Member Info for Pecten11

https://twitter.com/JAHC1/status/1331569905200664578/photo/1

B3NTL3Y - do you really feel the need to sink to the level of the school playground by changing my user ID when replying?
It just marks out your posts as puerile - like a baby stamping its feet to get attention

Do these figures apply to every tonne mined ?

Don’t ya just love CtrlC, CtrlV.......

Glasir 'My point is that you can use the space as a force for good.'

Personally, I think it's better if it it's a space for truth and facts - less subjective

Eastside - the vote will get passed - with a vast majority retail share holding base, theirs nothing to stop it - cos most wont actually vote, so their shares will be used by the chairman's proxy.
nobody seemed to want to debate whether it was a fair deal anyway

MRK - the letter to shareholders stated 'drilling programme and assaying has been completed which has delivered sufficient information to support an Inferred JORC Mineral Resource for gold and other polymetallic minerals in one or more of several distinct breccia pipes.'
So as we have in house, suitably qualified expertise (Craig) then why hasn't this inferred JORC already been compiled and published - after all, we as shareholders have paid for the drilling?
You never know, it could have supported an increased valuation for VAST - but then APMG might not have 'qualified' for as many shares in the pending transaction

Secondly re the website, couldn't agree more - the Manaila operations page still states 'Currently producing a copper concentrate, zinc concentrate and pyrite concentrate with gold and silver credits'
Really, thought it had been on care and maintenance for over a year

Thirdly re the website, didn't AP say in the Crux interview that the indicated and inferred JORC for Baita ( not just the summary) was going to be uploaded to the website?

I don't want to be, but its things like this which make me negative - couldn't organise a **** up in a brewery springs to mind

B3NTL3Y - first of all, if you have a 3-5 year investment horizon and VAST succeed in their production/revenue forecasts you should do ok from the current SP position
Secondly - 'Think you may find my name may suggest in some way what I'm in involved with, aswell as interests in certain sectors' --- second hand cars or psychiatry........

Thanks for bringing humour to the board
Lol

B3NTLEY 'I know what Vast is worth with its resources, reserves, assets, revenue and an operational mine '

If you're so well researched and knowledgeable about mine infrastructure and operations as your statement above implies, would you care to explain why in your post of 02.51 today you stated 'FORECASTED REVENUE FOR Q4 ($5.37m)' which is roughly a factor of 3 higher than VASTs own guidance issued on 7th September ??

Or are you just another chancer, trying to create your own figures to justify a ramp and help get last weeks admitted placing shares a new home??
I'm sure readers can decide......

B3ENTL3Y 'if you want to be smart' - why don't you prove how smart you are and tell us all what %Cu (or Zn) the concentrate product is?
While you're at it, enlighten us all with the $ or % discount that Mercuria buy product from us?

Btw Piker, we aren't making/selling a separate gold or silver product (maybe some time in the future) - they will be present in the concentrate. Normally impurities incur a penalty to the price (likely in the short term to apply to the lead and molybdenum, as the smelter will need to remove them from the final product) but due to the value the Au and Ag will probably have a positive effect) . Hopefully they will at least balance out the TCs and RCs cost (Tolling and Refining)

Bezzy, I didn't accuse you of anything - just stated a fact that that information hadn't been officially released

And I queried it due to exactly the point you made that it may be another's assertions - rather than fact

Piker/Bezzy, if you have seen that then its inside information as no details have been publicly released

FordLane , have you ever heard 'the market is irrational', so nobody knows what WILL happen.
All you can do, is try and have as good a grip on the facts and information available to make your own guess

So if my maths are correct, Mike Kellow would need to issue a TR1, as he be over 3% but as the sons would be under the threshold, we would never know if they held or sold

So that around 1,200,000,000 not locked in
Plus 900,000,000 odd shares were only admitted on the 9th November and volume hasn't been particularly high since then

Eastside - nope just Prelea and Tucker Senior - Mike Kellow and the sons havent agreed a lock in

Gbjoe, as the delivery and thus payment has been so widely trailed, an argument could be made that it is 'priced in'
If the SP does go up, it would in effect be an expression of how much doubt there is in AP actually doing what he says, when he says it
It really shouldn't be news - it's just the company doing what they've already told the market

Chris, is it worth going back though your posts to see how many times you've posted the same or similar things??
Lots of things could happen - APs job is to make them happen, not deal in the speculative

Personally I'm surprised there is so little discussion over whether the value ascribed to APMG is correct?

The 'independent'directors have implied that most of VASTs other assets have no attributable value - Blueberry (though they have the info for an inferred JORC - but that would then imply a value), Magura Neagra, Piciorul Zimbrului, or the Remin'backdoor' and negligible value to Manaila or Zimbabwe with the paragraph 'In conducting negotiations to determine a purchase price that could be agreed between all the Parties, it was recognised by the Independent Directors that the existing 80% holding in BPPM represented in their opinion the substantial majority of the value of the Company as recognised by investors as a whole.'
This is used to justify the value and thus the numbers of shares that will be issued to the APMG directors.
Does everyone agree with this?

The ratification of APMGs holding needs to take place, but is this fair value for VASTs shareholders?

Does that increasing trade set a new record for the smallest £ to cause a theoretical SP drop?