RE: londontown30 Jun 2020 18:59
I don't agree with that Ian. Yes we can blame the social media tweet. Was pure stupidity, I dunno what that guy was thinking. However if EUA had been able to clarify the involvement of citic, we would be out of suspension. What the tweet did is highlight an issue. EUA themselves told people they were working with citic before. It is now their problem which they have failed to resolve for 5 months.
As I said I do not think the company is malicious. I'm not trying to accuse them of wrongdoings. But I am disappointed that it is taking so long, little to no updates.
Delays are a negative. Coming so close to delisting is a negative. Originally quite a few people thought it was the no nomad reason to we continued to be suspended but it turns out that's not the case as we are still suspended after a month. It is natural that people should vent or complain after bad things. We can not pretend they are not bad things. As I've said in terms of official things, stated in the RNS since the suspension there is very little to be positive. People are listing things which are not fact/guarantee, there's no fact a deal is about to happen, "talks and negotiations" is not the same. The stuff I believe Alex posted is encouraging, but it's not official per RNS.
Any other aim company were suspended for 5 months, people would be complaining. EUA is no different, it's a share. Which is why I find it extremely strange people go and attack those who find this disappointing, they are well within their rights. EUA has potential for sure, but that doesn't make it so that anything negative that comes along can be flat out ignored or brushed to the side. It is extremely worrying the length of suspension and the constant delays, as was the trouble of finding a new nomad.