RE: Global Markets Up Today9 Feb 2022 17:40
From FT:-
Tim Spector, professor of genetic epidemiology at King’s College London, said the planned rule change in England was “pragmatic” as self-isolation rules were “essentially self-policed”.
“No longer mandating isolation periods isn’t going to make a big difference,” said Spector. “The people who are currently respecting the rules will probably carry on respecting those rules even if they’re not legally enforced.”
But he stressed the need to continue with “strong public health messaging”, adding that the government “must not pretend it’s over”.
However, Professor Christina Pagel, a member of the Independent Sage group of science advisers, called the move “depressing”, adding that it would make going to work or going out in public “riskier” and would adversely affect people in jobs “where it’s not easy to work from home and there is pressure to go in”.
“The implication is that [the government] expects everyone to get infected, more than once, for a disease considerably more infectious than flu and considerably more dangerous than a cold,” she added.