dulwichman, I'm starting to doubt though whether we can trust either SN or ZM. SN founded the company and probably sees it as his own. I'm starting to think that SN might have went to setup a situation to get rid of ZM once the Arbitration was over. I don't see ZM as necessarily a dishonest guy but he may see it that he was owed money from other sources in the company as the company was not in a good enough shape to pay them, all money had to go into developing the field including not paying others. Now that's never a good way to do it as it looks dodgy and presumably no agreement was ever made to that effect.
My main concern at this point is that ZM is apparently now the biggest creditor, by how much we don't know and also we don't know what SN has been doing. We should be wary I think of who is loaning the company money and on what terms and anything else that may effect debt and hence equity. Are SN and/or ZM out after a bigger Equity stake in the company themselves somehow? Thereby watering down existing shareholders percentage share of the company in comparison? I personally think as Frontera is now apparently US parent owned company (now that the Cayman companies have been liquidated) that we should look to see if there is any internal action we can take as part of US Federal or State law so we can find out what is going on, can we hold an EGM regardless of company terms under US law for example? I don't see Hope as a reason for radio silence now post ARB, but I think that can be used as a reason to keep shareholders in the dark while either SN or ZM, or both suit themselves with what they can get out of Frontera potentially at the expense of all us other shareholders.