Member Info for Phantom25

Don't forget a lot of people have to find money for their tax bill before end of January

Same here I have zero income so have to choose which stock to sacrifice every month they're all waiting on news

To be fair Chunky if there was never any sellers, there would be no shares available to buy.

So show me an RNS or an article on the Avacta website that supercedes that presentation suggesting that they are now using antibodies. Not just a link to your Twitter account

https://avacta.com/how-a-lateral-flow-rapid-test-works/
Care of PJ...
Where's the antibody?

Well I stupidly trusted the animated presentation with AS cometary that said it was carried along by an Affimer. Give it a rest idiot

And you've missed my point, the test has been suspended, for whatever reason. You are like the guy behind the counter in the 'parrot' sketch. Google it if you are too wet behind the ears

Marik
I couldn't give a **** how the antibody is used. Fact is, it is a component of the test and is being blamed as the cause of the suspension of the device. Get real

Considering AS was not shy when coming forward to **** off antibodies, does that presentation put him in a 'sticky' position legally

Ask yourself this.
Why has it taken until this point to announce that Affidx needs an antibody component?
All the BS about how the LFT uses suppior Affimers and the advantages over antibodies
Remember the slides of how the LFT works, no mention of antibodies there.
He can never be trusted again on any project dialogue

IMO it's the end of the road for the LFT. No mention in the RNS 'working hard to resolve the issue, or similar' . Look at the other failed covid projects, BAMS and saliva test. Never officially cancelled just quietly put to one side. Just like the Cytiva partnership, Officially it's still going. But it's not

I haven't trusted Smith for the last 12 months. I have thought he is a deceitful 'POS' who shows nothing but contempt for shareholders.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1GO28I?espv=1

You may be correct about the last half hour, but how else can you define a closing price if you can't trust the auction.

Actually Mr R you have demonstrated it's a waste of time, you have noticed several fake closing auction trades in succession, but have chosen to ignore them. My impression is those trades are set by delusional smart arses who think they are being clever. Probably boasting down the pub how they work the market, when the real effect is Jack

So it spooks a few 'lockdown investers' but the other 99.9% ignore it. I never use a closing auction price to judge the trend, I will look at the last half hour of trading.

Sorry Impossible = not impossible

Mr R. No it's impossible that a MM could get someone to do it by proxy. But why would they? If caught they'd be in serious chit, probably loose the banks MM membership. But also they wouldn't do it because they know investors who are savvy totally ignore silly little auction trades

Wong. Read what I posted dumbass. MMs do not play a part in auctions. In an auction a PI/investor trades directly with another, no MM/broker involved.

IT = UT